Jump to content

Church Of England Debate Gender Of God


Tiberius

Recommended Posts

What next? Jesus  won't be lily-white?  

 

For decades, the gender of God has prompted debate within the Church, with many calling for male pronouns He and Him, as well as reference to Our Father, to be scrapped in favour of either gender neutral or female alternatives.

 

Now, in what would mark a departure from centuries of tradition, bishops are to launch a project “on gendered language” referencing God in church services later this year.

The move has been criticised by conservatives, who have warned that “male and female imagery is not interchangeable”. However, liberal Christians have  welcomed it, claiming that “a theological misreading of God as exclusively male is a driver of much continuing discrimination and sexism against women”.

Details of the plans emerged in a written question to the Liturgical Commission, which prepares and promotes forms of service and religious worship in the Church, at General Synod, the Church’s lawmaking body, which is sitting this week.

Any permanent changes or rewriting of scriptures with gendered language would have to be agreed by a future meeting of Synod.

 

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/uknews/gender-neutral-god-considered-by-church-of-england/ar-AA17cFTD

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

God is a being

No need for human gender.

 

By the way, no knowledgeable human thinks that Jesus was "lily white."

That is nonsense.

 

He was the same as others of his locale/era.

It is mentioned that his appearance never stood out.

Edited by sherpa
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, sherpa said:

God is a being

No need for human gender.

 

By the way, no knowledgeable human thinks that Jesus was "lily white."

That is nonsense.

 

He was the same as others of his locale/era.

It is mentioned that his appearance never stood out.

image.png.b91dab084c35de9bb56c6797bc13ef10.png

 

This looks Lily-white. Is this wrong? 

  • Eyeroll 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

image.png.b91dab084c35de9bb56c6797bc13ef10.png

 

This looks Lily-white. Is this wrong? 

 

Are you serious?

I am aware of no art work that has ever been produced that claims to be a likeness of the appearance of Jesus. 

 

He was simply an unremarkable looking male of his time, and went to lengths to not disclose his divinity on a large scale.

A few miracles here and there, with often admonitions to not mention stuff.

Anything of an unusual appearance would certainly have been mentioned.

 

Just dumb.

 

Either way, God does not have human gender.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, sherpa said:

 

Are you serious?

I am aware of no art work that has ever been produced that claims to be a likeness of the appearance of Jesus. 

 

So all the Christian art work depicting Jesus are what? The many Churches that have him in stained glass 

 

image.png.5fcd5b643b07c7dfe45194365eea4a01.png

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Tiberius said:

So all the Christian art work depicting Jesus are what? The many Churches that have him in stained glass 

 

image.png.5fcd5b643b07c7dfe45194365eea4a01.png

 

Are you attempting to say that depictions of deities that reflect one's culture are efforts to "white"wash said divine being?

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

someone could read about Correlation does not imply causation.

 

 

Or does the fact the Douglas Zion church in Elmira NY has a huge Black Jesus painted as a mural on the front of the building, discredit your statement?

 

 

Edited by Chris farley
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LeviF said:

 

Are you attempting to say that depictions of deities that reflect one's culture are efforts to "white"wash said divine being?

I am sure his point is that through history people have all tried to be as Christlike as possible and when explaining to children it is easiest for them to see themselves in an entity that is physically similar and familiar. To make a different argument would require a level of stupidity that only Billsy has around here, not Tibs. Also God does not have a gender he is above all that and  our tiny human minds can't properly understand.

 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Tiberius said:

Just seems inaccurate, not a big deal, but kind of funny. Others do it too

 

My favorite is probably Chinese Jesus complete with fu manchu. 

1 minute ago, Orlando Tim said:

I am sure his point is that through history people have all tried to be as Christlike as possible and when explaining to children it is easiest for them to see themselves in an entity that is physically similar and familiar. To make a different argument would require a level of stupidity that only Billsy has around here, not Tibs. Also God does not have a gender he is above all that and  our tiny human minds can't properly understand.

 

 

The RC and EO churches both allow for icons to be constructed with similar ethnic markers as the local populations. 

 

Anyway I guess all this is what happens when a king decides to start a schism because he doesn't like his wife.

  • Agree 1
  • Haha (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

All Mighty God, if you're monitoring this message board please hit the "reset" button on the human race because your experiment has failed as some sort of social madness and insanity has overcome the world you have created which leaves the human race capable of only focusing on things of a trivial nature while things of importance are left to die and whither.  or if this is some "Matrix" type existence simulation, please, erase the program and start over.  Thank you. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

All Mighty God, if you're monitoring this message board please hit the "reset" button on the human race because your experiment has failed as some sort of social madness and insanity has overcome the world you have created which leaves the human race capable of only focusing on things of a trivial nature while things of importance are left to die and whither.  or if this is some "Matrix" type existence simulation, please, erase the program and start over.  Thank you. 

this sounds blasphemous in some way or something 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

So all the Christian art work depicting Jesus are what? The many Churches that have him in stained glass 

 

image.png.5fcd5b643b07c7dfe45194365eea4a01.png

 

New level of ignorance regarding religion.

 

What madness is next?

You mean Jesus wasn't really born on Dec 25th?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

No, that's just because it's the Winter Solstice we celebrate Christ-mass then 

 

Ya.

Because of his "lily white skin," he needed to be born on the day of least daylight.

everybody knows that.

 

Not sure what "Christ-mass" means, and not interested in finding out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, ALF said:

Jesus

Lord's Prayer, also called Our Father, Latin Oratio Dominica or Pater Noster, Christian prayer that, according to tradition, was taught by Jesus to his disciples.

 

Aside from the fact that God almost exclusively self-refers in the masculine throughout the Bible, the particularly odd bit about this whole thing is that the (little "O") orthodox Christian tradition believes that Jesus of Nazareth is himself God, which you would think would put an end to the "debate" entirely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jesus gender has nothing to do with his divinity.

Jesus was on earth as a human.

His divinity is completely separate.

 

The Bible, whether in Hebrew, Greek, Latin or English uses the language of the time.

It has noting to do with God's relating any gender.

 

  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

representation matters and can and has been used for nefarious purposes.

https://www.britannica.com/story/the-long-history-of-how-jesus-came-to-resemble-a-whiteeuropean

 

Scholar Edward J. Blum and Paul Harvey argue that in the centuries after European colonization of the Americas, the image of a white Christ associated him with the logic of empire and could be used to justify the oppression of Native and African Americans.

In a multiracial but unequal America, there was a disproportionate representation of a white Jesus in the media. It wasn’t only Warner Sallman’s Head of Christ that was depicted widely; a large proportion of actors who have played Jesus on television and film have been white with blue eyes.

Pictures of Jesus historically have served many purposes, from symbolically presenting his power to depicting his actual likeness. But representation matters, and viewers need to understand the complicated history of the images of Christ they consume.

Much later, anti-Semitic forces in Europe including the Nazis would attempt to divorce Jesus totally from his Judaism in favor of an Aryan stereotype.

Edited by redtail hawk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, sherpa said:

Jesus gender has nothing to do with his divinity.

Jesus was on earth as a human.

His divinity is completely separate.

 

The Bible, whether in Hebrew, Greek, Latin or English uses the language of the time.

It has noting to do with God's relating any gender.

 

 

This would place you outside of the orthodox Christian tradition, specifically the findings of the Council of Ephesus against the heresy of Nestorianism. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, LeviF said:

 

This would place you outside of the orthodox Christian tradition, specifically the findings of the Council of Ephesus against the heresy of Nestorianism. 

 

I'm not certain what you are claiming here, but to make it clear, I am completely OK with Jesus joint existence as God and human, if that is your complaint.

Not of fan of the early Gnostic beliefs, or others that claimed separation.

Either way Jesus was presented as male during his human existence, but God has no gender.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, sherpa said:

 

I'm not certain what you are claiming here, but to make it clear, I am completely OK with Jesus joint existence as God and human, if that is your complaint.

Not of fan of the early Gnostic beliefs, or others that claimed separation.

Either way Jesus was presented as male during his human existence, but God has no gender.


Yes the issue at hand at Ephesus was whether the divine and human natures of Jesus of Nazareth were separate, thereby rendering Mary “mother of Christ,” as Nestorius and his followers claimed, rather than “mother of God” as the church had begun to refer to her. The council ruled against Nestorius and re-affirmed that Christ had two distinct, not separate, natures in union together in one person. 
 

As far as “gender” of God goes no, God does not have a male or female “gender” like we are born with. God, in the Christian tradition, is spirit and ultimately only is human in the united God-Man Christ (and even then in a way unique to him).  But God refers to himself almost exclusively using masculine language, including “man of war,” “Father,” “Son (in the person of Christ),” etc. God is referred to as “Father” over 150 times in the Bible, by my count. The creeds of the church, liturgy, tradition all reflect this. As pointed out by someone upthread, Jesus himself instructed his followers to address God as “Father.” 
 

On the other hand, if the Anglicans wish to further distance themselves from the historical Christian tradition, well I suppose that will be about as on brand as it gets lol

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, LeviF said:


Yes the issue at hand at Ephesus was whether the divine and human natures of Jesus of Nazareth were separate, thereby rendering Mary “mother of Christ,” as Nestorius and his followers claimed, rather than “mother of God” as the church had begun to refer to her. The council ruled against Nestorius and re-affirmed that Christ had two distinct, not separate, natures in union together in one person. 

 

A simple reading of 1 John would clear up the issue.

It is suggested that the epistle, among other motivations, was written to stop the emerging Gnostic view on the issue.

I think it's interesting that he starts out by establishing his bona fides as a direct witness, not some guy who was forming a views based on current and developing opinion, ie., Gnosics of the time.

     "which we have heard, which we have seen with our eyes, which we have looked upon, and our hands have handled,...."

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, redtail hawk said:

representation matters and can and has been used for nefarious purposes.

https://www.britannica.com/story/the-long-history-of-how-jesus-came-to-resemble-a-whiteeuropean

 

Scholar Edward J. Blum and Paul Harvey argue that in the centuries after European colonization of the Americas, the image of a white Christ associated him with the logic of empire and could be used to justify the oppression of Native and African Americans.

In a multiracial but unequal America, there was a disproportionate representation of a white Jesus in the media. It wasn’t only Warner Sallman’s Head of Christ that was depicted widely; a large proportion of actors who have played Jesus on television and film have been white with blue eyes.

Pictures of Jesus historically have served many purposes, from symbolically presenting his power to depicting his actual likeness. But representation matters, and viewers need to understand the complicated history of the images of Christ they consume.

Much later, anti-Semitic forces in Europe including the Nazis would attempt to divorce Jesus totally from his Judaism in favor of an Aryan stereotype.

This Paul Harvey?  Heah. His statements on "If I was the devil" is Epic.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S9NoQHgjM_0

 

If I were the Devil
If I were the Devil

If I were the Prince of Darkness,
I'd want to engulf the whole world in darkness
And I'd have a third of its real estate
And four-fifths of its population
But I wouldn't be happy until I had seized
The ripest apple on the tree – thee
So I'd set about however necessary to take over the United States
I'd subvert the churches first
I'd begin with a campaign of whispers
With the wisdom of a serpent,
I would whisper to you as I whispered to Eve
"Do as you please"
To the young I would whisper that the Bible is a myth
I would convince them that man created
God instead of the other way around
I would confide that what's bad is good and what's good is square
And the old, I would teach to pray after me
Our Father – which art in Washington
And then I'd get organized
I'd educate authors in
How to make Lurid literature exciting
So that anything else would appear dull and uninteresting
I'd threaten TV with dirtier movies and vice versa
I'd peddle narcotics to whom I could
I'd sell alcohol to ladies and gentlemen of distinction
I'd tranquilize the rest with pills
If I were the Devil I'd soon have families at war with themselves
Churches at war with themselves
And nations at war with themselves
Until each in it's turn, was consumed
And with promises of higher ratings,
I'd have mesmerizing media fanning the flames

If I were the Devil I would encourage schools
To refine young intellects
But neglect to discipline emotions, just let those run wild!
Until before you knew it
You'd have to have drug sniffing dogs
And metal detectors at every schoolhouse door
Within a decade
I'd have prisons overflowing
I'd have judges promoting pornography
Soon I could evict God from the courthouse
Then from the schoolhouse
And then from the houses of congress
And in His own churches I would substitute psychology
For religion and deify science
I would lure priests and pastors into
Misusing boys and girls and church money
If I were the Devil
I'd make the symbol of Easter an egg
And the symbol of Christmas a bottle
If I were the Devil, I would take from those who have
And give to those who wanted
Until I had killed the incentive of the ambitious
What will you bet
I could get whole states to promote gambling, as the way to get rich
I would caution against extremes
In hard work, in patriotism, in moral conduct
I would convince the young that marriage is old fashioned
That swinging is more fun
That what you see on TV
Is the way to be
And thus, I could undress you in public
And I could lure you into bed
With diseases for which there is no cure
In other words, if I were the Devil
I'd just keep right on doing what he's doing

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Chris farley said:

This Paul Harvey?  Heah. His statements on "If I was the devil" is Epic.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S9NoQHgjM_0

 

If I were the Devil
If I were the Devil

If I were the Prince of Darkness,
I'd want to engulf the whole world in darkness
And I'd have a third of its real estate
And four-fifths of its population
But I wouldn't be happy until I had seized
The ripest apple on the tree – thee
So I'd set about however necessary to take over the United States
I'd subvert the churches first
I'd begin with a campaign of whispers
With the wisdom of a serpent,
I would whisper to you as I whispered to Eve
"Do as you please"
To the young I would whisper that the Bible is a myth
I would convince them that man created
God instead of the other way around
I would confide that what's bad is good and what's good is square
And the old, I would teach to pray after me
Our Father – which art in Washington
And then I'd get organized
I'd educate authors in
How to make Lurid literature exciting
So that anything else would appear dull and uninteresting
I'd threaten TV with dirtier movies and vice versa
I'd peddle narcotics to whom I could
I'd sell alcohol to ladies and gentlemen of distinction
I'd tranquilize the rest with pills
If I were the Devil I'd soon have families at war with themselves
Churches at war with themselves
And nations at war with themselves
Until each in it's turn, was consumed
And with promises of higher ratings,
I'd have mesmerizing media fanning the flames

If I were the Devil I would encourage schools
To refine young intellects
But neglect to discipline emotions, just let those run wild!
Until before you knew it
You'd have to have drug sniffing dogs
And metal detectors at every schoolhouse door
Within a decade
I'd have prisons overflowing
I'd have judges promoting pornography
Soon I could evict God from the courthouse
Then from the schoolhouse
And then from the houses of congress
And in His own churches I would substitute psychology
For religion and deify science
I would lure priests and pastors into
Misusing boys and girls and church money
If I were the Devil
I'd make the symbol of Easter an egg
And the symbol of Christmas a bottle
If I were the Devil, I would take from those who have
And give to those who wanted
Until I had killed the incentive of the ambitious
What will you bet
I could get whole states to promote gambling, as the way to get rich
I would caution against extremes
In hard work, in patriotism, in moral conduct
I would convince the young that marriage is old fashioned
That swinging is more fun
That what you see on TV
Is the way to be
And thus, I could undress you in public
And I could lure you into bed
With diseases for which there is no cure
In other words, if I were the Devil
I'd just keep right on doing what he's doing

And?...Is incredibly prophetic and insightful.  Freewill is part of the equation.  I don't agree with all his points here but I do agree with many.  Seems like the kinda guy I'd trust to discern the evolution of Bee Gee Jesus.

Edited by redtail hawk
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:

And?...Is incredibly prophetic and insightful.  Freewill is part of the equation.  I don't agree with all his points here but I do agree with many.  Seems like the kinda guy I'd trust to discern the evolution of Bee Gee Jesus.

he did that in 1965. thats the crazy part.

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Chris farley said:

This Paul Harvey?  Heah. His statements on "If I was the devil" is Epic.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S9NoQHgjM_0

 

If I were the Devil
If I were the Devil

If I were the Prince of Darkness,
I'd want to engulf the whole world in darkness
And I'd have a third of its real estate
And four-fifths of its population
But I wouldn't be happy until I had seized
The ripest apple on the tree – thee
So I'd set about however necessary to take over the United States
I'd subvert the churches first
I'd begin with a campaign of whispers
With the wisdom of a serpent,
I would whisper to you as I whispered to Eve
"Do as you please"
To the young I would whisper that the Bible is a myth
I would convince them that man created
God instead of the other way around
I would confide that what's bad is good and what's good is square
And the old, I would teach to pray after me
Our Father – which art in Washington
And then I'd get organized
I'd educate authors in
How to make Lurid literature exciting
So that anything else would appear dull and uninteresting
I'd threaten TV with dirtier movies and vice versa
I'd peddle narcotics to whom I could
I'd sell alcohol to ladies and gentlemen of distinction
I'd tranquilize the rest with pills
If I were the Devil I'd soon have families at war with themselves
Churches at war with themselves
And nations at war with themselves
Until each in it's turn, was consumed
And with promises of higher ratings,
I'd have mesmerizing media fanning the flames

If I were the Devil I would encourage schools
To refine young intellects
But neglect to discipline emotions, just let those run wild!
Until before you knew it
You'd have to have drug sniffing dogs
And metal detectors at every schoolhouse door
Within a decade
I'd have prisons overflowing
I'd have judges promoting pornography
Soon I could evict God from the courthouse
Then from the schoolhouse
And then from the houses of congress
And in His own churches I would substitute psychology
For religion and deify science
I would lure priests and pastors into
Misusing boys and girls and church money
If I were the Devil
I'd make the symbol of Easter an egg
And the symbol of Christmas a bottle
If I were the Devil, I would take from those who have
And give to those who wanted
Until I had killed the incentive of the ambitious
What will you bet
I could get whole states to promote gambling, as the way to get rich
I would caution against extremes
In hard work, in patriotism, in moral conduct
I would convince the young that marriage is old fashioned
That swinging is more fun
That what you see on TV
Is the way to be
And thus, I could undress you in public
And I could lure you into bed
With diseases for which there is no cure
In other words, if I were the Devil
I'd just keep right on doing what he's doing

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...