YoloinOhio Posted August 1, 2022 Author Share Posted August 1, 2022 Why? because he’s a serial predator? 3 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gugny Posted August 1, 2022 Share Posted August 1, 2022 7 minutes ago, Chaos said: Why? Optics. This whole thing has been a sham from the get-go and it was going to be Goodell's decision all along. The NFL is scummy. 4 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ScottLaw Posted August 1, 2022 Share Posted August 1, 2022 Those massages are going to be awkward as ***** from now on. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Araiza Curse Posted August 1, 2022 Share Posted August 1, 2022 1 minute ago, Mango said: This gets parroted a lot and I don't get it. You don't need to be charged with a crime for your employer to fire or suspend you. Of course not, but it’s a business and the NFL has clearly already crunched the numbers. They know they will not lose much money compared to what Watson will generate. If they truly thought this would affect the bottom line, he would be banned from the league. 1 minute ago, Gugny said: Optics. This whole thing has been a sham from the get-go and it was going to be Goodell's decision all along. The NFL is scummy. Everyone says this, and yet here we all are. Until people turn off the set and stop buying tickets and merch, it means nothing. 2 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted August 1, 2022 Share Posted August 1, 2022 3 minutes ago, Gugny said: Optics. This whole thing has been a sham from the get-go and it was going to be Goodell's decision all along. The NFL is scummy. You say that like it's a bad thing. This guy shouldn't see the field this year. Dirtbag of dirtbags. 2 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gugny Posted August 1, 2022 Share Posted August 1, 2022 3 minutes ago, YoloinOhio said: Why? because he’s a serial predator? Four men found trembling in the fetal position at FirstEnergy Stadium: https://www.pfats.com/member-directory/cleveland-browns/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YoloinOhio Posted August 1, 2022 Author Share Posted August 1, 2022 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Araiza Curse Posted August 1, 2022 Share Posted August 1, 2022 Just now, Joe in Winslow said: You say that like it's a bad thing. This guy shouldn't see the field this year. Dirtbag of dirtbags. So the “NFL is scummy” employer of dirt bags. This is a shared sentiment right? But GO Bills!? Lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DJB Posted August 1, 2022 Share Posted August 1, 2022 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted August 1, 2022 Share Posted August 1, 2022 1 minute ago, IronMaidenBills said: So the “NFL is scummy” employer of dirt bags. This is a shared sentiment right? But GO Bills!? Lol Every employer has the chance to employ dirtbags. It's part of the human experience. It's what you DO when the dirtbags show themselves to be dirtbags that matters. This Sue L. Robinson went easy on the dirtbag. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GunnerBill Posted August 1, 2022 Share Posted August 1, 2022 7 minutes ago, YoloinOhio said: If the report of the failed settlement talks are true the nfl wants 12 games And I think that is the upper limit of what Goodell would now feel comfortable doing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DJB Posted August 1, 2022 Share Posted August 1, 2022 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Araiza Curse Posted August 1, 2022 Share Posted August 1, 2022 1 minute ago, DJB said: I would be extremely surprised that the NFL will appeal. Why hiring a 3rd party judge to oversee the decision if you were wanting to do the year? Why even bring in a judge if you aren’t going to follow the judgement? Such a waste of theatrics. 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YoloinOhio Posted August 1, 2022 Author Share Posted August 1, 2022 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Araiza Curse Posted August 1, 2022 Share Posted August 1, 2022 1 minute ago, Joe in Winslow said: Every employer has the chance to employ dirtbags. It's part of the human experience. It's what you DO when the dirtbags show themselves to be dirtbags that matters. This Sue L. Robinson went easy on the dirtbag. It doesn’t matter what the public thinks. The NFL made that clear when they hired the judge. If the NFL cared about public opinion, they would have acted independently. I would be extremely shocked if they appeal the decisions after going through all this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeviF Posted August 1, 2022 Share Posted August 1, 2022 1 minute ago, DJB said: "Nonviolent sexual conduct." But also "egregious." So this implies that there is wrongful sexual conduct that does not involve violence or the threat thereof. Interesting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gugny Posted August 1, 2022 Share Posted August 1, 2022 4 minutes ago, Joe in Winslow said: You say that like it's a bad thing. This guy shouldn't see the field this year. Dirtbag of dirtbags. We're on the same page, Joe. I've been saying from day one that the NFL should ban this sexual predator for life. But they never intended to even suspend him for a season. This is why I say they're scummy. They've been protecting killers, woman abusers and sexual predators for decades. Scum. 5 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
78thealltimegreat Posted August 1, 2022 Share Posted August 1, 2022 I think Roger pushes for 10. He literally suspended Calvin Ridley a year for freaking Draft Kings Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chaos Posted August 1, 2022 Share Posted August 1, 2022 Are there any employers outside of the entertainment industry that have "suspensions" or "fines" for employees for personal conduct outside of work.. Don't they just typical fire people or stay out of it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YoloinOhio Posted August 1, 2022 Author Share Posted August 1, 2022 1 minute ago, IronMaidenBills said: I would be extremely surprised that the NFL will appeal. Why hiring a 3rd party judge to oversee the decision if you were wanting to do the year? Why even bring in a judge if you aren’t going to follow the judgement? Such a waste of theatrics. They didn’t hire the 3rd party judge just for this case. It’s the new disciplinary process that was negotiated by the nflpa into to the last CBA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts