Jump to content

Seven Subpoenaed in Fulton County Grand Jury Investigation Investigating Trump's Attempts to Overturn the 2020 Election


Recommended Posts

31 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

It's not Washington, it's Georgia 

 

And I sure hope you are Trump's defense attorney! 


Nah, they are able to string multiple sentences together without embarrassing themselves so they are way overqualified to be among Trump’s current attorneys.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:

No you don’t…. He’d go to jail in that case because I’m not a defense attorney 

 

…and then you’d have nothing to obsess about…

You are the obsessed one. Defending a criminal as if he is the victim. Sad 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • 4 weeks later...
6 minutes ago, BillStime said:

 

As with so many things, I’m not sure what you think any of this means. Trump’s very comments prove that he wasn’t asking anyone to cheat or fabricate false votes. He simply doesn’t believe the election was valid. He’s entitled to his own opinion. 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

As with so many things, I’m not sure what you think any of this means. Trump’s very comments prove that he wasn’t asking anyone to cheat or fabricate false votes. He simply doesn’t believe the election was valid. He’s entitled to his own opinion. 


image.thumb.jpeg.39dbb07dda00f90450cf6398662c6a00.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...
5 minutes ago, BillStime said:

A second call from Trump? And..... not a peep from the cult, right @BillsFanNC?

 

This screams intent, right @Doc?

 

 

is that from the one with that crazy lady that was bragging on media about putting trump under oath?

 

Wait, never mind. that was the one that was Dissolved in January after issuing the report vs indictments.

 

And like usual, its an entire story based off unnamed sources.

 

you got him this time though.  thats for sure.

 

 

Edited by Chris farley
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Chris farley said:

is that from the one with that crazy lady that was bragging on media about putting trump under oath?

 

Wait, never mind. that was the one that was Dissolved in January after issuing the report vs indictments.

 

And like usual, its an entire story based off unnamed sources.

 

you got him this time though.  thats for sure.

 

 

 

Ah, yes, CF here to quickly attempt to clean up another mess on aisle 45.  Hysterical.

 

But I guess you didn't read the article, either.... I can't wait for this audio to be released and upstage you for he billionth time.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Chris farley said:

is that from the one with that crazy lady that was bragging on media about putting trump under oath?

 

Wait, never mind. that was the one that was Dissolved in January after issuing the report vs indictments.

 

And like usual, its an entire story based off unnamed sources.

 

you got him this time though.  thats for sure.

 

It's more of the same: full of sound and fury but signifying nothing.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • 2 months later...
50 minutes ago, Chris farley said:

IF state department Jen (MSNBC) say so. it must be fact.

 

LOL

 

I mean, it's a pretty simple thing to verify.  Not a lot of confusion on who appointed judges.

  • Eyeroll 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, cle23 said:

 

I mean, it's a pretty simple thing to verify.  Not a lot of confusion on who appointed judges.

if its assumed republican appointed judges are biased for the right.

 

the same argument would hold for DEM appointed judges.

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Chris farley said:

if its assumed republican appointed judges are biased for the right.

 

the same argument would hold for DEM appointed judges.

 

 

 

 

 

And both these assumptions would be wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Chris farley said:

So, mentioning how many judges are republican appointed means absolutely nothing?

 

And Jen(MSNBC) was just spreading conspiracies as usual?

 

 

 

 

 

I'd say that it's helpful context to help educate those that are gullible enough to believe that judges just go for whichever party appointed them. 

 

Then again, most of those people are probably past the point of being educated anyway...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ChiGoose said:

 

I'd say that it's helpful context to help educate those that are gullible enough to believe that judges just go for whichever party appointed them. 

 

Then again, most of those people are probably past the point of being educated anyway...

Crazy How MSNBC and Jen are just openly stating that like its NEWS.

 

educated, probably. 

 

but the one that posted it kind of proves it's never too late to create current thing parrots.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Chris farley said:

but the one that posted it kind of proves it's never too late to create current thing parrots.

 

 

 

Ah. I see you are upset that time is linear. Sorry about that bud, but when things happen, people talk about them. When another thing happens later, people talk about that thing too. Can't really do much about it.

  • Vomit 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Chris farley said:

if its assumed republican appointed judges are biased for the right.

 

the same argument would hold for DEM appointed judges.

 

 

 

 

 

Right, and a ton of the right's argument is always how biased certain parts of the government are, and how corrupt they are towards the left.  Sot he statement was just to throw that aspect of the argument out the window.

  • Vomit 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
On 7/18/2023 at 2:47 PM, ChiGoose said:

 

Ah. I see you are upset that time is linear. Sorry about that bud, but when things happen, people talk about them. When another thing happens later, people talk about that thing too. Can't really do much about it.

 

Bloviating King!

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Chris farley said:

If the highly respected Meidastouch group thinks so.

 

maybe a special investigator can get her indicted for her speech as well.

 

 

 

 

 

Oh, sorry - you must have missed MTG's press release in the article - but here is the PDF:


Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) Releases Statement on Georgia's Electoral College Vote | Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene (house.gov)

 

mtg-electors-press-release.webp

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
×
×
  • Create New...