Jump to content

January 6th 2021 FEDSURRECTION: The Corrupt Biden Regime: White House, FBI, DOJ, media, committee


BillsFanNC

Recommended Posts

https://www.cnn.com/2022/04/15/politics/mike-lee-chip-roy-text-messages-jan-6-mark-meadows-overturn-election/

 

Let's set aside for just one moment whether this was a "peaceful assembly that got just a tiny bit out of hand" or an out-and-out "insurrection."

 

Maybe a minor point, but it bothers me: Mark Meadows was White House Chief of Staff. Not a Trump 2020 Campaign Official. He--and other White House (not campaign) officials--was using your taxpayer-funded position to encourage the Senate to refuse to count state-certified electoral votes.

 

I realize that the last couple decades (maybe longer) have seen an ever-increasing blurring of the line between campaign staff and White House (publicly-funded) staff, but this is the first time we've seen it go quite this far. We were all paying the salaries of some White House staffers who spent their work hours trying to overturn electoral results.

  • Dislike 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, BillStime said:

 

Yeah hypocrisy - the party of family values

 

 

 

 

The fact you can't tell that is clearly fake- not even a good fake- is so sad. The two women are clearly photoshopped along with the Biden banner. 

  • Haha (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Buffalo Timmy said:

The fact you can't tell that is clearly fake- not even a good fake- is so sad. The two women are clearly photoshopped along with the Biden banner. 

 

"@jethrostudio" also kind of gives it away...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Buffalo Timmy said:

The fact you can't tell that is clearly fake- not even a good fake- is so sad. The two women are clearly photoshopped along with the Biden banner. 

 

21 minutes ago, Doc said:

 

"@jethrostudio" also kind of gives it away...

 

And we are all supposed to be in a cult?

 

What a friggin simpleton.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Billstime = 🐿️ 🐿️ 🐿️

 

 

Back to the J6 thread

 

April 16, 2022

Will J6 Be Remembered More Like the Boston Massacre?

FTA:

 

Did anybody in that crowd — many of whom were retirees welcomed into the Capitol Building by Capitol Police — actually believe that an "insurrection" was taking place?  The answer to all three questions is a demonstrable, "No!"  But to a federal government addicted to lying about absolutely anything, the "violent attack" on the Capitol was every bit as bad as 9/11, Pearl Harbor, and the Civil War.  I don't know what's worse — that our government engages in such blatant propaganda against its citizens or that it can no longer be shamed into retracting its propaganda once its lies get called out.  

 

 

Words matter.  They set verbal place markers for the important events through our history, and I do not like this new linguistic gauntlet being cavalierly thrown down by our government.  If an unarmed group of patriotic tourists waving American flags constitutes an "insurrection," then nearly any kind of rollicking assembly of citizen protesters can be deemed an "insurrection."  

 

If free speech, public assembly, and petitioning government authorities for redress of grievances become "treasonous" whenever those same authorities feel disrespected or threatened, then most all political speech and passionate assembly (directed against the government) become acts of "rebellion."  

 

And if anything can be so easily deemed "rebellion," then the federal government burns all the middle ground between peaceful resistance and forceful revolution.  

 

By treating as an "act of war" what should have been rebuked no more severely than would have any other political rally morphing into something between the equivalent of a college naked-mile-run and an illicit riot, the U.S. government pushes citizens' backs up against the wall.  People will think twice before they protest the federal government, but because protest is now synonymous with "insurrection," once people commit to the former, they will be prepared for the latter, too.  I'd say that's a pretty dangerous place marker for our country going forward.

 

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2022/04/will_j6_be_remembered_more_like_the_boston_massacre.html

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, DRsGhost said:

Yep. Absolutely zero critical thinking skills.

 

Yup, just the opposite.  "Hillary lost when she was all but assured of winning?!  Yes, yes, it MUST be Trump colluding with the Russians!"

 

Friggin' morons. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 2
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Doc said:

 

Yup, just the opposite.  "Hillary lost when she was all but assured of winning?!  Yes, yes, it MUST be Trump colluding with the Russians!"

 

Friggin' morons. 

 

But Trump did collude with Russia.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

The most brilliant colludist of all time.  All that colluding in plain sight, so tactical, so brilliant that every liberal knows it but law enforcement and the Mueller tribunal were stymied.   
 

🤣

 

image.thumb.jpeg.8ea4df8f1697e3ec2b8b097ad15a04ec.jpeg

 

Mueller - “If we had confidence the president had clearly not committed a crime, we would have said so.”

 

But you keep spinning...

 

 

Edited by BillStime
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, BillStime said:

 

image.thumb.jpeg.8ea4df8f1697e3ec2b8b097ad15a04ec.jpeg

 

Mueller - “If we had confidence the president had clearly not committed a crime, we would have said so.”

 

But you keep spinning...

 

 

Thankfully, as a society  most of us have moved past the ignorance of our ancestors.  
 

We said good-bye to Purity Tests,  Chastity Belts and the Salem Witch Trial model of justice.   
 

Still, old-timers like Mueller can roll out “We didn’t not not find evidence of guilt” to appeal to people of a certain point of view.  
 

Why?  Because some people can be convinced that something is true in spite of mountains of evidence, millions of dollars spent and several years of investigation clearly indicating that it is not.
 

By the way, if I had confidence you could comprehend  the immense and irrefutable chasm  between “evidence of a crime” and “evidence of innocence”, I would say so. 

  • Eyeroll 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

Thankfully, as a society  most of us have moved past the ignorance of our ancestors.  
 

We said good-bye to Purity Tests,  Chastity Belts and the Salem Witch Trial model of justice.   
 

Still, old-timers like Mueller can roll out “We didn’t not not find evidence of guilt” to appeal to people of a certain point of view.  
 

Why?  Because some people can be convinced that something is true in spite of mountains of evidence, millions of dollars spent and several years of investigation clearly indicating that it is not.
 

By the way, if I had confidence you could comprehend  the immense and irrefutable chasm  between “evidence of a crime” and “evidence of innocence”, I would say so. 

 

SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE UNITED STATES SENATE ON RUSSIAN ACTIVE MEASURES CAMPAIGNS AND INTERFERENCE IN THE 2016 U.S. ELECTION

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

The most brilliant colludist of all time.  All that colluding in plain sight, so tactical, so brilliant that every liberal knows it but law enforcement and the Mueller tribunal were stymied.   
 

🤣

 

And Trump was indicted after he was no longer President and able to be charged.  Because collusion/treason is something you just let go...

 

Friggin' morons.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://amgreatness.com/2022/04/14/the-other-fednapping-plot/

 

The Other Fednapping Plot

 

But the government not only attempted to manufacture “terrorists” in the Whitmer kidnapping hoax—the same FBI operation also tried to coax a man in Virginia to participate in the same sort of plot against Virginia Governor Ralph Northam. That scheme didn’t fully materialize, but the FBI’s attempt to pull off a similar stunt in Virginia reveals just how far agents were willing to go to bolster FBI Director Christopher Wray’s false warning that domestic extremists planned to “kill and assassinate” public officials.

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10712545/USSS-inadvertently-TIPPED-imposter-agents-sending-email-fake-police-account.html

 

'Fake' agents who 'infiltrated White House Secret Service' will be RELEASED from custody: Judge rejects ties to Pakistani intelligence after it was revealed 'imposters' were tipped off by federal agents

 

 

But yeah, whack jobs on the left, keep pushing them nuts out.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What hypocrisy could the be campaigning on?  The rioters in summer of 2020 weren't nearly as poorly treated as the J6 hallway strollers (the ones who did criminal acts are getting what they deserve) have been.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...