BillsFanNC Posted March 23, 2022 Share Posted March 23, 2022 Can't raise my hand on this one since I am a biologist. I can inform the judge if she needs guidance. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted March 23, 2022 Share Posted March 23, 2022 9 minutes ago, DRsGhost said: Can't raise my hand on this one since I am a biologist. I can inform the judge if she needs guidance. Biologist?? I thought you were a screenwriter?? And I love the new screen name and avatar Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted March 23, 2022 Share Posted March 23, 2022 3 minutes ago, Chef Jim said: Biologist?? I thought you were a screenwriter?? And I love the new screen name and avatar Oops I slipped didn't I? Now everyone knows that I'm a biologist screenwriter. How did everyone like my work on Contagion? 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boatdrinks Posted March 23, 2022 Share Posted March 23, 2022 55 minutes ago, Chef Jim said: What the ***** is wrong with how sausage is made?? Now if you had mentioned Ortolan you would have had a point. Actually how it's eaten is weirder than how it's made. Great Ortolan reference.. haven’t heard of that in awhile. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aristocrat Posted March 23, 2022 Share Posted March 23, 2022 https://www.biologyonline.com/dictionary/female 1. An individual of the sex which conceives and brings forth young, or (in a wider sense) which has an ovary and produces ova. The male and female of each living thing. (Drayton) There ya go. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoCal Deek Posted March 23, 2022 Share Posted March 23, 2022 23 minutes ago, Boatdrinks said: Great Ortolan reference.. haven’t heard of that in awhile. I might have gone with Haggis! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted March 23, 2022 Share Posted March 23, 2022 1 hour ago, John Adams said: Barrett was highly qualified. Should have been unanimous. Jackson is highly qualified. Should be unanimous. But people need to march in lock step with party. What about the guy, the one before Barrett and Jackson? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Adams Posted March 23, 2022 Share Posted March 23, 2022 31 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said: What about the guy, the one before Barrett and Jackson? Same. 1 hour ago, DRsGhost said: Oops I slipped didn't I? Now everyone knows that I'm a biologist screenwriter. How did everyone like my work on Contagion? We are leaving and never coming back.* *Until we come back. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TH3 Posted March 23, 2022 Share Posted March 23, 2022 (edited) 2 hours ago, John Adams said: Barrett was highly qualified. Should have been unanimous. Jackson is highly qualified. Should be unanimous. But people need to march in lock step with party. Barret may be "qualified" but she should not be on SCOTUS. She has a Catholic Agenda for America and she is there to put it in place - in front of the constitution. Her spitballing reason for overturning Roe? "Well....there are plenty of alternatives like Churches to care for unwanted births...." Edited March 23, 2022 by TH3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Adams Posted March 23, 2022 Share Posted March 23, 2022 (edited) 7 minutes ago, TH3 said: Barret may be "qualified" but she should not be on SCOTUS. She has a Catholic Agenda for America and she is there to put it in place - in front of the constitution. Her spitballing reason for overturning Roe? "Well....there are plenty of alternatives like Churches to care for unwanted births...." You're a moran. President picks. Senate advises and consents.* You can decide not to like her but she gets the job because she's eminently qualified, no quotes. Oh, and Roe and Casey are terrible decisions. Abortion should be legal and it should be legislatively decided as such, probably at a state level and if at a federal level, then by Congress. Not too many legal scholars will tell you Roe is well decided. It was a court bending over backwards to legislate. Casey is an inch better. *Except when McConnell says Constitution Shmonstitution. Edited March 23, 2022 by John Adams Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted March 23, 2022 Share Posted March 23, 2022 1 minute ago, John Adams said: You're a moran. President picks. Senate advises and consents.* You can decide not to like her but she gets the job because she's eminently qualified, no quotes. Oh, and Roe and Casey are terrible decisions. Abortion should be legal and it should be legislatively decided as such, probably at a state level and if at a federal level, then by Congress. *Except when McConnell says Constitution Shmonstitution. It’s better to be old than immature. Carry on kid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TH3 Posted March 23, 2022 Share Posted March 23, 2022 Just now, John Adams said: You're a moran. President picks. Senate advises and consents.* You can decide not to like her but she gets the job because she's eminently qualified, no quotes. *Except when McConnell says Constitution Shmonstitution. So this is where we are...SCOTUS candidates are cool even if they have been selected to enact an agenda first...follow the costition second? as long as the have the requsitite diplomas? Thats why they are losing credibility every day...they aren't there to interpet the law....they have been chosen to get to result... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Adams Posted March 23, 2022 Share Posted March 23, 2022 Just now, TH3 said: So this is where we are...SCOTUS candidates are cool even if they have been selected to enact an agenda first...follow the costition second? as long as the have the requsitite diplomas? Thats why they are losing credibility every day...they aren't there to interpet the law....they have been chosen to get to result... You're still a moran. Just because you keep hope of a conspiracy alive doesn't mean it's real. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted March 23, 2022 Share Posted March 23, 2022 3 minutes ago, John Adams said: You're still a moran. Just because you keep hope of a conspiracy alive doesn't mean it's real. Conspiracy? What in the world are you talking about? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TH3 Posted March 23, 2022 Share Posted March 23, 2022 Just now, Chef Jim said: Conspiracy? What in the world are you talking about? I was just going to ask the same Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Adams Posted March 23, 2022 Share Posted March 23, 2022 32 minutes ago, Chef Jim said: Conspiracy? What in the world are you talking about? "She has a Catholic Agenda for America and she is there to put it in place - in front of the constitution. " Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orlando Buffalo Posted March 23, 2022 Share Posted March 23, 2022 44 minutes ago, TH3 said: So this is where we are...SCOTUS candidates are cool even if they have been selected to enact an agenda first...follow the costition second? as long as the have the requsitite diplomas? Thats why they are losing credibility every day...they aren't there to interpet the law....they have been chosen to get to result... What decisions has she made that bolster your conspiracy theory? Or do you believe all devout catholics are bad? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted March 23, 2022 Share Posted March 23, 2022 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoCal Deek Posted March 23, 2022 Share Posted March 23, 2022 55 minutes ago, TH3 said: So this is where we are...SCOTUS candidates are cool even if they have been selected to enact an agenda first...follow the costition second? as long as the have the requsitite diplomas? Thats why they are losing credibility every day...they aren't there to interpet the law....they have been chosen to get to result... Agenda? What you call an agenda is just another persons court case. It’s all how you look at it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted March 23, 2022 Share Posted March 23, 2022 1 hour ago, TH3 said: Barret may be "qualified" but she should not be on SCOTUS. She has a Catholic Agenda for America and she is there to put it in place - in front of the constitution. Her spitballing reason for overturning Roe? "Well....there are plenty of alternatives like Churches to care for unwanted births...." And you're so certain that the 3 SCOTUS' appointed by Dem Presidents don't have an agenda? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts