Jump to content

Random Political Thoughts Inc.


T&C

Recommended Posts

34 minutes ago, Roundybout said:

 

 

Just another lie from Roundy,  no surprise.

 

3 guys try to carjack a vehicle, and agents in her entourage shoot at them.

 

No "attack", but leftist lie, what are you going to do.

 

 

.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Roundybout said:

Reads like the normal Car robberies in that area.

 

The agents, assigned to protect Naomi Biden, were out with her in the Georgetown neighborhood late Sunday night when they saw the three people breaking a window of the parked and unoccupied SUV, the official said. The official could not discuss details of the investigation publicly and spoke to the AP on Monday on the condition of anonymity.

One of the agents opened fire, but no one was struck by the gunfire, the Secret Service said in a statement. The three people were seen fleeing in a red car, and the Secret Service said it put out a regional bulletin to Metropolitan Police to be on the lookout for it.

 

It was unoccupied.  

 

Washington has seen a significant rise in the number of carjackings and car thefts this year. Police have reported more than 750 carjackings this year and more than 6,000 reports of stolen vehicles in the district. U.S. Rep. Henry Cuellar of Texas was carjacked near the Capitol last month by three armed assailants, who stole his car but didn’t physically harm him.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

Just another lie from Roundy,  no surprise.

 

3 guys try to carjack a vehicle, and agents in her entourage shoot at them.

 

No "attack", but leftist lie, what are you going to do.

 

 

.


Right wingers do have a bit of a track record recently. Ask Gretchen Whitmer and Nancy Pelosi’s husband. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Roundybout said:


Right wingers do have a bit of a track record recently. Ask Gretchen Whitmer and Nancy Pelosi’s husband. 

yeah, you should research into Whitmer and why the case collapsed.

 

https://www.cnn.com/2023/09/15/politics/gretchen-whitmer-michigan-kidnapping-plot/index.html

 

But the fact is it was just another unoccupied vehicle break in, in an area known for them.

 

the only difference they have these armed people that will shoot at someone for breaking into a vehicle.

 

Imagine if us or any other cop pulled that one.

 

Glad no one was hurt.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Roundybout said:


Right wingers do have a bit of a track record recently. Ask Gretchen Whitmer and Nancy Pelosi’s husband. 

 

 

So, you admit you were making it up. . . . . . great.

 

 

 

Meanwhile,

 

I'm going to hell.

 

 

F-xlcQhXIAALxzX?format=jpg&name=900x900

 

 

 

.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Doc said:

Are they gonna sue the secret service SUV maker for making them too desirable to steal?

Welp.  A High country or Executive package brings them into the 100K range.

 

IT probably sat out like beacon at 2AM on a weekend.

 

 

Its funny how the left is trying to imply she was targeted.

 

 

Nope, just the same crime the rest of us deal with.

 

but we dont have guards or allowed to just open up on someone for breaking a window.

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

NEXT SUPREME COURT TERM: It could be a very difficult one for supporters of the Administrative State

 two cases that will be argued in January 2024 are especially important.

 

“The two most-watched cases, Relentless Inc. v. Department of Commerce (court file 22-1219) and Loper Bright Enterprises Inc. v. Raimondo (court file 22-451), will be heard back-to-back on Jan. 17.

 

“In Relentless and Loper Bright, the court may narrow the application of the so-called Chevron deference doctrine that the Supreme Court articulated in the 1984 landmark ruling, Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC).

 

“In Chevron, the court held that while courts ‘must give effect to the unambiguously expressed intent of Congress,’ where courts find ‘Congress has not directly addressed the precise question at issue’ and ‘the statute is silent or ambiguous with respect to the specific issue, the question for the court is whether the agency’s answer is based on a permissible construction of the statute.’

 

“In other words, Chevron stands for the proposition that when the meaning of a statute is unclear, an executive agency’s interpretation of a statute it administers is entitled to deference unless Congress has said otherwise.”

 

 

 

Well maybe not much longer.

 

https://www.theepochtimes.com/us/supreme-court-schedules-oral-argument-in-challenge-to-bureaucrats-power-5531659?ea_src=frontpage&ea_med=lead-special-judiciary-medium-0

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/15/2023 at 10:31 AM, B-Man said:

 

 

 

                               F-8Kdf1W4AAuvxT?format=jpg&name=small

 

 

.

Science doesn't give a F@#k what you believe, Nurse Hatchet

27 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

 

 

The comments are about what you would expect from leftist juveniles 

 

 

.

WWMD = what would MAGAs do/say if he was a black man arrested for killing a white man and was stabbed in prison?  think you're a  better human?  Think again.

Edited by Joe Ferguson forever
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, SCBills said:

Derek Chauvin is a political prisoner 

splain...convicted by a jury of his peers.

 

What parts of this piece do u disagree with, specifically?

 

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/11/01/us/derek-chauvin-trial-jury.html

Edited by Joe Ferguson forever
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have noticed something odd over the past few years with my students, and even my son to a lesser extent. They are getting better at seeing obvious lies from politicians but they often immediately go to the thought that the opposite must be true, a very binary thought process. One of the topics that has come up is Ukraine, which since each side lies so much the kids argue by just pointing out each lie. I have had to shut it down several times and keep trying to get kids to see more nuance. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Orlando Tim said:

I have noticed something odd over the past few years with my students, and even my son to a lesser extent. They are getting better at seeing obvious lies from politicians but they often immediately go to the thought that the opposite must be true, a very binary thought process. One of the topics that has come up is Ukraine, which since each side lies so much the kids argue by just pointing out each lie. I have had to shut it down several times and keep trying to get kids to see more nuance. 

because you seem so adept at seeing in shades of gray🤣 and issues of relativity.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:

splain...convicted by a jury of his peers.

 

What parts of this piece do u disagree with, specifically?

 

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/11/01/us/derek-chauvin-trial-jury.html


Zero chance he was ever going to not take the fall for the racial justice movement in that moment. 
 

George Floyd died from a fentanyl overdose, and we all know this .. even the jury … even you. 

  • Disagree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, SCBills said:


Zero chance he was ever going to not take the fall for the racial justice movement in that moment. 
 

George Floyd died from a fentanyl overdose, and we all know this .. even the jury … even you. 

he died from asphyxiation.  r u a pathologist?  coroner?  the jury nor I know nothing of the sort....

 

https://www.factcheck.org/2023/11/no-change-in-george-floyds-cause-of-death-despite-viral-false-claims/

 

The county medical examiner who conducted the autopsy listed Floyd’s death as a homicideand determined that the cause was “cardiopulmonary arrest complicating law enforcement subdual, restraint, and neck compression.”

This finding was highlighted in the first set of charges leveled against Chauvin in May 2020 and was explained in detail by the medical examiner, Dr. Andrew Baker, during Chauvin’s trial.

“The top line of the cause of death is really what you think is the most important thing that precipitated the death. Other things that you think played a role in the death but were not direct causes get relegated to what’s known as the ‘other significant conditions’ part of the death certificate,” Baker said at the trial, explaining why Floyd’s other health conditions weren’t included in his cause of death.

“So, the other significant conditions are things that played a role in the death, but didn’t directly cause the death,” Baker said. “So, for example, Mr. Floyd’s use of fentanyl did not cause the subdual or neck restraint; his heart disease did not cause the subdual or the neck restraint.”

 

now you show me the evidence for your case on fentanyl overdose....

Edited by Joe Ferguson forever
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:

because you seem so adept at seeing in shades of gray🤣 and issues of relativity.

Like with Ukraine where I recognize it is a corrupt country, with no national security interest but recognize they are better than the Russians? Curious if you now support Biden using the young of Ukraine to fight  what has always been an  unwinnable war?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:

he died from asphyxiation.  r u a pathologist?  coroner?  the jury nor I know nothing of the sort....

 

https://www.factcheck.org/2023/11/no-change-in-george-floyds-cause-of-death-despite-viral-false-claims/

 

The county medical examiner who conducted the autopsy listed Floyd’s death as a homicideand determined that the cause was “cardiopulmonary arrest complicating law enforcement subdual, restraint, and neck compression.”

This finding was highlighted in the first set of charges leveled against Chauvin in May 2020 and was explained in detail by the medical examiner, Dr. Andrew Baker, during Chauvin’s trial.

“The top line of the cause of death is really what you think is the most important thing that precipitated the death. Other things that you think played a role in the death but were not direct causes get relegated to what’s known as the ‘other significant conditions’ part of the death certificate,” Baker said at the trial, explaining why Floyd’s other health conditions weren’t included in his cause of death.

“So, the other significant conditions are things that played a role in the death, but didn’t directly cause the death,” Baker said. “So, for example, Mr. Floyd’s use of fentanyl did not cause the subdual or neck restraint; his heart disease did not cause the subdual or the neck restraint.”

 

now you show me the evidence for your case on fentanyl overdose....


You don’t need to watch the film, but this article outlines quite a bit that went on to make sure this would be Chauvin’s fate.  
 

A sacrifice to the mob… those like you.  
 

Go ahead, cheer, you’ve got your pound of flesh. 
 

https://nypost.com/2023/11/20/opinion/real-truth-aid-the-floyd-lies/amp/

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...