The January 6th Commission To Investigate The Insurrection

[BillStime]

 

The entire Flynn family needs to be investigated; again.

 

 

 

[BillStime]

8 hours ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:

Did the insurrection 2.0 happen today?

CNN told me it’s coming 

 

Question for you:

 

15 hours ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:

Is this a deliberate effort to stir the pot with disinformation?

 

[Over 29 years of fanhood]

7 hours ago, Motorin' said:

 

What did Q say? Do you have Q clearance? 

If I did I wouldn’t be allowed to watch CNN. 

1 hour ago, BillStime said:

 

Question for you:

 

 

A little. But It’s annoying the MSM continues to try and stir up rear view mirror fear distracting from reporting NOW....

 

But hey ‘it’s really good for ratings” right? Just like covid, per CEO of CNN. 

Edited March 5, 2021 by Over 29 years of fanhood

[B-Man]

 

It's impossible to do satire anymore..........

 

 

[BillStime]

1 hour ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:

If I did I wouldn’t be allowed to watch CNN. 

A little. But It’s annoying the MSM continues to try and stir up rear view mirror fear distracting from reporting NOW....

 

But hey ‘it’s really good for ratings” right? Just like covid, per CEO of CNN. 

 

You scream INDEPENDENT.

 

LMAO

 

Now do FOX News.

[Motorin']

1 hour ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:

If I did I wouldn’t be allowed to watch CNN. 

A little. But It’s annoying the MSM continues to try and stir up rear view mirror fear distracting from reporting NOW....

 

But hey ‘it’s really good for ratings” right? Just like covid, per CEO of CNN. 

 

Let's just assume Q was another libtard hoax, and get back to the things that are really important! Tan suits, mustard on hamburgers and Hillary's emails! 

 

Edited March 5, 2021 by Motorin'

[Over 29 years of fanhood]

29 minutes ago, BillStime said:

 

You scream INDEPENDENT.

 

LMAO

 

Now do FOX News.

Last I looked They’re busy crucifying Mario’s kid and relentlessly trying to find any new thing to report to avoid mentioning what they spent 4 years defending with the exception of regurgitating voter fraud stuff. 
 

But at least they are mentioning the mess created at the border due to this recent amnesty promise while their MSM counterparts are completely ignoring it.

 

In any case mindless party line sheep can’t comprehend what independent thinking means or looks like. Wouldn’t expect you to get it. 

[Over 29 years of fanhood]

20 minutes ago, Motorin' said:

 

Let's just assume Q was another libtard hoax, and get back to the things that are really important! Tan suits, mustard on hamburgers and Hillary's emails! 

 

The hoax is the attempt to brand anyone who opposes or even questions the liberal agenda as Q conspiracy theorists. That is intentionally divisive. I’m not sure why you people need to do that. 

Edited March 5, 2021 by Over 29 years of fanhood

[BillStime]

6 minutes ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:

Last I looked They’re busy crucifying Mario’s kid and relentlessly trying to find any new thing to report to avoid mentioning what they spent 4 years defending with the exception of regurgitating voter fraud stuff. 
 

But at least they are mentioning the mess created at the border due to this recent amnesty promise while their MSM counterparts are completely ignoring it.

 

In any case mindless party line sheep can’t comprehend what independent thinking means or looks like. Wouldn’t expect you to get it. 

 

Mister Independent - what exactly did Trump do to address the border? Immigration? Central America?

[Motorin']

Just now, Over 29 years of fanhood said:

The hoax is the attempt to brand anyone who opposes the liberal agenda as Q conspiracy theorists. That is intentionally divisive. I’m not sure why you people need to do that. 

 

Here's what I would say to anyone who sees themselves as the "resistant" the the "liberal agenda." Maybe you do believe in Q, just a little bit? Maybe you didn't.  If not, why were you ok with their movement? If you weren't ok with their movement, why did you align with them? If you didn't align with them, what did you do to resist their destructive sway over your resistance? 

[Over 29 years of fanhood]

Just now, BillStime said:

 

Mister Independent - what exactly did Trump do to address the border? Immigration? Central America?

here we go again pointing to your orange obsession to justify the current state. 

 

But since you must... pretty sure he was a xenophobic racist closing borders, locking immigrant children in cages, an ICE advocate and a deportation fanatic railing against sanctuary cities and messaging the total opposite of ‘immigrants welcome’

 

I know I had a lot of trouble getting visas through for some of my team over the last 4 years and was explicitly told by immigration attorneys that administration made it a lot harder to get people in than ever.  
 

Now what I’m hearing is The promise of amnesty has been reported as overwhelming several border municipalities due to a massive increase in border crossing. Promising amnesty created a mess.  

[BillStime]

2 minutes ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:

here we go again pointing to your orange obsession to justify the current state. 

 

But since you must... pretty sure he was a xenophobic racist closing borders, locking immigrant children in cages, an ICE advocate and a deportation fanatic railing against sanctuary cities and messaging the total opposite of ‘immigrants welcome’

 

I know I had a lot of trouble getting visas through for some of my team over the last 4 years and was explicitly told by immigration attorneys that administration made it a lot harder to get people in than ever.  
 

Now what I’m hearing is The promise of amnesty has been reported as overwhelming several border municipalities due to a massive increase in border crossing. Promising amnesty created a mess.  

 

A fish rots from the head down. Why didn't Trump, in his four years, do something with Central America?  His policies did nothing to stop the problem.

 

Why is that Mister Independent?

[Over 29 years of fanhood]

18 minutes ago, Motorin' said:

 

Here's what I would say to anyone who sees themselves as the "resistant" the the "liberal agenda." Maybe you do believe in Q, just a little bit? Maybe you didn't.  If not, why were you ok with their movement? If you weren't ok with their movement, why did you align with them? If you didn't align with them, what did you do to resist their destructive sway over your resistance? 

I’m not sure what any of this really means. 
 

I believe politicians are institutionally dishonest power mongering corrupt elitists and the media are simply mouthpieces for their respective chosen side. Both party’s are more concerned about maintaining power and control than what they actually do with it. 

 

If that’s a conspiracy theory, oh well. 

8 minutes ago, BillStime said:

 

A fish rots from the head down. Why didn't Trump, in his four years, do something with Central America?  His policies did nothing to stop the problem.

 

Why is that Mister Independent?

because he was a moron I guess. Ok so what about the problem  now? 

Edited March 5, 2021 by Over 29 years of fanhood

[Doc]

3 hours ago, BillStime said:

A fish rots from the head down. Why didn't Trump, in his four years, do something with Central America?  His policies did nothing to stop the problem.

 

Why is that Mister Independent?

 

LOL!  You think anyone can stop it?  No, you can only hope to contain it.

[B-Man]

 

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/byron-yorks-daily-memo-developing-some-perspective-on-the-capitol-riot

 

 

BYRON YORK: Developing some perspective on the Capitol riot.

 

In the last few days we’ve seen a series of hearings in the House and Senate on the January 6 riot at the Capitol. After all the talk, we still don’t know some of the basic facts of the riot, especially the circumstances surrounding the death of Capitol Police Officer Brian Sicknick, the only law enforcement officer and only non-rioter to die in the violence. But in spite of the gaps in our knowledge, a sense of perspective on the riot — Who was involved? What did they think they were doing? — has begun to emerge.

 

First, the riot is often referred to as an “armed insurrection.” A search of the Nexis database of newspapers, websites, and cable news transcripts finds 2,339 times since January 6 in which the riot was described as an “armed insurrection.” On many other occasions, the rioters were described simply as “armed.” But the description requires an asterisk that is rarely, if ever, applied. A small number of the rioters did indeed have baseball bats or bear spray, and a few used flagsticks or even, in one case, a crutch as weapons to assault Capitol police. But the armed insurrectionists did not use any firearms. Before January 6, if anyone heard the phrase “armed insurrection,” he or she might have assumed guns were involved. At the Capitol riot, they weren’t.

 

 

 

The whole thing was wildly overblown to suit the Democrats’ and media’s agenda. Much of what we were told was false, and often outright dishonest. Republicans allowed themselves to be bulldozed into going along for reasons of “decency.” As usual, the decency was a sham.

 

 

 

 

 

Related: Senate Sick of FBI Stonewalling.

 

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/byron-yorks-daily-memo-senate-sick-of-fbi-stonewalling

 

 

 

 

Edited March 5, 2021 by B-Man

[BillStime]

6 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/byron-yorks-daily-memo-developing-some-perspective-on-the-capitol-riot

 

 

BYRON YORK: Developing some perspective on the Capitol riot.

 

In the last few days we’ve seen a series of hearings in the House and Senate on the January 6 riot at the Capitol. After all the talk, we still don’t know some of the basic facts of the riot, especially the circumstances surrounding the death of Capitol Police Officer Brian Sicknick, the only law enforcement officer and only non-rioter to die in the violence. But in spite of the gaps in our knowledge, a sense of perspective on the riot — Who was involved? What did they think they were doing? — has begun to emerge.

 

First, the riot is often referred to as an “armed insurrection.” A search of the Nexis database of newspapers, websites, and cable news transcripts finds 2,339 times since January 6 in which the riot was described as an “armed insurrection.” On many other occasions, the rioters were described simply as “armed.” But the description requires an asterisk that is rarely, if ever, applied. A small number of the rioters did indeed have baseball bats or bear spray, and a few used flagsticks or even, in one case, a crutch as weapons to assault Capitol police. But the armed insurrectionists did not use any firearms. Before January 6, if anyone heard the phrase “armed insurrection,” he or she might have assumed guns were involved. At the Capitol riot, they weren’t.

 

The whole thing was wildly overblown to suit the Democrats’ and media’s agenda. Much of what we were told was false, and often outright dishonest. Republicans allowed themselves to be bulldozed into going along for reasons of “decency.” As usual, the decency was a sham.

 

 

 

 

 

Related: Senate Sick of FBI Stonewalling.

 

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/byron-yorks-daily-memo-senate-sick-of-fbi-stonewalling

 

 

 

 

Unarmed... but they used whatever blunt force objects they could get their hands on to injure officers.

 

Are you excusing their behavior because they weren't armed?

 

[leh-nerd skin-erd]

12 minutes ago, BillStime said:

Unarmed... but they used whatever blunt force objects they could get their hands on to injure officers.

 

Are you excusing their behavior because they weren't armed?

 

That’s what you took from that?  
 

That media reports of “armed insurrection” were apparently false is problematic to discussion?  
 

Michael Brown was described as being unarmed and it mattered, though it’s pretty well established that beating an individual with fists, elbows can be detrimental to ones health.  
 

Why the rush to cover for inaccurate reporting? What’s in it for you? 
 

Then again maybe the people writing the story figured you would figure “Ah just give it to em”.  

[Tenhigh]

6 hours ago, BillStime said:

 

A fish rots from the head down. Why didn't Trump, in his four years, do something with Central America?  His policies did nothing to stop the problem.

 

Why is that Mister Independent?

So you are saying he should have finished the wall?  Surprising take from you. 

[BillStime]

Just now, Tenhigh said:

So you are saying he should have finished the wall?  Surprising take from you. 

Your reading comprehension sucks 

[Tenhigh]

5 minutes ago, BillStime said:

Your reading comprehension sucks 

Not really, think it through. 

[B-Man]

1 minute ago, Tenhigh said:

Not really, think it through. 

                           ^

                        I

 

There's your problem Tenhigh

 

You're asking too much of him.

 

 

 

[BillStime]

On 3/5/2021 at 6:36 PM, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

That’s what you took from that?  
 

That media reports of “armed insurrection” were apparently false is problematic to discussion?  
 

Michael Brown was described as being unarmed and it mattered, though it’s pretty well established that beating an individual with fists, elbows can be detrimental to ones health.  
 

Why the rush to cover for inaccurate reporting? What’s in it for you? 
 

Then again maybe the people writing the story figured you would figure “Ah just give it to em”.  

I’m not rushing to cover up anything - there is plenty of video of the events that transpired January 6. Our Capitol police was out manned because the Trump administration delayed to provide the necessary back up and support.

 

Don't you f’n dare question me when YOUR PARTY is responsible for the events of that day.  Don't twist any of this BS on me - armed or unarmed - what happened was a disgrace and forever stain on Trump.

 

*You* own it

 

 

Edited April 7, 2022 by BillStime

[leh-nerd skin-erd]

2 hours ago, BillStime said:

I’m not rushing to cover up anything - there is plenty of video of the events that transpired January 6. Our capital police was out manned because the Trump administration delayed to provide the necessary back up and support.

 

Don't you f’n dare question me when YOUR PARTY is responsible for the events of that day.  Don't twist any of this BS on me - armed or unarmed - what happened was a disgrace and forever stain on Trump.

 

*You* own it

 

 

 

This one is on me,  I know your posting history and should have expected this Greta Thornbergesque response.  “How daaaaaahhhhhhh youuuuuuu....”. 
 

I think a few things:

 

I think words matter, that’s why journalists use them.  You don’t care.  I do. 

I think the assault on the Capitol was horrific, the Capitol police overwhelmed, and I’m waiting to see what comes out of that.  We agree here, I think. 
 

I think DJT is down in S Florida living a pretty good life, and not charged with a crime or in jail because he’s guilty of none of the things you think he is.  I think that’s because you rush headlong, emotionally burdened, into the arms of journalists who know you don’t worry so much about details.  As a result, they treat you like an organ grinder’s monkey and more often than not, you’re going to dance. 
 

I think anarchists like anarchy, that they represent the extreme fringes of the ideological spectrum.  I know I’m a centrist, mostly, prefer law and order and that if you didn’t pop off so quickly we could probably find some common ground.  
 

Finally—and this may sound harsh— but I did. I dared to question you on why you’re dancing on the head of a pin to defend shoddy or inaccurate journalism.  

[BillStime]

1 minute ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

 

This one is on me,  I know your posting history and should have expected this Greta Thornbergesque response.  “How daaaaaahhhhhhh youuuuuuu....”. 
 

I think a few things:

 

I think words matter, that’s why journalists use them.  You don’t care.  I do. 

I think the assault on the Capitol was horrific, the Capitol police overwhelmed, and I’m waiting to see what comes out of that.  We agree here, I think. 
 

I think DJT is down in S Florida living a pretty good life, and not charged with a crime or in jail because he’s guilty of none of the things you think he is.  I think that’s because you rush headlong, emotionally burdened, into the arms of journalists who know you don’t worry so much about details.  As a result, they treat you like an organ grinder’s monkey and more often than not, you’re going to dance. 
 

I think anarchists like anarchy, that they represent the extreme fringes of the ideological spectrum.  I know I’m a centrist, mostly, prefer law and order and that if you didn’t pop off so quickly we could probably find some common ground.  
 

Finally—and this may sound harsh— but I did. I dared to question you on why you’re dancing on the head of a pin to defend shoddy or inaccurate journalism.  

 

"LOCK HER UP"

[BillStime]

10 hours ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

 

This one is on me,  I know your posting history and should have expected this Greta Thornbergesque response.  “How daaaaaahhhhhhh youuuuuuu....”. 
 

I think a few things:

 

I think words matter, that’s why journalists use them.  You don’t care.  I do. 

I think the assault on the Capitol was horrific, the Capitol police overwhelmed, and I’m waiting to see what comes out of that.  We agree here, I think. 
 

I think DJT is down in S Florida living a pretty good life, and not charged with a crime or in jail because he’s guilty of none of the things you think he is.  I think that’s because you rush headlong, emotionally burdened, into the arms of journalists who know you don’t worry so much about details.  As a result, they treat you like an organ grinder’s monkey and more often than not, you’re going to dance. 
 

I think anarchists like anarchy, that they represent the extreme fringes of the ideological spectrum.  I know I’m a centrist, mostly, prefer law and order and that if you didn’t pop off so quickly we could probably find some common ground.  
 

Finally—and this may sound harsh— but I did. I dared to question you on why you’re dancing on the head of a pin to defend shoddy or inaccurate journalism.  

 

Mmmmhmmm

 

 

[leh-nerd skin-erd]

1 hour ago, BillStime said:

 

Mmmmhmmm

 

 

Are you enjoying a pop tart or have you found a smoking gun hidden in this piece?   
 

Actually, this is the sort of piece I was referring to last night.  It starts with a headline that states, emphatically, that desperation exists.  The inference is that some highly placed source said that Rs are desperate.  In fact, it’s really just quoting the authors of the opinion piece.  Using last nights post, here would be an attention grabbing headline I might use back in my journalism days: 

 

Analysis:  BillStime “an organ grinders monkey”

 

Here’s my question based on this deep dive ‘analysis’ and misleading headline that has you ruminating this Saturday morning:
 

Why is the federal government not pursuing charges directly against DJT for his role in the insurrection?   Why have the Dems not leaked clear and specific evidence of the conspiracy involving DJT to overrun the Capitol and leave office peacefully 14 days later?
 

In the alternative, when do you think these charges are forthcoming?  
 

You can be you, think what you do and still demand reporting with a reasonable level of accuracy.  It’s a good thing to question agendas.  Or, you can let Gepetto make you think you’re a good dancer.    

[leh-nerd skin-erd]

12 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

“As the Insurrection Narrative Crumbles, Democrats Cling to it More Desperately Than Ever.”

 A new piece from Glenn Greenwald.

 

https://greenwald.substack.com/p/as-the-insurrection-narrative-crumbles

 

 

 

 

 

Wait... I thought the Republicans were the desperate ones...

I’m sure when the dust settles everyone will be right and everyone will be wrong.  We just must live out our own truth. 

[BillStime]

1 hour ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

Are you enjoying a pop tart or have you found a smoking gun hidden in this piece?   
 

Actually, this is the sort of piece I was referring to last night.  It starts with a headline that states, emphatically, that desperation exists.  The inference is that some highly placed source said that Rs are desperate.  In fact, it’s really just quoting the authors of the opinion piece.  Using last nights post, here would be an attention grabbing headline I might use back in my journalism days: 

 

Analysis:  BillStime “an organ grinders monkey”

 

Here’s my question based on this deep dive ‘analysis’ and misleading headline that has you ruminating this Saturday morning:
 

Why is the federal government not pursuing charges directly against DJT for his role in the insurrection?   Why have the Dems not leaked clear and specific evidence of the conspiracy involving DJT to overrun the Capitol and leave office peacefully 14 days later?
 

In the alternative, when do you think these charges are forthcoming?  
 

You can be you, think what you do and still demand reporting with a reasonable level of accuracy.  It’s a good thing to question agendas.  Or, you can let Gepetto make you think you’re a good dancer.    

I learn best from @B-Man

[B-Man]

 

 

TIE A PRESIDENTIAL INAUGURATION SUPPORT RIBBON

 

Tucker Carlson opened his show last night with a reported editorial that FOX News has posted under the title “The mainstream media doomsday cult and the growth of the police state” (video below). It strikes me as some kind of a classic. Excerpt:

 

Just how dangerous is QAnon? Here’s the answer: the District of Columbia National Guard announced Friday that all troops who took part in the mission to protect our democracy from internet conspiracy theorists will now receive medals in recognition of their heroic sacrifice.

 

The primary medal is called the Presidential Inauguration Support Ribbon. That’s for people who were there for President Biden’s inauguration. But that medal will be supplemented, in cases in which our heroes have earned it, by the Emergency Service Ribbon. So if you’re a D.C. Guardsman who’s been on duty in the city since late January, protecting America from Trump voters, you can add another medal to your chest. More may be coming. According to Air Force Lt. Col. Robert Carver, “Other federal decorations are also being considered.”

 

That seems like a big deal. For context, more than 60,000 American soldiers and Marines fought on Guadalcanal in the South Pacific during the Second World War. About 15,000 of them died or were wounded there. Not one of those men got an official Guadalcanal medal for the experience, because the Pentagon didn’t offer them. Guadalcanal may have been horrible and bloody, but it just didn’t justify its own ribbon. Guadalcanal wasn’t North Capitol Street. The Imperial Japanese weren’t as fanatical as Trump voters and not half as dangerous.

 

https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/tucker-carlson-mainstream-media-doomsday-cult-police-state

 

 

 

 

 

Related: “Threat to Capitol was a ‘mirage.'”

 

https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2021/03/threat-to-capitol-was-a-mirage.php

[BillStime]

Only the best

 

 

[Tiberius]

1 hour ago, BillStime said:

Only the best

 

 

These are the people they want in positions of government! Fascism is a damn ugly thing. 

 

Lock 'em up! 

[BillStime]

So the guy who does security for the trickster got arrested? 
 

Shocker
 

 

[Big Blitz]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited March 8, 2021 by Big Blitz

[BillStime]

 

[B-Man]

 

 

Will none of our 'Leaders' speak up about this idiocy !

 

 

 

[Unforgiven]

 FBI confesses to Congress that no guns have actually been recovered from the so-called Capitol siege…

 

 

Edited March 13, 2021 by Unforgiven

[Scraps]

17 minutes ago, Unforgiven said:

 FBI confesses to Congress that no guns have actually been recovered from the so-called Capitol siege…

 

 

So?

[Over 29 years of fanhood]

35 minutes ago, Unforgiven said:

 FBI confesses to Congress that no guns have actually been recovered from the so-called Capitol siege…

 

 

this can’t be right. What kind of violent extremist insurrectionist forgets to bring guns to a coup ?

[Scraps]

2 hours ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:

this can’t be right. What kind of violent extremist insurrectionist forgets to bring guns to a coup ?

A Trumptard.  It takes a special kind of stupid to fall for an obvious conman's BS, believe the election was stolen, show up in DC with helmets, body armor, tactical uniforms, bear spay, mace, baseball bats, a spear, zip ties for handcuffing people, a gallows for Mike Pence but forget to bring your gun.

[B-Man]

What Was In Ashli Babbitt’s Backpack When She Was Shot Dead by a Capitol Hill Police Officer ?

Gateway Pundit, by Tayler Hansen

 

On January 6th, 2021, Ashli Babbitt, a 14 year Air Force Veteran, was shot and killed by a Capitol Police Officer.

 

The Capitol Police continue to hide details of her shooting death from the American public..It was the only shooting incident at the US Capitol on January 6, 2021. The Officer who shot Ashli Babbit reportedly said Ashli’s backpack factored into him killing her. But what was actually inside Ashli’s backpack?

 

(Snip)

 

So does wearing a backpack give an officer an excuse to shoot you dead now? In a public statement made by the Police Officers’ Attorney, Mark Schamel, he states the backpack Ashli was wearing compounded the Officers fears.

 

It was the only shooting incident at the US Capitol on January 6, 2021.

 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/03/ashli-babbitts-backpack-shot-dead-capitol-hill-police-officer-will-shock/