Jump to content

The Vote by mail debate


Recommended Posts

Just now, SectionC3 said:

 

Because requiring the ID to vote is an impediment to voting.  Two trips instead of one.  Extra time.  In some instances, extra cost.  I hope you’re being facetious because the answer is . . . Obvious. 

 

It is obvious. Those who say voter ID is racist, or an impediment to voting, believes minorities are too dumb to get state issued IDs. White liberals proclaiming to be woke are the most racist of them all, as people like you keep proving. 

 

 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, dubs said:


Here’s an idea, and I’m just spitballing here, but why don’t we just do what we’ve been doing rather than try and rework the entire voting system in a few months. 
 

The only difference would be that you wear a mask. 
 

boom!!!  Problem solved. 

 

It’s not reworking the entire voting system.  “Vote by mail” and “vote absentee” are basically the same thing.  (In some places absentee might mean early in-person voting when the voter is to be out of town on Election Day.  New York State allows for early in-person voting, so “absentee” and “vote by mail” now are the same thing here.). It’s accounting for the time it will take to wait for the mail ballots to arrive, to open the ballots, and to run them through the “scantron.”  That’s it.  What we really need is patience to make this work smoothly.   

Just now, Deranged Rhino said:

 

It is obvious. Those who say voter ID is racist, or an impediment to voting, believes minorities are too dumb to get state issued IDs. White liberals proclaiming to be woke are the most racist of them all, as people like you keep proving. 

 

 

This is why you’re on the Washed Up Psycho List!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, SectionC3 said:

 

Because requiring the ID to vote is an impediment to voting.  Two trips instead of one.  Extra time.  In some instances, extra cost.  I hope you’re being facetious because the answer is . . . Obvious. 

 

 

Because NOT requiring ID to vote is an accessory to voter fraud.  Two votes instead of one.   I hope you’re being facetious because the threat is . . . Obvious. 

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

Because NOT requiring ID to vote is an accessory to voter fraud.  Two votes instead of one.   I hope you’re being facetious because the threat is . . . Obvious. 

 

 

 

 

It’s hard to take anything you say seriously given your fake Christianity, but this is a new level of silliness for you.  

4 hours ago, Wacka said:

Sounds like the Chewbacca defense. Do you try using it in court?

 

Sounds like we have another jellybeaner on our hands!

 

Although, as I think about it, jellybeaning might be a good plan in 2020.  I’d love to watch some of these Trumpers here try to count the jellybeans!  Turnout would reach a record low!

Edited by SectionC3
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, SectionC3 said:

 

It’s hard to take anything you say seriously given your fake Christianity, but this is a new level of silliness for you.  

 

He gets trounced in the debate and IMMEDIATELY falls back on slamming another man's religion. Why? Because he's a terrible person who's so broken and lost he thinks this makes him look strong. 

 

It doesn't. 

 

It shows the world for certain he is weak. 

 

***** off, *****. 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, SectionC3 said:

 

It’s hard to take anything you say seriously given your fake Christianity, but this is a new level of silliness for you.  

 

 

Non-response.

 

You fallback to your fake narrative when facing an idea that you can't address (honestly).

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, B-Man said:

 

 

Non-response.

 

You fallback to your fake narrative when facing an idea that you can't address (honestly).

 

 

 

 

 

 

OK.  I’ll bite.  What is accessorial liability?  And how many cases of in-person voter fraud can you point to? 

1 minute ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

He gets trounced in the debate and IMMEDIATELY falls back on slamming another man's religion. Why? Because he's a terrible person who's so broken and lost he thinks this makes him look strong. 

 

It doesn't. 

 

It shows the world for certain he is weak. 

 

***** off, *****. 

 

FYI - Mike Flynn still is guilty!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

He gets trounced in the debate and IMMEDIATELY falls back on slamming another man's religion. Why? Because he's a terrible person who's so broken and lost he thinks this makes him look strong. 

 

It doesn't. 

 

It shows the world for certain he is weak. 

 

***** off, *****. 

 

In addition to being washed up, the psycho is triggered today!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Deranged Rhino said:

 

He gets trounced in the debate and IMMEDIATELY falls back on slamming another man's religion. Why? Because he's a terrible person who's so broken and lost he thinks this makes him look strong. 

 

It doesn't. 

 

It shows the world for certain he is weak. 

 

 

There you go again with your hoaxes!

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, SectionC3 said:

 

I kind of miss having him around.  He doesn’t understand that he is the joke, which makes him that much more amusing!

 

It's not a joke. It's an insult you've leveled at B-man many times. It's beyond the pale -- but is perfectly on brand for you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Deranged Rhino said:

 

It's not a joke. It's an insult you've leveled at B-man many times. It's beyond the pale -- but is perfectly on brand for you.

 

You misunderstood.  You, sir, are the joke! 

 

(Although B-Man’s version of Christianity, which apparently involves such things as hurling paper towels at the downtrodden and caging brown migrant children at our southern border Is moving toward joke territory.)

Just now, wAcKy ZeBrA said:

Imminent

 

Good point.  By his own admission, he was deranged.  Things can get really nutty when he who is deranged also is triggered!

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, SectionC3 said:

 

You misunderstood.  You, sir, are the joke! 

 

(Although B-Man’s version of Christianity, which apparently involves such things as hurling paper towels at the downtrodden and caging brown migrant children at our southern border Is moving toward joke territory.)

 

Don't forget grabbing women by their *****.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:

 

Because requiring the ID to vote is an impediment to voting.  Two trips instead of one.  Extra time.  In some instances, extra cost.  I hope you’re being facetious because the answer is . . . Obvious. 

It's only because dems are lazy bums  that can'y be bothered spending the energy . As they said in Team America, Freedom ain't free, it costs a buck thirty-five. And America F*** Yea!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Wacka said:

It's only because dems are lazy bums  that can'y be bothered spending the energy . As they said in Team America, Freedom ain't free, it costs a buck thirty-five. And America F*** Yea!

 

Or it’s that they shouldn’t be required to spend the energy.  Either one, jellybeaner!

1 minute ago, wAcKy ZeBrA said:

 

True - forgot about that.

 

Yup.  I have never seen a fat slob sitting outside a dump that doubles as a house wearing a MAGA hat.  Not one. Single. Time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:

Although B-Man’s version of Christianity, which apparently involves such things as hurling paper towels at the downtrodden and caging brown migrant children at our southern border Is moving toward joke territory.

 

So when pray tell did you attend seminary? I figure you must have to feel you have the wherewithal to judge another's faith. Please tell us?

Edited by Cinga
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Cinga said:

 

So when pray tell did you attend seminary? I figure you must have to feel you have the wherewithal to judge another. Please tell us?

Judge not lest ye be judged does not mean that one is to ignore evil and perversion of biblical teaching.  One doesn’t need a seminary  or theological study to know that!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:

 

Or it’s that they shouldn’t be required to spend the energy.  Either one, jellybeaner!

Why are you calling me a fat Mexican?

Doubling down on the Chewbacca  Defense?

I have no idea what that means so I googled it and found in the Urban Dictionary that it means a fat Mexican. I may be fat, bit I am no Mexican.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SectionC3 said:

Because requiring the ID to vote is an impediment to voting.  Two trips instead of one.  Extra time.  In some instances, extra cost.  I hope you’re being facetious because the answer is . . . Obvious. 

 

Sorry but inconvenience is not an excuse. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Wacka said:

Why are you calling me a fat Mexican?

Doubling down on the Chewbacca  Defense?

I have no idea what that means so I googled it and found in the Urban Dictionary that it means a fat Mexican. I may be fat, bit I am no Mexican.

So funny when the mask slips and the turds to the left reveal their true vile racism.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:

 

Let’s cry some crocodile tears for the evangelical snowflakes who don’t like it when someone points out that true Christianity doesn’t support their mistreatment of the poor and brown!

 

But you see, according to the leftist ideal of unconscious bias by you're very assumption, that black and brown people don't have the ability or know how to go to the polls to vote, YOU ARE IN FACT PROVING YOUR OWN RACISM!

 

That's not by any standard I've written, it was written by your very own WOKE generation

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SectionC3 said:

 

Let’s cry some crocodile tears for the evangelical snowflakes who don’t like it when someone points out that true Christianity doesn’t support their mistreatment of the poor and brown!

So, providing poor brown kids shelter and protection from slavers is somehow not Christian? You lawyers can twist anything. You poor lawyers can twist anything poorly. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said:

So, providing poor brown kids shelter and protection from slavers is somehow not Christian? You lawyers can twist anything. You poor lawyers can twist anything poorly. 

 

He'll get back to you in a bit when he's done serving his time in the penalty box. 

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, SectionC3 said:

 

It’s not reworking the entire voting system.  “Vote by mail” and “vote absentee” are basically the same thing.  (In some places absentee might mean early in-person voting when the voter is to be out of town on Election Day.  New York State allows for early in-person voting, so “absentee” and “vote by mail” now are the same thing here.). It’s accounting for the time it will take to wait for the mail ballots to arrive, to open the ballots, and to run them through the “scantron.”  That’s it.  What we really need is patience to make this work smoothly.   

 

I am curious if you can tell me who won the 12th district of NY primaries that was suppose to be finished in June? Because if NYC can't reasonably count 40k in less than a month and a half, how do expect our country to count 40 million mail in votes? Or are you cool with the count going into March of next year? But it funny you use NY as your example of how to do things because NY is once again the prime example of how not to do things.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, BillStime said:

 

 

Democrats

Undermine the legitimacy of the election - before it starts -

Work overtime now to change systems in order to alter the results of fair elections

on all fronts including trying to underfund destroy law enforcement

-

Pure Liberalism (/Socialism/Communism....it's all about the same these days)

Edited by CarpetCrawler
  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...