Jump to content

2020 Election is officially Trump vs Biden


Recommended Posts

24 minutes ago, wAcKy ZeBrA said:

 

covfefe

 

 

Nah - you'll be called a racist if you B word about the color of her skin and you'll be called a misogynist if you B word about her being a woman.

You missed the part about being called a racist for not liking her policies and a misogynistic for pointing out how she was often a bad faith prosecutor. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Buffalo Timmy said:

You missed the part about being called a racist for not liking her policies and a misogynistic for pointing out how she was often a bad faith prosecutor. 

 

Quote where you or someone else was "called a racist for not liking her policies and a misogynistic for pointing out how she was often a bad faith prosecutor" instead of playing the victim.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, wAcKy ZeBrA said:

 

Quote where you or someone else was "called a racist for not liking her policies and a misogynistic for pointing out how she was often a bad faith prosecutor" instead of playing the victim.

 

Tulsi Gabbard says hello. 

 

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2019/07/31/gabbard_vs_harris_you_kept_prisoners_locked_up_for_labor_blocked_evidence_that_would_free_man_on_death_row.html

 

What happened to her campaign next? Right... Gary, wrong again! 

 

Keeping that track record of hilarious ignorance in tack throughout multiple screen names and accounts because he can't run fast or far enough from his own history around here. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

Tulsi Gabbard says hello. 

 

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2019/07/31/gabbard_vs_harris_you_kept_prisoners_locked_up_for_labor_blocked_evidence_that_would_free_man_on_death_row.html

 

What happened to her campaign next? Right... Gary, wrong again! 

 

Keeping that track record of hilarious ignorance in tack throughout multiple screen names and accounts because he can't run fast or far enough from his own history around here. 

 

Who called Tulsi a racist or misogynist?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Tiberius said:

Walk away? 

 

af1feb4c-2001-4fdc-93dd-798f91667c23.png&w=80&h=80
Opinion by 
Columnist
August 12, 2020 at 7:45 a.m. EDT
Add to list

Former Ohio Gov. John Kasich — a pro-life, fiscal-hawk Republican — will speak at the Democratic National Convention and has said he will vote for former vice president Joe Biden. In contrast to the equivocating Republican governor of Maryland, Larry Hogan (who has not ruled out voting for President Trump), Kasich makes as compelling a case as any politician that it is not enough to simply voice displeasure with Trump. We have to vote him out.

 

Kasich appeared with CNN’s Don Lemon on Monday to call for an end to the Trump era. “We can’t continue to go down this path. . . . I mean, people are now speaking to each other if they disagree with them with through clenched teeth. There’s almost hatred going on,” he explained. “This has to stop because the great things that happened in our country — whatever they are, women suffrage, civil rights — they happen when we come together, not when we’re divided.”

Kasich thinks Biden is the kind of unifier we need. More precisely, the former Ohio governor argues that, if one thinks Trump is a threat to the republic, it is not enough to stay home or write in a third party. “I’ve had enough of this. I’ve had enough of the division and everything else, and not getting anything done,” Kasich said. “So, to just sit it out again and say well I’m not going to be for Trump and not lend my support to somebody, I — it doesn’t make sense for me this time around.” You can either accept Trump as the new normal, or you can recognize he is a dangerous detour into unhinged populism and unfit for the job.

I can't say it's a terrible decision as Ohio could be in play and Kasich's only primary win was in Ohio.  However, his record of governor was one of union busting, decreasing education funding, and fighting against raising the state's minimum wage.  Everything the Democrats are supposed to oppose.  They're just trotting him out there because he doesn't like Trump.  Maybe just say thanks for the endorsement and not invite him to speak?

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, wAcKy ZeBrA said:

 

Quote where you or someone else was "called a racist for not liking her policies and a misogynistic for pointing out how she was often a bad faith prosecutor" instead of playing the victim.

I will tell you to watch Billstime in the near future but I was called a racist many times for objecting to Obama care and his Dreamer Act.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, wAcKy ZeBrA said:

 

covfefe

 

 

Nah - you'll be called a racist if you B word about the color of her skin and you'll be called a misogynist if you B word about her being a woman.

 

Don't forget a slut-shamer if you point out how she sucked Mayor Brown's willie to get into politics.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Doc Brown said:

I can't say it's a terrible decision as Ohio could be in play and Kasich's only primary win was in Ohio.  However, his record of governor was one of union busting, decreasing education funding, and fighting against raising the state's minimum wage.  Everything the Democrats are supposed to oppose.  They're just trotting him out there because he doesn't like Trump.  Maybe just say thanks for the endorsement and not invite him to speak?

 

The funniest thing to me is that Tibs thinks Jennifer Rubin promoting John Kasich has value to anyone who's not a mindless leftist. Neither of them will ever be considered 'conservative' by anyone other than the far left who pay them boatloads of cash to create that illusion.

 

In other words, when you're unable to think for yourself, it's easy to believe Rubin and Kasich are conservatives.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said:

"I am sure it will be played back, not necessarily by me... "   lol

 

 

 

 

This Tara Reade thing should blow up in Kamala's face, but she'll never be asked by anyone in the media, so it'll be up to Trump to keep bringing it up.

 

Interesting how Kamala suddenly DOESN'T believe all women now. How interesting that she would change her position again. Does she have a history of changing her position?

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, IDBillzFan said:

 

The funniest thing to me is that Tibs thinks Jennifer Rubin promoting John Kasich has value to anyone who's not a mindless leftist. Neither of them will ever be considered 'conservative' by anyone other than the far left who pay them boatloads of cash to create that illusion.

 

In other words, when you're unable to think for yourself, it's easy to believe Rubin and Kasich are conservatives.

I don't know enough about Rubin to comment but my main problem with Kasich is if he was really concerned about Trumpism driving this country farther apart he would've dropped out of the Republican primaries earlier instead of taking away votes from Cruz/Rubio.  Staying in until the last possible moment and now cashing in on just being an anti Trump moderate Republican is the opposite of courageous.

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

For years now, we’ve been told that the notion of some sort of cozy relationship between the Democrats and the media is just some right-wing conspiracy.

 

Well, about that:

 

 

 

“We did it, guys,” Biden’s deputy campaign manager tells the beat reporters who covers his campaign.

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

JOE BIDEN, A PROFILE IN PANDERING

 

This column by David Axelrod, Barack Obama’s chief strategist in 2008 and 2012, suggests that Joe Biden didn’t really want Kamala Harris to be his running mate. Axelrod doesn’t quite put it this way, but he does say that “others Biden considered may have fit more comfortably into partnership with him.”

 

This is similar to my take last week. I agreed that Harris was probably the frontrunner for the nomination, but added that if Biden made his decision based on his true preference, he would probably select someone else — perhaps Susan Rice.

 

Axelrod believes that Gretchen Whitmer, Michigan’s governor, was the number one “someone else.” Not only did Biden click well with Whitmer, she has governed a large state and (whatever we think of her) has a very high approval rating.

 

But, says Axelrod (though not in direct language), Whitmer was rejected because she is White. Axelrod adds that picking Whitmer would have upset leftists who wanted Elizabeth Warren on the ticket. By picking a Black, he made it difficult for Warren’s supporters to grumble.

 

(Biden was also comfortable with Susan Rice but she had no experience as a campaigner. In addition, the matter of Benghazi scared Biden away from Rice, according to Axelrod.)

 

So Biden’s pick for the person with roughly a 25 percent chance of becoming president without being elected was driven by considerations of gender, race, and maybe the lack of enough courage to upset Warren supporters.

 

The common denominator is the complete inability or unwillingness to stand up to the far left. But then, Biden has never really stood up to, or for, anyone or anything. He has no core beliefs. He always gone with the flow.

 

More at the link

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...