Jump to content

GDT: Nevada Caucuses


B-Man

Recommended Posts

17 minutes ago, Foxx said:

took me quite awhile to find the actual voter numbers from '16 (stupid delegate reporting only on most sites (wonder why that is)).

 

in '16 they had a turnout of 84k voters, so it appears that the numbers are on par with the last election caucus. again though, with the DNC/MSM fever of #orangemanbad, one would think that the turnout would be much higher. and if one were to compare these numbers to the turnout to elect Obama and shun the Bushista era, the numbers are way down, in the neighborhood of 30%. personally, i just don't see the MSM narrative of there being this massive voter sentiment to unseat Trump as ringing anywhere near being true. rather it is just their made up fantasy.

 

Nevada Democratic caucus turnout lower than in 2008

 

That article.is from 2016.  That's where the down 30% number is.  2008 is the record and what i have seen says they expect the numbers to be close to that.

 

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.vox.com/platform/amp/2020/2/23/21149443/nevada-caucuses-2020-turnout-record

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, section122 said:

 

That article.is from 2016.  That's where the down 30% number is.  2008 is the record and what i have seen says they expect the numbers to be close to that.

 

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.vox.com/platform/amp/2020/2/23/21149443/nevada-caucuses-2020-turnout-record

yes, exactly... the article is from 2016. which buttresses my contention that this years totals will be along the same lines of '16... down 30% from '08. however, we shall see what the final numbers are in the days ahead.

Edited by Foxx
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, section122 said:

This is exactly what so many here are doing about Bernie.  I honestly can't believe the pearl clutching throughout this forum about Bernie and how he will bring death to America.  People are comparing him getting elected to living is east germany during the cold war!

 

Quite literally no one is doing that here.

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said:


Neither does Trump...

 

Bernie isn’t hitler — no one seriously argues that. But he absolutely is a communist. 

 

Saying it is so does not make it so.

 

He's not, but this very argument to inevitability be used in the upcoming months--and already being used--is why Sanders remains my last choice as the nominee.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, transplantbillsfan said:

 

Saying it is so does not make it so.

 

He's not, but this very argument to inevitability be used in the upcoming months--and already being used--is why Sanders remains my last choice as the nominee.

 

Saying he's not, despite all facts and evidence (and plans/agendas/public statements) he's made to the contrary does not make it so. 

 

He's pushing the Green New Deal (that's communist)

He praised the USSR, Cuba and Venezula

He honeymooned in the USSR and praised their bread lines

 

Bernie is a communist. It's not even debatable unless you don't understand what communism is.

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Koko78 said:

 

Quite literally no one is doing that here.

 

 

See below...

 

15 hours ago, RochesterRob said:

  Voters under 40 are that way because the Cold War and what came before it barely gets a mention in school.  When it does get mentioned it is in the context of the failings of capitalism.  The worst part is the people that had to live behind the Iron Curtain at its most repressive time are no longer around to give first hand testimony.  I recall letters sent to a relative here in NY from her sister in E Germany when I was very young.  Three pages of text reduced to an opening, brief mention of the weather, and a closing.  Everything else was blackened out to the point of being not readable in the least.  The NY relative had lived in the aftermath of WWI in Central Europe and was well acquainted with the concept of not drawing attention to one's self.  I wish those letters were still around but I don't know whatever happened to them after the relative passed.

 

15 hours ago, Buffalo_Gal said:


I went to Czechoslovakia and Poland back when they were communist. There is nothing, absolutely nothing, good about living under communist rule. 
 

The dogs and machine guns patrolling the tracks and streets, the shortages of food, clothing, basic hygiene needs... simply horrible. Imagine a city like Krakow having one (old) car on the main road. A family of four, five assigned a “house” (apartment) with two rooms. If you had connections, you might also have a bathroom.

 

Anyone who feels there is anything redeeming about communism (or socialism) needs their head examined.

 

4 hours ago, KRC said:

 

Ditto what you said. I was in East Germany and East Berlin before the wall came down. Why anyone would purposely want to live under those conditions is mind boggling.

 

I missed the post comparing Sanders to Stalin.  The us will not become east germany or russia during the cold war if Bernie gets elected.  

 

We already have many socialist programs in place that benefit a great deal of people.  Pushing for expansion of or addition to doesn't make Bernie a communist.  

 

Going back to the mirroring Trump in 16.  Wasn't he a racist, bigot, xenophobe, etc?  Didn't people laugh then and laugh now about those claims?  Why the hyperbole?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, section122 said:

We already have many socialist programs in place that benefit a great deal of people.  Pushing for expansion of or addition to doesn't make Bernie a communist.  

 

The Green New Deal requires the state to take control of three of the biggest industries in the world (Transportation/travel, construction, and health care)...  That's not an expansion of social programs, it's a complete undoing of our economic model in favor of -- a communistic one. 

 

The GND is his central plank. 

 

He's pushing for communism in this country, he's just being dishonest about the labels. Like he's dishonest about his label as a democrat. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

Saying he's not, despite all facts and evidence (and plans/agendas/public statements) he's made to the contrary does not make it so. 

 

He's pushing the Green New Deal (that's communist)

He praised the USSR, Cuba and Venezula

He honeymooned in the USSR and praised their bread lines

 

Bernie is a communist. It's not even debatable unless you don't understand what communism is.

 

 

Ah yes the green new deal.  Invented and created by the famous Communist FDR. 

 

Complimenting Russia?  Has Trump not complimented them as well?

 

Honeymooned in Russia?  Trump Tower Moscow?

 

 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Acknowledging that isn't fearmongering. It's honesty.

Just now, section122 said:

 

Ah yes the green new deal.  Invented and created by the famous Communist FDR. 

 

Complimenting Russia?  Has Trump not complimented them as well?

 

Honeymooned in Russia?  Trump Tower Moscow?

 

 

 

Honeymooned in the USSR at the peak of the cold war. 

 

Difference, 122 ;) 

(Russia is not the USSR)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, section122 said:

 

 

See below...

 

 

 

 

I missed the post comparing Sanders to Stalin.  The us will not become east germany or russia during the cold war if Bernie gets elected.  

 

We already have many socialist programs in place that benefit a great deal of people.  Pushing for expansion of or addition to doesn't make Bernie a communist.  

 

Going back to the mirroring Trump in 16.  Wasn't he a racist, bigot, xenophobe, etc?  Didn't people laugh then and laugh now about those claims?  Why the hyperbole?


That is pearl clutching? That is some extrapolation. 
 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, RochesterRob said:

  Once in a while an indication of the conditions got by the censors.  One time something was written about not being able to keep weight on.  Had the two individuals never known each other personally the statement about weight would only be taken as an observation about the person.  But having grown up together as sisters the US relative knew it would be very uncharacteristic of the other to comment about her weight without it meaning more.  

 

A good book on the subject is Nina Wilmer's "Forty Autumns: A Family's Story of Courage and Survival on Both Sides of the Berlin Wall."

It chronicles a forty year history of their family, one of which escaped to the West. It talks about the fear they all had of the Stazi - who were worse than the Russian's KGB. 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said:


First you were certain Biden would be the one to end Trump — then he cratered like I promised he would. 
 

Then it was Mayor Pete and Warren you swore would be the end of Trump — then they both cratered as I promised they would. 
 

Now it’s Sanders and the 18-26 year old demo who are going to turn out (in numbers they’ve never ever turned out before) who will end Trump — but, like your other false hopes, this will be dashed too. 
 

Might want to get used to your new avatar my friend. You’re in for a loooong 5 years. 

 

 

...he's as a viable contributor here as he is on the football side as he was on BBMB......YAWN..........Fisher Price wi fi strikes again.....

Edited by OldTimeAFLGuy
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Tiberius said:

So are autocracies, go live in Russia 

 

Sanders can't turn us into a communist nation, but Trump is sure smashing up the republic, 

 

The Russian autocracy it the product of failed communism. 

Can you explain in what manner Trump is smashing up the republic?

It’s hysterical statements and beliefs like this (ALWAYS coming from people like you who simply hate the person) that would lead you to try convincing yourself that electing Bernie Sanders is even remotely a good idea.  Get a grip on your derangement for ten seconds and you’ll realize that.  

 

Just two days ago you were anti-Sanders, and you know why.  He’s a class- pandering commie and bad for our country in insidious ways that you seem to want to ignore.  If it isn’t Bernie who’s going to make us full-blown socialist/communists, then it will be whomever follows him — and you know that, too.

 

Get over yourself and your hatred of Trump and go nominate a Democrat who’s ACTUALLY A DEMOCRAT.

This goes for @transplantbillsfan, too.  Young voters like Bernie because he’s authentic.. Big deal.  Being an authentic communist isn’t any good reason to vote for him. Getting promised free things without being told that you’d still need to work is dishonest. Promising Medicare for all while dodging almost every single question as to how he’d pay for it is dishonest.  Once Bernie has to explain these things, it won’t go well for his prospects of winning. Trump has a very good chance at losing this election, but I don’t think he’s going to lose to Bernie. You and your fellow Democrat (or anti-Trump) voters should really get your act together. 

 

And @Doc Brown — checks and balances aren’t the point here with Sanders.  The point is that electing him results in the actual legitimization of the notion that whatever social safety programs we already have in place should be expanded.  I know I’m going all slippery slope here, but look into the future.  Look into what a wealth tax would encompass and how easily it could be expanded; and how easily it will divide people by class; and how easily it will be adopted at State tax levels.  I don’t have the means to be worried about the wealth tax today, and I probably won’t ever need to.  But the thresholds can always be adjusted in ways you and I wouldn’t expect to be acceptable today. Look at countries that had wealth taxes and abandoned them and why.  Why should we even be talking about it when it’s been shown to be an unwieldy failure? It’s a power grab from individuals and State and local governments.  

 

 

 

Edited by snafu
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, section122 said:

He isn't going to bring communism to America.  If you believe in America then you believe in the system of checks and balances that has worked for over 200 years.  If you think a guy can come in and destroy the country in 4 years you sound like the dems in 2016.  Even that would only apply if he was this evil red caricature you have all lapped up from the media.  

 

Again, I know I’m slippery-sloping, but consider that health insurance was governed by states until ACA came around and started us down the road toward a Federally administered program.  Sounded innocent at the time, yeah? Now it’s almost a given that states are being taken out of the equation.  Bernie’s Medicare for all is the next step in the progression.  Wealth tax is the next step in the progression.  Federally run free education (probably with Federally approved curricula) is the next step in the progression.  You’re right, Bernie isn’t taking us to communism in 4 years. That’s not his goal or purpose.  He wants our country to be communist some day — whether he’s on this Earth to witness it really doesn’t seem to matter to him.

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Buffalo_Gal said:


I went to Czechoslovakia and Poland back when they were communist. There is nothing, absolutely nothing, good about living under communist rule. 
 

The dogs and machine guns patrolling the tracks and streets, the shortages of food, clothing, basic hygiene needs... simply horrible. Imagine a city like Krakow having one (old) car on the main road. A family of four, five assigned a “house” (apartment) with two rooms. If you had connections, you might also have a bathroom.

 

Anyone who feels there is anything redeeming about communism (or socialism) needs their head examined.

 

5 hours ago, RochesterRob said:

  Once in a while an indication of the conditions got by the censors.  One time something was written about not being able to keep weight on.  Had the two individuals never known each other personally the statement about weight would only be taken as an observation about the person.  But having grown up together as sisters the US relative knew it would be very uncharacteristic of the other to comment about her weight without it meaning more.  

 

5 hours ago, RochesterRob said:

  Which has nothing to do with what I am talking about.  A communist nation can generate economic output and still be a crappy place to live.  If you believe in communism then go find a communist country to live in.

 

4 hours ago, KRC said:

 

Ditto what you said. I was in East Germany and East Berlin before the wall came down. Why anyone would purposely want to live under those conditions is mind boggling.

 

It's truly sad that your belief is that electing Bernie will lead us down the path of having dogs and machine guns patrolling the streets, food shortages (this is likely coming anyway, not because of Communism), basic hygiene needs (though already here in so many ways), not having private property anymore, Dictators (though we have a guy trying to get there in the White House right now), Censors (Though we have a guy trying his damndest to find ways to implement these right now), etc.

 

Bernie as President does not make us East Germany, Poland, Czechoslovakia or Venezuela.

 

He's a Democratic Socialist, NOT a communist... they simply aren't the same, ESPECIALLY when put into practice.

 

If you're desperate for comparison then at least use more apt comparisons like Finland, Sweden or Denmark rather than East Germany, Poland and Czechoslovakia.

 

And those better comparisons are consistently some of the happiest countries on the planet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, transplantbillsfan said:

 

 

 

 

 

He's a Democratic Socialist, NOT a communist... they simply aren't the same, ESPECIALLY when put into practice.

 

If you're desperate for comparison then at least use more apt comparisons like Finland, Sweden or Denmark rather than East Germany, Poland and Czechoslovakia.

 

And those better comparisons are consistently some of the happiest countries on the planet.


And those countries are not socialist — they’re free market capitalistic countries. 
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, transplantbillsfan said:

 

 

 

 

It's truly sad that your belief is that electing Bernie will lead us down the path of having dogs and machine guns patrolling the streets, food shortages (this is likely coming anyway, not because of Communism), basic hygiene needs (though already here in so many ways), not having private property anymore, Dictators (though we have a guy trying to get there in the White House right now), Censors (Though we have a guy trying his damndest to find ways to implement these right now), etc.

 

Bernie as President does not make us East Germany, Poland, Czechoslovakia or Venezuela.

 

He's a Democratic Socialist, NOT a communist... they simply aren't the same, ESPECIALLY when put into practice.

 

If you're desperate for comparison then at least use more apt comparisons like Finland, Sweden or Denmark rather than East Germany, Poland and Czechoslovakia.

 

And those better comparisons are consistently some of the happiest countries on the planet.


Communism, which you are cheering for, is ugly, inhumane, soul crushing, and horrifying. Bernie is a ***** communist, and anyone trying to pretty it up is lying to themselves, and others.

 

The only thing “sad” is the stupidity of some Americans voting for this commie hustler.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Buffalo_Gal said:


Communism, which you are cheering for, is ugly, inhumane, soul crushing, and horrifying. Bernie is a ***** communist, and anyone trying to pretty it up is lying to themselves, and others.

 

The only thing “sad” is the stupidity of some Americans voting for this commie hustler.


It’s the old saying: “those who do not know history are doomed to repeat it.” 
 

Our education system failed the younger generations (including my own) by not being honest about this very thing. 
 

:beer: 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, snafu said:

And @Doc Brown — checks and balances aren’t the point here with Sanders.  The point is that electing him results in the actual legitimization of the notion that whatever social safety programs we already have in place should be expanded.  I know I’m going all slippery slope here, but look into the future.  Look into what a wealth tax would encompass and how easily it could be expanded; and how easily it will divide people by class; and how easily it will be adopted at State tax levels.  I don’t have the means to be worried about the wealth tax today, and I probably won’t ever need to.  But the thresholds can always be adjusted in ways you and I wouldn’t expect to be acceptable today. Look at countries that had wealth taxes and abandoned them and why.  Why should be even be talking about it when it’s been shown to be an unwieldy failure? It’s a power grab from individuals and State and local governments.  

As a Democrat I agree with that which is why even establishment Democrats will vote for Bernie even if they think some of his proposals like a Green New Deal are insane.  A $15 federal minimum wage will increase the wages of 33 million people by 2025 according to an epi study.  I know you'll point to all the drawbacks of raising the federal minimum wage but that's going to be the Dems sales pitch going into 2020.  I agree that a wealth tax isn't a good idea and I doubt it'll ever get through Congress even if the Dems hold all three houses (which would only happen if a recession hit). 

 

For the record, I don't think Bernie would win but if he did then the Republican resistance would make the Tea Party look like amateur hour.  We'll be fine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, snafu said:

 

Again, I know I’m slippery-sloping, but consider that health insurance was governed by states until ACA came around and started us down the road toward a Federally administered program.  Sounded innocent at the time, yeah? Now it’s almost a given that states are being taken out of the equation.  Bernie’s Medicare for all is the next step in the progression.  Wealth tax is the next step in the progression.  Federally run free education (probably with Federally approved curricula) is the next step in the progression.  You’re right, Bernie isn’t taking us to communism in 4 years. That’s not his goal or purpose.  He wants our country to be communist some day — whether he’s on this Earth to witness it really doesn’t seem to matter to him.

 

 

...professing my ignorance, with a sincere apology, what government run program has ever proven to be far more proficient or efficient versus the private sector?......the private sector raises rates and runs the risk of pricing itself out of the market......the government raises rates and what is the resistance?...NONE.....need more, you send us more....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Foxx said:

it appears you are correct and i was prettys sure that those weren't the actual vote(r) totals.

 

however, i *think i might have found actual voter totals and to be honest, they are still somewhat underwhelming, again, if these numbers are the actual voter turnout. less then 60k with 60% reporting which would mean less than 100k in toto when all accounted for.

 

Nevada Caucuses 2020: Live Results

nevada.thumb.png.6d4318f61e04e7c3a9d1496cb89754ff.png

 

Before the caucuses began there were something like 70,000 early votes.

 

That was already fairly close to 2016 numbers.

 

I wanna say 2008 was something like 117,000 total.

 

I don't know when the final numbers will be posted, but it's pretty safe to assume the early votes combined with yesterday will pretty easily beat yesterday's turnout and will at least rival, if not beat 2008.

 

4 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said:


First you were certain Biden would be the one to end Trump — then he cratered like I promised he would. 
 

Then it was Mayor Pete and Warren you swore would be the end of Trump — then they both cratered as I promised they would. 
 

Now it’s Sanders and the 18-26 year old demo who are going to turn out (in numbers they’ve never ever turned out before) who will end Trump — but, like your other false hopes, this will be dashed too. 
 

Might want to get used to your new avatar my friend. You’re in for a loooong 5 years. 

 

You really do have no qualms whatsoever twisting narratives...

 

You should run for office! :thumbsup:

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, transplantbillsfan said:

You really do have no qualms whatsoever twisting narratives...

 

You should run for office! :thumbsup:

 

It's not twisted. Your own posts and words are all there to be read. 

 

You started convinced Biden would mop the floor with Trump -- but you were wrong. 

Then you moved to Mayor Pete and Warren -- and were wrong again. 

Now you're banking on a demo turning out in numbers they've never turned out before to beat Trump -- and you will be wrong again. 

 

No one running can beat Trump. I've been consistent in that from day one while you've jumped from horse to horse. 

 

That's not twisting anything, it's just an accurate recap of your delusion ;) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Buffalo_Gal said:


As others have pointed out to you, Bernie is most certainly a communist. Mao, Stalin, Marx, some people you may want to read up on since Bernie wants to reset America. ?

 

I'm disappointed in you.

 

Rather than using this as an opportunity to somehow enlighten me on the parallels Bernie would have with Stalin or Mao, you instead post this crap.

 

Maybe you should read up yourself.

 

Marx shouldn't be lumped in with Mao or Stalin. Marxism was a vision. Stalin, Mao and others wildly distorted that vision and used its name for their own corrupt purposes of maintaining power.

 

Obviously as all of you spew "he's a communist!" with regard to Bernie, you're referring to previous and current regimes that are nearly universally mislabeled as "Communist regimes" rather than actual Marxism.

 

The thing is, while there might be an ideological alignment with true Marxism (which actually isn't evil the way some of you portray it), if you actually read up on what Sanders plans, there are many big differences.

 

That's why he's not a communist. He's a Democratic Socialist.

5 hours ago, Foxx said:

is this right?  50% of precincts reporting and the totals are under 8,000 votes?

if that is true, then Democrats turnout has to be a large red flag for the establishment, as well as being quite laughable.

 

2020 Nevada caucus election results

nevada.thumb.png.3af5e2d6df2eaeb72477cb0925fc91fd.png

 

4 hours ago, Foxx said:

it appears you are correct and i was prettys sure that those weren't the actual vote(r) totals.

 

however, i *think i might have found actual voter totals and to be honest, they are still somewhat underwhelming, again, if these numbers are the actual voter turnout. less then 60k with 60% reporting which would mean less than 100k in toto when all accounted for.

 

Nevada Caucuses 2020: Live Results

nevada.thumb.png.6d4318f61e04e7c3a9d1496cb89754ff.png

 

3 hours ago, Foxx said:

took me quite awhile to find the actual voter numbers from '16 (stupid delegate reporting only on most sites (wonder why that is)).

 

in '16 they had a turnout of 84k voters, so it appears that the numbers are on par with the last election caucus. again though, with the DNC/MSM fever of #orangemanbad, one would think that the turnout would be much higher. and if one were to compare these numbers to the turnout to elect Obama and shun the Bushista era, the numbers are way down, in the neighborhood of 30%. personally, i just don't see the MSM narrative of there being this massive voter sentiment to unseat Trump as ringing anywhere near being true. rather it is just their made up fantasy.

 

Nevada Democratic caucus turnout lower than in 2008

 

Love ya Foxxy... but you crack me up.

 

Just read these 3 posts in sequence 

giphy.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, transplantbillsfan said:

Marx shouldn't be lumped in with Mao or Stalin. Marxism was a vision.

 

No. No it was not. 

 

It was poison. Any educated person who thinks Marxism was simply a vision is deeply ignorant. 

4 minutes ago, transplantbillsfan said:

Obviously as all of you spew "he's a communist!" with regard to Bernie, you're referring to previous and current regimes that are nearly universally mislabeled as "Communist regimes" rather than actual Marxism.

 

The thing is, while there might be an ideological alignment with true Marxism (which actually isn't evil the way some of you portray it), if you actually read up on what Sanders plans, there are many big differences.

 

Marxism is evil. It requires an adversary to work, which means there will always be an oppressor and oppressed. There's no room for anything but. 

 

Your brain has been poisoned and you don't even realize it. 

 

(Again, proving what I said about the failure of our education system the past several generations -- we allowed Marxists to infiltrate it and spread their disease).

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Deranged Rhino said:


And those countries are not socialist — they’re free market capitalistic countries. 
 

 

  And for many decades they were pretty much getting a free ride in terms of defense expenditures.  If the US had somebody else footing the defense bill we could spend all kinds of money on social programs if we so chose.  Not saying that we should but just saying it would be possible.

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Buffalo_Gal said:

Communism, which you are cheering for, is ugly, inhumane, soul crushing, and horrifying. Bernie is a ***** communist, and anyone trying to pretty it up is lying to themselves, and others.

 

The only thing “sad” is the stupidity of some Americans voting for this commie hustler.

giphy.gif

22 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

It's not twisted. Your own posts and words are all there to be read. 

 

You started convinced Biden would mop the floor with Trump -- but you were wrong. 

Then you moved to Mayor Pete and Warren -- and were wrong again. 

Now you're banking on a demo turning out in numbers they've never turned out before to beat Trump -- and you will be wrong again. 

 

No one running can beat Trump. I've been consistent in that from day one while you've jumped from horse to horse. 

 

That's not twisting anything, it's just an accurate recap of your delusion ;) 

 

It is twisting.

 

And again, run for office. You seem like you'd be good at it. :beer:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, transplantbillsfan said:

 

... Love ya Foxxy... but you crack me up.

 

Just read these 3 posts in sequence 

giphy.gif

you'll have to explain just how exactly is it moving the goal posts? 

 

i owned the delegate numbers and subsequently posted the actual voter numbers that backed up what i initially said. then i dug up numbers for '16 which also included numbers for '08 and went on to bolster my argument with emphasis. so, again, please explain how that is moving the goalposts. not lost here is the fact that you omitted the last post of mine in this series that essentially stated that we would have to wait and see what the final numbers were.

 

additionally, i saw your prior post where you say that you saw where some 70k early votes cast and that the final tally may rival the '08 numbers (117k). i saw that number as well but that was from a vox article, so i tend to take those numbers with a grain of salt. my numbers are being reported pretty consistently across many sites and as such, the extrapolation just does not add up to what you want to believe in the vox numbers. it may ultimately prove that they do but at current with the numbers we do have being actually reported, the numbers are not in your favor.

 

lastly, i did notice that you avoided my question about Sander's policies versus Trump's policies. i will assume that you can not answer it and that is okay because there is no logical defense.

Edited by Foxx
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, transplantbillsfan said:

 

I'm disappointed in you.

 

Rather than using this as an opportunity to somehow enlighten me on the parallels Bernie would have with Stalin or Mao, you instead post this crap.

 

Maybe you should read up yourself.

 

Marx shouldn't be lumped in with Mao or Stalin. Marxism was a vision. Stalin, Mao and others wildly distorted that vision and used its name for their own corrupt purposes of maintaining power.

 

Obviously as all of you spew "he's a communist!" with regard to Bernie, you're referring to previous and current regimes that are nearly universally mislabeled as "Communist regimes" rather than actual Marxism.

 

The thing is, while there might be an ideological alignment with true Marxism (which actually isn't evil the way some of you portray it), if you actually read up on what Sanders plans, there are many big differences.

 

That's why he's not a communist. He's a Democratic Socialist.

 

 

 

Love ya Foxxy... but you crack me up.

 

Just read these 3 posts in sequence 

giphy.gif

  You and Marx failed to reach one utmost conclusion about the nature of man and politics.  Man is inevitably corruptible and the more autocratic the political system the lesser the chance is of overriding it into a more benign state.  

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Buffalo_Gal said:


Communism, which you are cheering for, is ugly, inhumane, soul crushing, and horrifying. Bernie is a ***** communist, and anyone trying to pretty it up is lying to themselves, and others.

 

The only thing “sad” is the stupidity of some Americans voting for this commie hustler.

 

Communism is a political system completely different from our Congress. Socialism is a economic system which we have part of but mainly capitalism .

 

I would never vote for Bernie he is a idealist who's green new deal is not possible and whose followers do not understand.

Edited by ALF
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Doc Brown said:

For the record, I don't think Bernie would win but if he did then the Republican resistance would make the Tea Party look like amateur hour.  We'll be fine.

 

If Bernie wins, I’m gonna have to go on eBay and snap up a bunch of #resist t-shirts and bumper stickers!

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, transplantbillsfan said:

It is twisting.

 

Are you saying you did not say Biden would easily beat Trump? 

Or that, once Biden imploded, Mayor Pete was your horse? Followed by Warren? 

Are you not now saying, despite all the candidates being shown to have no ability to carry the vote that they will still beat Trump because a demo that never turns out magically will this time around? 

 

One of us is twisting. It ain't me ;) 

 

There are going to be so many new avatars to pick from for you come November. Maybe it'll be this one. Or maybe we'll do a new one every month for a year? 

Image result for trump is great

23 minutes ago, ALF said:

Communism is a political system completely different from our Congress. Socialism is a economic system which we have part of but mainly capitalism .

 

Socialism is a stepping stone to Communism. That's the goal of socialism in all it's forms. That's not me saying this, that's Lenin.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, transplantbillsfan said:

 

Marx shouldn't be lumped in with Mao or Stalin. Marxism was a vision. Stalin, Mao and others wildly distorted that vision and used its name for their own corrupt purposes of maintaining power.

 

Obviously as all of you spew "he's a communist!" with regard to Bernie, you're referring to previous and current regimes that are nearly universally mislabeled as "Communist regimes" rather than actual Marxism.

 

 

This encapsulates what they've done to you, @transplantbillsfan

 

Image

 

Marx wasn't a visionary, a hero, or a good person. His "vision" has a body count in the 100s of millions. 

  • Thank you (+1) 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, transplantbillsfan said:

He's a Democratic Socialist, NOT a communist... they simply aren't the same, ESPECIALLY when put into practice.

 

Feel free to explain the differences between Democratic Socialism and regular old Socialism.

 

Putting the term "Democratic" in front of it doesn't make any more difference than calling Herpes "Democratic Herpes".

Edited by Koko78
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...