Jump to content

The Impeachment Trial of President Donald J. Trump


Nanker

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, keepthefaith said:

 

Joe didn't just get his kid a job.   He exerted his will and the will of our country on another nation for the benefit of his son and his son's employer.  That's breaking the law. 

 

He exerted the will of our country at the direction of the official policy of the United States, European allies, and the International Monetary Fund, though. That it also benefited his son doesn't make it illegal.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Bob in Mich said:

 

Simple question:  If Trump acted exactly as accused and for the exact motivations proposed by the House Dems, are those actions OK with you and is it OK for all politicians now going forward?

There has been no proof of anything, just how you and others "feel". Under our justice system the speculation by the dems would not have even made it to a grand jury. Don't expect paragraph after paragraph of response by me to your horseshit speculation and hidden rabbit holes. 

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Bob in Mich said:

Perhaps you should wake up.

 

Says the guy who still thinks Trump/Russia is real, doesn't know who the IC IG is and why he matters, yet wades in on his high horse proclaiming that everyone else is ignorant of reality or playing partisan politics. Foxx doesn't need to wake up... but someone does ;) 

 

I write comedy... but I can't write this kind of comedy :lol: 

  • Haha (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, snafu said:

 

I know you didn't direct this at me, but here's a snarky answer:

Don't worry, Trump is a one hit wonder. No other politician would ever do this.

Bob is quickly approaching @Tiberius territory. he is talking people in circles because he can't/won't do any work of his own. and as we all know with demented liberals, there is not a thing in this universe we could point them to that would change their mind. they have to stub their own toe and come to the realization that it hurts them before they are even going to begin to broach the  matter of having any understanding of reality of any kind.

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said:

Your use of interregnum is wrong, but your reference to "money wrench" probably has some validity as it pertains to Nancy Politics. 

Oh no, I used the word correctly, but you will never be able to figure that out. 

 

And, again, good job Nancy! 

 

Image result for nancy pelosi clap
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Deranged Rhino said:

 

Says the guy who still thinks Trump/Russia is real, doesn't know who the IC IG is and why he matters, yet wades in on his high horse proclaiming that everyone else is ignorant of reality or playing partisan politics. Foxx doesn't need to wake up... but someone does ;) 

 

I write comedy... but I can't write this kind of comedy :lol: 

 

You should be getting a lot of good ideas reading around here!

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Foxx said:

Bob is quickly approaching @Tiberius territory. he is talking people in circles because he can't/won't do any work of his own. and as we all know with demented liberals, there is not a thing in this universe we could point them to that would change their mind. they have to stub their own toe and come to the realization that it hurts them before they are even going to begin to broach the  matter of having any understanding of reality of any kind.

Oh boy, Here goes Foxxy talking in wild generalities again! ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

 

 

Oh ya, and Trump and Russia in a conspiracy is absolutely a real thing. The liars can deny all they want. I mean he holds secret meetings the bloody Putin. This is an American president? 

  Liquid lunch today?  Money wrenches?  meetings the bloody?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

How false narratives spread:

 

The poll question was “should witnesses *be allowed* to testify”

 

but it’s been twisted and spread so most people think the poll actually said “75% want new witnesses called” which was not the question.

 

 

The Senate has heard from 17 witnesses.....via the House testimony

 

EPcwRYZXUAEU1e9?format=jpg&name=360x360EPcwRYNXkAAOmuu?format=jpg&name=360x360

 

EPcwRYJW4AIEvWY?format=jpg&name=360x360EPcwRYIWsAEOCt_?format=jpg&name=360x360

Edited by B-Man
  • Like (+1) 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, GG said:

 

Because it's not how decisions for selecting corporate boards go.   Each member is selected based on their potential contribution to the company.  In Biden's case, given his zero experience in energy, his selection was based purely on potential political influence.   

 

The appointment in itself is rife with conflicts of interests, but when you add daddy bragging about firing a prosecutor who was looking into the business dealings of a company where his son is a director, that should set off so many alarms for breaking every ethical code that exists in advanced economies, not to mention standing laws on corrupt dealings by public and private officials.

 

If Biden fired the guy that was investigating his son, which I dispute at this time, but if so and that firing aligned with our country's national policy, then it is not as shady as implied.  Did it look bad?  Yup.  How did it differ from Trump's quid pro quo?  The request of Trump was not aligned with national policy and appears to be simply about smearing Biden, his political opponent.

 

As the WH lawyers pointed out, there were many news stories about this and how bad it looked.  Did these stories build over time to eventually show all the shady dealings you guys are implying?  It seems if a reporter had their teeth into this story they would not just drop it.  Did they all drop the stories or is there now a mountain of evidence that Foxx is sitting on?

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Gary Busey said:

 

He exerted the will of our country at the direction of the official policy of the United States, European allies, and the International Monetary Fund, though. That it also benefited his son doesn't make it illegal.

Who sets the official foreign policy of the United States?

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Foxx said:

prove i'm wrong. have you stubbed your toe? did it hurt?

DEAR ABBY: After a long relationship, "Eric" and I plan on getting married very soon. My problem is, Eric is secretive. He keeps his phone right next to him, and before he walks into the house, he sits in his car, clearing his history. I know he looks at porn, and I'm not happy about it, but it's the other things I'm angry and confused about.

He secretly has social media. I know he's been sending pictures of himself to women, and they send pictures to him. Isn't that cheating? I think secret phone and video calls to women is cheating. I saw an image of a woman's private parts on his phone, and he told me lies about it. When I have confronted him about chatting with the other women, he gets angry and withdraws. One woman even sent me their chat history, and he lied about that, too.

Abby, I love my man, but I feel he's cheating. I don't know what else to do as there's a wedding soon. -- DESPERATE FOR ANSWERS

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Bob in Mich said:

 

If Biden fired the guy that was investigating his son, which I dispute at this time, but if so and that firing aligned with our country's national policy, then it is not as shady as implied.  Did it look bad?  Yup.  How did it differ from Trump's quid pro quo?  The request of Trump was not aligned with national policy and appears to be simply about smearing Biden, his political opponent.

 

As the WH lawyers pointed out, there were many news stories about this and how bad it looked.  Did these stories build over time to eventually show all the shady dealings you guys are implying?  It seems if a reporter had their teeth into this story they would not just drop it.  Did they all drop the stories or is there now a mountain of evidence that Foxx is sitting on?

Bob, bob bob bob.....

 

Trump sets national policy you unmitigated idiot.

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Tiberius said:

DEAR ABBY: After a long relationship, "Eric" and I plan on getting married very soon. My problem is, Eric is secretive. He keeps his phone right next to him, and before he walks into the house, he sits in his car, clearing his history. I know he looks at porn, and I'm not happy about it, but it's the other things I'm angry and confused about.

He secretly has social media. I know he's been sending pictures of himself to women, and they send pictures to him. Isn't that cheating? I think secret phone and video calls to women is cheating. I saw an image of a woman's private parts on his phone, and he told me lies about it. When I have confronted him about chatting with the other women, he gets angry and withdraws. One woman even sent me their chat history, and he lied about that, too.

Abby, I love my man, but I feel he's cheating. I don't know what else to do as there's a wedding soon. -- DESPERATE FOR ANSWERS

you're telling us that you sext and your mom's upset about it?

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...