plenzmd1 Posted July 24, 2019 Share Posted July 24, 2019 4 3 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted July 24, 2019 Share Posted July 24, 2019 Just now, 3rdnlng said: The illegality here was not accepting dirt or hiring someone to dig up dirt. It was misrepresenting the dug up dirt as being vetted and using it as the basis to get a warrant and using law enforcement against an opposing campaign. (and paying for foreign intelligence services to provide said dirt -- which is illegal for the purposes of subverting a sitting president) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whatdrought Posted July 24, 2019 Share Posted July 24, 2019 (edited) 2 minutes ago, plenzmd1 said: This might be the best takeaway. The Republicans should probably let Quigly use all their time... Edited July 24, 2019 by whatdrought Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keepthefaith Posted July 24, 2019 Share Posted July 24, 2019 56 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Schiff is such a ****head. If I were Schiff, I'd beef up my security detail. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted July 24, 2019 Share Posted July 24, 2019 3 minutes ago, keepthefaith said: If I were Schiff, I'd beef up my security detail. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted July 24, 2019 Share Posted July 24, 2019 12 minutes ago, jrober38 said: Then why haven't they been charged? Trump said it himself - people pay for political dirt all the time, which is true. For whatever reason, if you seek out the dirt, it's legal , but if a foreign government brings you something on their own, it's illegal. Clinton hasn't been charged, so she's not guilty. Trump hasn't been charged, so...? 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whatdrought Posted July 24, 2019 Share Posted July 24, 2019 3 minutes ago, DC Tom said: Clinton hasn't been charged, so she's not guilty. Trump hasn't been charged, so...? Woah Woah woah... Don't question assumptions now... Obviously we can assume that if Clinton were guilty she'd be charge, but that Trump hasn't been charged because he's obstructing justice... I mean, that's just simple assumptions, which we know are true. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LB3 Posted July 24, 2019 Share Posted July 24, 2019 (edited) I got out of a meeting in time to catch the last 15 minutes before the current break. It's getting tough to listen to Mueller struggle. Edited July 24, 2019 by LBSeeBallLBGetBall 1 1 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted July 24, 2019 Share Posted July 24, 2019 3 hours ago, LBSeeBallLBGetBall said: Agreed. Time to get them. "Hillary, your lies make me hard". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bray Wyatt Posted July 24, 2019 Share Posted July 24, 2019 1 minute ago, LBSeeBallLBGetBall said: I got out of meeting in time to catch the last 15 minutes before the current break. It's getting tough to listen to Mueller struggle. 2 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jrober38 Posted July 24, 2019 Share Posted July 24, 2019 20 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: You're 100% wrong on where the dirt came from, how it was obtained, why it obtained in that matter and how it fits the exact definition of collusion/conspiracy the left has been trying to sink Trump with for three years. Feel free to enlighten me then. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LB3 Posted July 24, 2019 Share Posted July 24, 2019 Just now, 3rdnlng said: "Hillary, your lies make me hard". "Barack, I'm not a tranny." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jrober38 Posted July 24, 2019 Share Posted July 24, 2019 (edited) 9 minutes ago, DC Tom said: Clinton hasn't been charged, so she's not guilty. Trump hasn't been charged, so...? Trump can't be charged while he's President unless Congress impeaches him. Impeachment is very unpopular in the polls, which is why I think they'll wait until he's no longer President to go after him (I don't agree with this at all, just what I think they'll do). Edited July 24, 2019 by jrober38 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted July 24, 2019 Share Posted July 24, 2019 2 minutes ago, jrober38 said: Feel free to enlighten me then. I'm not trying to be snippy -- just a lot happening all at once. When this dies down I will -- but start by reading that document I shared which you said you already knew about but didn't. https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/icotr/51117/2016_Cert_FISC_Memo_Opin_Order_Apr_2017.pdf Page 82-85 specifically. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whatdrought Posted July 24, 2019 Share Posted July 24, 2019 I'm sure this was discussed earlier, but DAMN SON! Where Do I have to move to vote for this guy? 1 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted July 24, 2019 Share Posted July 24, 2019 2 minutes ago, jrober38 said: Trump can't be charged. Quit your horseshit. I haven't been responding to you because you are "one of those posters". You subtly twist things and draw people into a long discussion with statements like the above. We know Trump can't be charged as a sitting president. If Mueller thought he was guilty of something there was nothing against him coming right out and saying so. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted July 24, 2019 Author Share Posted July 24, 2019 Republicans are not questioning any of Muellers basic conclusions. They are just trying to raise red Harings Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted July 24, 2019 Share Posted July 24, 2019 Stefanik was the one who tripped up Comey in 2017 and started the whole unraveling FYI. She got him to throw Bill Preistap under the congressional bus. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whatdrought Posted July 24, 2019 Share Posted July 24, 2019 (edited) 1 minute ago, Tiberius said: Republicans are not questioning any of Muellers basic conclusions. They are just trying to raise red Harings How so? What conclussions do you want them to ask about, and what red harings are they throwing? Edited July 24, 2019 by whatdrought Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted July 24, 2019 Share Posted July 24, 2019 (This setting exposes Nunes' lack of a legal background) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts