Deranged Rhino Posted July 24, 2019 Share Posted July 24, 2019 When you lose ABC... you've lost. (but he won't) 2 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted July 24, 2019 Share Posted July 24, 2019 Mueller’s responses to the GOP questions remind me of “Uncle Leo” on Seinfeld, when Jerry caught him shoplifting... “I’m an Old Man! I Get Confused!!!! I thought I paid for this...” ? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted July 24, 2019 Share Posted July 24, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted July 24, 2019 Share Posted July 24, 2019 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
US Egg Posted July 24, 2019 Share Posted July 24, 2019 Mueller's bumbling made President Ford's bumbling sound like Shakespeare. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snafu Posted July 24, 2019 Share Posted July 24, 2019 1 hour ago, SoCal Deek said: The government sets you up for a sham charge of a crime that the same government later admits you didn’t do and then comes down on you for trying to stop the sham that they set up. Nice! I'm sorry, that's just too direct and to the point . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
plenzmd1 Posted July 24, 2019 Share Posted July 24, 2019 32 minutes ago, whatdrought said: Okay, I was working and only got bits and pieces of this. Can someone from each side of the argument post what they feel is the best report/summarization? @Tiberius if you have one I will read it without flaming it- just wanting both sides. Tell my 10,000 foot version 1) It sounded right from the get go Mueller did not know the report inside and out , he did not lead the day to day. he did sound old and not quite up to the task at times 2) Both sides hammered home their talking points .. no news there. Obstruction for the Dems..bias and how the investigation got started for GOP 3) Republicans made some good points about why certain people were not charged 4) Democrats made salient points that some of the "obstructive acts" ( seems like they were focusing on 5) would constitute criminal bbehavior and met the 3 criteria( i forgot what the criteria are) to charge if Trump was a private citizen and not the POTUS In the end, nothing and nobody will change..hopefully this is the end of this whole thing and we can move on 2 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted July 24, 2019 Share Posted July 24, 2019 And now.................................................The 'intelligence' committee..........................? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted July 24, 2019 Share Posted July 24, 2019 Schiff starts off saying the report shows Trump's "disloyalty to country" then says "it might not have been criminal" (after YEARS of saying it was). What a turd bucket. 4 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted July 24, 2019 Share Posted July 24, 2019 3 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Schiff starts off saying the report shows Trump's "disloyalty to country" then says "it might not have been criminal" (after YEARS of saying it was). What a turd bucket. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
US Egg Posted July 24, 2019 Share Posted July 24, 2019 3 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Schiff starts off saying the report shows Trump's "disloyalty to country" then says "it might not have been criminal" (after YEARS of saying it was). What a turd bucket. .....more like a turd tanker. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted July 24, 2019 Share Posted July 24, 2019 Nunes, “Welcome to the last gasp of the Russian conspiracy theory.” 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prickly Pete Posted July 24, 2019 Share Posted July 24, 2019 I think Mark McGuire had a better performance than Mueller.. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted July 24, 2019 Share Posted July 24, 2019 Schiff is such a ****head. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whatdrought Posted July 24, 2019 Share Posted July 24, 2019 39 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Was I the only one tickled every time a dem closed their time with "NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW"... (unless you cross the border illegally, then it's fine) Was it up there with them all starting with "first, let me just say Mrs. Ford, I believe you and I love you and I support you and I am so sorry that all of this happened to you" etc. etc. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldTimeAFLGuy Posted July 24, 2019 Share Posted July 24, 2019 1 hour ago, 4merper4mer said: .....guess I should be surprised the Post portrays Bob as a "victim" now...how shocking (COUGH)........ Republicans attack Mueller probe as Democrats press on obstruction Washington Post Staff 30 mins ago https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/mueller-testimony-congress-live/2019/07/24/d51a82d6-aca1-11e9-bc5c-e73b603e7f38_story.html?utm_term=.f48197ba5773 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted July 24, 2019 Share Posted July 24, 2019 We're going to need this re-done 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whatdrought Posted July 24, 2019 Share Posted July 24, 2019 (edited) 6 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Schiff is such a ****head. He looks like James Spaders bad stunt double in a film about Spader's character as a Pedophile. Schiff looks pissed that Mueller isn't just agreeing to everything... Edited July 24, 2019 by whatdrought 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Blitz Posted July 24, 2019 Share Posted July 24, 2019 Oh..... Weird. That's not what chryon has been screaming on CNN for 4 hours. 2 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jrober38 Posted July 24, 2019 Share Posted July 24, 2019 1 hour ago, DC Tom said: What do you think Mueller's job was? I mean, the DoJ policy predated Mueller's investigation. It was in place before he started. So if it was somehow his job to get a criminal indictment against the President, it was known at his appointment that he'd never succeed. His job was to establish if the Russians interfered with the election, and to determine if the Trump campaign conspired with them along the way. In investigating those things, they established that Russia did interfere, and during the process it seems as though Trump attempted to obstruct justice multiple times, including a couple attempts at witness tampering. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts