thebug Posted November 9, 2019 Share Posted November 9, 2019 5 minutes ago, LBSeeBallLBGetBall said: Just curious. Have you finally decided to stop raping children? Where did that come from? I am not Trump! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LB3 Posted November 9, 2019 Share Posted November 9, 2019 Just now, thebug said: Where did that come from? I am not Trump! Projection. Hopefully you stop your sick ways and repent before you die. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thebug Posted November 9, 2019 Share Posted November 9, 2019 (edited) 15 minutes ago, LBSeeBallLBGetBall said: Projection. Hopefully you stop your sick ways and repent before you die. ??????? 15 minutes ago, LBSeeBallLBGetBall said: Projection. Hopefully you stop your sick ways and repent before you die. You like balls eh? It’s ok, you can answer when you are no longer choking on them teabag boy! Edited November 9, 2019 by thebug Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LB3 Posted November 9, 2019 Share Posted November 9, 2019 21 minutes ago, thebug said: ??????? You like balls eh? It’s ok, you can answer when you are no longer choking on them teabag boy! Hopefully your kids get the therapy they need after what you've done to them Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thebug Posted November 9, 2019 Share Posted November 9, 2019 4 minutes ago, LBSeeBallLBGetBall said: Hopefully your kids get the therapy they need after what you've done to them You suck at this. Not like you suck balls, but. LBSeeBallsLBSuckBalls Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted November 9, 2019 Share Posted November 9, 2019 https://twitter.com/ChadPergram/status/1192997491404410880 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kemp Posted November 9, 2019 Share Posted November 9, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4merper4mer Posted November 9, 2019 Share Posted November 9, 2019 17 minutes ago, Kemp said: All you have to do to nail Trump on that is change the definition of the words value and personal. That shouldn't be too hard. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Locomark Posted November 9, 2019 Share Posted November 9, 2019 15 minutes ago, Kemp said: This!!!!! FYI every major company and every major official in this country dealing with foreign governments, especially Haley, know what how Bribery is defined. ITS REQUIRED as part of their role. If she worked for a company , she would’ve fired for saying this because it would be against company policy and shows ignorance of the law. But since her boss is also breaking the law and appear untouchable, this is the broken democracy you get. Let’s face it, this country probably will never impeach a president and that is why Trump made his infamous statement about Times Square a few years ago. However he is certainly guilty of committing crimes and the American people have a way of correcting their democracy when they see people who are regularly full of crap. All those people that he has trashed after leaving his administration tell you the difficulties they had with him. Add the bribery item to the willing invitation to Russia, wikileaks, and China to meddle with our elections and any sane person who is patriot can’t think that is good for America. This guy just drove a truck through our democracy in so many ways yet seems untouchable..so much for the quality of our constitution and our checks and balances! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Albwan Posted November 9, 2019 Share Posted November 9, 2019 1 hour ago, Kemp said: It's funny, if a republican does something its a crime, if democrats do the same thing its " " Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thebug Posted November 9, 2019 Share Posted November 9, 2019 1 minute ago, Albwan said: It's funny, if a republican does something its a crime, if democrats do the same thing its " " It would also be a crime. Lock them up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoCal Deek Posted November 9, 2019 Share Posted November 9, 2019 Just now, Doc said: Biden? So that means that Trump's request to investigate him was proper? For the one millionth time...Trump did NOT ask the Ukrainian President to investigate Biden! He asked him to look into corruption in the Ukraine. Read the transcript! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted November 9, 2019 Share Posted November 9, 2019 9 minutes ago, thebug said: It would also be a crime. Lock them up. Does the "them" include Biden? If so, doesn't that means that Trump's request to investigate him was proper? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted November 9, 2019 Share Posted November 9, 2019 11 minutes ago, Albwan said: It's funny, if a republican does something its a crime, if democrats do the same thing its " " It's "enlightened policy", and you're a racist Nazi for insinuating anything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoCal Deek Posted November 9, 2019 Share Posted November 9, 2019 How in the world would the President’s request be considered asking for a PERSONAL favor when he specifically brings the Attorney General into the request? If it was even marginally illegal then the Attorney General has a responsibility to inform him of such. This is not the intent of this law! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thebug Posted November 9, 2019 Share Posted November 9, 2019 9 minutes ago, Doc said: Does the "them" include Biden? If so, doesn't that means that Trump's request to investigate him was proper? They both would have been locked up long before this could have happened. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warren Zevon Posted November 9, 2019 Share Posted November 9, 2019 14 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said: How in the world would the President’s request be considered asking for a PERSONAL favor when he specifically brings the Attorney General into the request? If it was even marginally illegal then the Attorney General has a responsibility to inform him of such. This is not the intent of this law! Trump your daddy or something? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted November 9, 2019 Share Posted November 9, 2019 1 hour ago, Locomark said: This!!!!! FYI every major company and every major official in this country dealing with foreign governments, especially Haley, know what how Bribery is defined. ITS REQUIRED as part of their role. If she worked for a company , she would’ve fired for saying this because it would be against company policy and shows ignorance of the law. But since her boss is also breaking the law and appear untouchable, this is the broken democracy you get. Let’s face it, this country probably will never impeach a president and that is why Trump made his infamous statement about Times Square a few years ago. However he is certainly guilty of committing crimes and the American people have a way of correcting their democracy when they see people who are regularly full of crap. All those people that he has trashed after leaving his administration tell you the difficulties they had with him. Add the bribery item to the willing invitation to Russia, wikileaks, and China to meddle with our elections and any sane person who is patriot can’t think that is good for America. This guy just drove a truck through our democracy in so many ways yet seems untouchable..so much for the quality of our constitution and our checks and balances! You would be hard-pressed to find a major politician in the past 100 years who did not personally or indirectly benefit from policies implemented or decisions made while running for or holding public office. From benefit programs, to sweetheart deals, to legislation, to pay-for play, to who works where after their time in office, to former presidents/senators/congress members working where and for whom they work post govt—government is THE largest and most corrupt (by your definition) ‘corporation’ in history. On the other hand, a citizen supporting the dismantling of an administration through phony charges and the weaponization of intelligence is no friend to patriotism or sanity. Your passion is acknowledged, your naïveté stunning. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoCal Deek Posted November 9, 2019 Share Posted November 9, 2019 5 minutes ago, Gary Busey said: Trump your daddy or something? No Gary, he’s not. I just happen to know something about how things actually work. Apparently you do not. 1 minute ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said: You would be hard-pressed to find a major politician in the past 100 years who did not personally or indirectly benefit from policies implemented or decisions made while running for or holding public office. From benefit programs, to sweetheart deals, to legislation, to pay-for play, to who works where after their time in office, to former presidents/senators/congress members working where and for whom they work post govt—government is THE largest and most corrupt (by your definition) ‘corporation’ in history. On the other hand, a citizen supporting the dismantling of an administration through phony charges and the weaponization of intelligence is no friend to patriotism or sanity. Your passion is acknowledged, your naïveté stunning. The law is specific. It’s intended to keep government employees from receiving PERSONAL favors. It does NOT say anything about POLITICAL favors. If it was intended for political favors that would mean that no organization doing business with the government could ever make a contribution to a political campaign! Geez people....wake up! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted November 9, 2019 Share Posted November 9, 2019 21 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said: No Gary, he’s not. I just happen to know something about how things actually work. Apparently you do not. The law is specific. It’s intended to keep government employees from receiving PERSONAL favors. It does NOT say anything about POLITICAL favors. If it was intended for political favors that would mean that no organization doing business with the government could ever make a contribution to a political campaign! Geez people....wake up! I'd retype everything I just typed but it would take too long. Plus, it would be redundant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts