mrags Posted February 2, 2019 Share Posted February 2, 2019 On 1/31/2019 at 10:10 PM, LeGOATski said: If this was a hoax, it should be easily identified as one, right? Investigators can tell from the injuries if they were self-inflicted...they'll inspect the scene for disturbances and other evidence. They'll get reports from the hospital staff. You'd have to be pretty crazy to attempt this. Or a clueless idiot leftist. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted February 2, 2019 Share Posted February 2, 2019 Sounds more and more like bullshiite. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KD in CA Posted February 2, 2019 Share Posted February 2, 2019 1 minute ago, mrags said: Or a clueless idiot leftist. Or helping to create more of the manufactured "Trump = racism" narrative the same week two black Senators are announcing their candidency for President in a crowded field. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted February 2, 2019 Share Posted February 2, 2019 That he won't turn over his cell phone tells me he's lying. Next thing you know, he'll destroy it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoSaint Posted February 2, 2019 Share Posted February 2, 2019 42 minutes ago, Doc said: That he won't turn over his cell phone tells me he's lying. Next thing you know, he'll destroy it. That a celeb isn’t trying to hand over his phone to random officers is abiut the only part that made sense (and yea, I get the Brady joke but I’ve seen similar many places) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted February 2, 2019 Share Posted February 2, 2019 38 minutes ago, NoSaint said: That a celeb isn’t trying to hand over his phone to random officers is abiut the only part that made sense (and yea, I get the Brady joke but I’ve seen similar many places) "Random officers"? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted February 2, 2019 Share Posted February 2, 2019 Haven't read the thread...but I assume you're all in agreement that this was a horrific assault and everyone who owns a MAGA hat is guilty by association, regardless of what the facts may or may not be? 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeGOATski Posted February 2, 2019 Share Posted February 2, 2019 2 hours ago, Doc said: That he won't turn over his cell phone tells me he's lying. Next thing you know, he'll destroy it. You're giving me PTSD here.... 2 minutes ago, DC Tom said: Haven't read the thread...but I assume you're all in agreement that this was a horrific assault and everyone who owns a MAGA hat is guilty by association, regardless of what the facts may or may not be? The hate flows through this thread. (insert image of Emperor Palpatine here) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted February 2, 2019 Share Posted February 2, 2019 2 hours ago, Doc said: That he won't turn over his cell phone tells me he's lying. Next thing you know, he'll destroy it. Then we'll find out his friend has the nickname "the deflator," but only because he's on a diet. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KD in CA Posted February 2, 2019 Share Posted February 2, 2019 6 minutes ago, DC Tom said: Haven't read the thread...but I assume you're all in agreement that this was a horrific assault and everyone who owns a MAGA hat is guilty by association, regardless of what the facts may or may not be? I'm Kamala Harris and I approve this message. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted February 2, 2019 Share Posted February 2, 2019 Does anyone know where Ralph Northam was that night? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExiledInIllinois Posted February 3, 2019 Share Posted February 3, 2019 (edited) 16 hours ago, bbb said: Next up for Kamala - outlawing train robberies! Just saying... If the whole town was in on it, especially the authorities, who's going to jail? Especially in an era with weak Federal oversight. ?? Who gets charged with murder? I know you are not purposely trying to be obtuse. It's very confusing. You're looking at it from the 2019 eyes... Not with 1899 eyes. I think you're still confusing the actual act of hanging vs. mob action that sometimes didn't result in certain death. Did you understand what I quoted above? I will quote it again below. Lynching didn't always mean certain death. There is a perception, a PERCEPTION that it did mean certain death. I take from this statement that not all lynchings involved certain death. I know, it's very confusing: "...The perception is that a lynching always involved a certain means of death — whether by hanging or shooting or burning. ..." The mob action was also a form of intimidation. Formal definition, which includes death. What anti-lynching laws seem to have wanted to establish is criminalizing the mob action and acting without legal authority. verb (used with object) to put to death, especially by hanging, by mob action and without legal authority. Can be confused hang lynch (see synonym study at hang) Edited February 3, 2019 by ExiledInIllinois Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoSaint Posted February 3, 2019 Share Posted February 3, 2019 2 hours ago, Doc said: "Random officers"? Yea, and? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExiledInIllinois Posted February 3, 2019 Share Posted February 3, 2019 4 hours ago, Marv's Neighbor said: Think it was the weather or lack of targets? A little of both. What came first, the chicken or the egg? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted February 3, 2019 Share Posted February 3, 2019 53 minutes ago, NoSaint said: Yea, and? And where do you get that they're "random officers"? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KD in CA Posted February 3, 2019 Share Posted February 3, 2019 2 minutes ago, Doc said: And where do you get that they're "random officers"? I wonder how he confirmed they were random officers and not the officers assigned to investigate the allegations. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted February 3, 2019 Share Posted February 3, 2019 2 minutes ago, KD in CA said: I wonder how he confirmed they were random officers and not the officers assigned to investigate the allegations. I have no idea. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoSaint Posted February 3, 2019 Share Posted February 3, 2019 54 minutes ago, KD in CA said: I wonder how he confirmed they were random officers and not the officers assigned to investigate the allegations. And for the guy making the allegations what are they but random officers? Y’all really hung on that word. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shrader Posted February 3, 2019 Share Posted February 3, 2019 14 hours ago, MarkAF43 said: I didn't even know who this guy was until I googled his name and apparently he was in the Mighty Ducks. He was Terry Hall. one third of the famed "Oreo" line from the movie. Thanks to you, I just learned that Fulton Reed went on to become Foggy Nelson from Daredevil. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted February 3, 2019 Share Posted February 3, 2019 50 minutes ago, NoSaint said: And for the guy making the allegations what are they but random officers? Y’all really hung on that word. I don't think Smollet thinks they're random. What I do think is that he's lying about being on the phone with his agent at the time of the alleged attack and he's not giving up his phone because it would prove that and destroy his case definitively. Better to have the doubt. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.