Is "faith" a requirement under McD?

[Sky Diver]

5 minutes ago, Wroughting said:

What a weird juxtaposition this thread is. Non-christians speculating without evidence, Christians asking for more. The truth is probably somewhere in the middle, I think  McDermott prefers Christians, but mostly from a team building perspective. Belief can be a powerful thing, we'll see how it plays out. 

 

I think he prefers guys that buy into his team concept and coaching philosophy.

Edited May 15, 2018 by Sky Diver

[SouthNYfan]

14 minutes ago, Rochesterfan said:

 

 

But it doesn’t and it need not create a Christian environment.  It allows a place for people of any faith and no faith to come together and talk.  It allows those of strong faith to form bonds off the field both individually and with families.  

 

Mostly it it gives a place for those that want or need it support and comfort.  It is not a requirement and not everyone partakes, but if you watch the NFL and listen post game - you hear a lot of praise to God/Jesus and you see large groups of players from both teams gathering and kneeling and saying a prayer - same thing if a guy has a serious injury.

 

These guys play an incredibly violent game and sometimes groups of them look for something more, but as the Chaplain even says in the article that talked about his hiring - he is not there to force anything - he is there if needed to provide whatever guidance that individual needs.

 

At no point has McDermott put stated anything that puts faith over talent.  He has definitely stated he wants team over individuals, but I think faith is his driving guide not the team.  McDermott has stated that he wants to know each player as an individual so he can find what motivates them - I think the team appreciates that.

 

Many coaches are highly religious and gives thanks to God/Jesus/Mary - some are even over the top - look at Tony Dungy - yet they still reach the team and are successful.

 

I truly think this is a non-issue that people want to use as motivation for why a guy like Rosen was not the pick and I think it is wrong.

 

I should have separated my post more.

I don't have a problem with them having a team chaplain.

 

It was two separate thoughts, the rest of my post was independent of the chaplain

[Hapless Bills Fan]

15 hours ago, Kelly the Dog said:

True. But those are first names. If they were last names you may have a point. I would feel a lot better if we had a Schlomo or a Feivish or Mordachai somewhere in there. 

 

Question: you able to find a combine profile or a scouting report on any of those names?

[Sky Diver]

1 minute ago, SouthNYfan said:

 

I should have separated my post more.

I don't have a problem with them having a team chaplain.

 

It was two separate thoughts, the rest of my post was independent of the chaplain

 

The Patriots, among others, have a full-time chaplain. I have never heard them being accused of having a religious litmus test.

[boyst]

15 minutes ago, ddaryl said:

 

 

Please explain how someone cold contract a certain person based on religious belief, but not fall into the category of discriminating against other faiths.

 

Do you encourage the practice ?

Yes, I do.

 

It's the same principle as a model being fired for being the size of Kate Upton, a NASCAR driver being fined for cursing over his radio, a Doctor breaking ethical obligations of their practice.

 

Freedom of expression and interests of the individual must pertain to business, as well.  That is, unless you think I should be obligated to make you a cake, in which case we will never agree.

[CommonCents]

Golden cake with chocolate frosting sounds delicious. 

[Sky Diver]

3 minutes ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

 

Question: you able to find a combine profile or a scouting report on any of those names?

 

How about Julian Edelman? It's an obvious Jewish name. 

Edited May 15, 2018 by Sky Diver

[Hapless Bills Fan]

15 hours ago, Billsflyer12 said:

http://buffalonews.com/2017/11/24/inside-the-bills-team-chaplain-len-vanden-bos-blends-faith-and-football/

McDermott hired a full time team Chaplin just after he arrived.  I think is may have been the 1st time in organization history, if I remember correctly.

 

I don't know whether or not he was full time, but one of the first things McDermott did after his hire was fire the existing team chaplain.

The team has had "team chaplains" for years.

 

[billsfan1959]

So, what do you get when you cross an agnostic, an insomniac, and a dyslexic....

[Sky Diver]

2 minutes ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

 

I don't know whether or not he was full time, but one of the first things McDermott did after his hire was fire the existing team chaplain.

The team has had "team chaplains" for years.

 

 

I think all NFL teams have a chaplain, but most are part-time.

 

I don't think it's unusual to bring your own guys in, including the chaplain.

Edited May 15, 2018 by Sky Diver

[Hapless Bills Fan]

 

1 minute ago, Sky Diver said:

How about Julian Edelman?

 

KtD was asking about "Schlomo or a Feivish or Mordachai". 

 

My point is, team can only select from the players who are prepared and asking to be selected.

[Dr. K]

16 hours ago, eball said:

If there is one non-football thing I've noticed about McD it is the emphasis he places on faith when discussing the makeup of the team.  I believe he uses the phrase "family, faith, football" frequently which begs the question -- is there a place for a player on this roster who isn't a devout Christian or (perish the thought) is agnostic or an atheist?  An aspect unique to sports is the open practice of religion before, during, and after games.

 

Obviously McD can't come out and openly discriminate on the basis of religion but that's not what I'm asking.  I don't think this is a silly question and I'm not making fun of anyone -- I'm curious to hear others' thoughts and I wonder if a media member would ever ask him that question (i.e., can a player who doesn't claim religious faith as a cornerstone of his life fit into "the process" with the Buffalo Bills)?

Ever since high school the whole evangelical "Fellowship of Christian Athletes" thing has given me the creeps. I can tolerate it in someone like McDermott but I really do not like it. God does not care whether you win or lose a football game and has absolutely no hand in it. Should coaches practice astrology as well?

[SouthNYfan]

11 minutes ago, Sky Diver said:

 

The Patriots, among others, have a full-time chaplain. I have never heard them being accused of having a religious litmus test.

 

You really can't read, can you?

 

I literally said I didn't have a problem with the chaplain, and that post should have been separated into two independent thoughts.

[Sky Diver]

9 minutes ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

 

 

KtD was asking about "Schlomo or a Feivish or Mordachai". 

 

My point is, team can only select from the players who are prepared and asking to be selected.

 

There have been a relatively small number of Jewish NFL players and none are named "Schlomo or a Feivish or Mordachai.  

 

There are no NFL players named Luigi, but I don't infer from that that there is an anti-Italian bias.

 

http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jews-in-the-national-football-league-nf

4 minutes ago, SouthNYfan said:

 

Edited May 15, 2018 by Sky Diver

[Hapless Bills Fan]

12 hours ago, Boyst62 said:

Except contract players like this don't apply to that. But, hey, cool

 

Nonetheless.  IF it were true that the Bills were basing hiring or player selection decisions on religious faith, it would be a big issue in terms of PR if nothing else.

 

I think it's a non-issue, as I doubt it's happening. 

 

18 minutes ago, Sky Diver said:

How about Julian Edelman? It's an obvious Jewish name. 

 

Oh, and you had to raise that one. 

 

Edelman self-identifies as Jewish.  But his father is Jewish, his mother is not, and he states has not converted to Judaism.

So, Orthodox or Conservative Judaism would not recognize him as Jewish, while Reform and Reconstructionist congregations would consider him Jewish.

 

Oy vey this faith thing is complex

 

 

[SouthNYfan]

5 minutes ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

 

Nonetheless.  IF it were true that the Bills were basing hiring or player selection decisions on religious faith, it would be a big issue in terms of PR if nothing else.

 

I think it's a non-issue, as I doubt it's happening.

 

I agree.

 

I have said numerous times that I doubt it's happening, but IF it was, or started to happen, it is a huge issue.

 

The big discussion here is that many seem to feel it wouldn't be a problem.

[Tyrod's friend]

9 hours ago, LABillzFan said:

 

Just that Christianity starts and ends with faith, and faith alone. You can follow any rules you want, but works without faith are good deeds and don't assure your entry to God's kingdom.

 

 

Let me preface by checking myself to remember it's not my place to judge. It's something I still struggle with, but the point here is that, in my mind, it's difficult to believe that anyone who commits to a steady relationship with God will simultaneously do what Mike Vick did, often and brutally. What he was doing was illegal, and his consequences affected many, many people in a very negative way. I think a Christian who spent his time with Christians would have never let the dog thing go on.

 

Just my thoughts.

Let's agree where we can, and let the chips fall where they must. You are well aware of the Scripture that negates part of your text, and I don't see the need to waste many pixels on it. Western culture elevates the human to the position of God, to believe he can ignore whatever he'd like of God's Word in order to exculpate his guilt and excuse abhorrent behavior. 

The most egregious, Godless people I've known can quote the Bible by verse easily and don't breathe a Word of it. But ... you cannot be on the path without it or make of it what you will.

The flip side is also so terribly true. Nothing you can do, no penance paid by word or deed, makes you worthy. It's a fine line between Matthew 22 or 5  and Romans 3. 

We agree more than we disagree.

Vaya con dios. 

[Sky Diver]

10 minutes ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

 

Nonetheless.  IF it were true that the Bills were basing hiring or player selection decisions on religious faith, it would be a big issue in terms of PR if nothing else.

 

I think it's a non-issue, as I doubt it's happening. 

 

 

Oh, and you had to raise that one. 

 

Edelman self-identifies as Jewish.  But his father is Jewish, his mother is not, and he states has not converted to Judaism.

So, Orthodox or Conservative Judaism would not recognize him as Jewish, while Reform and Reconstructionist congregations would consider him Jewish.

 

Oy vey this faith thing is complex

 

 

 

Rosen's father is Jewish and his mother is a Quaker. I guess technically he isn't Jewish either, but he self-identifies as being Jewish. Yes. oy vey.

3 minutes ago, SouthNYfan said:

 

I agree.

 

I have said numerous times that I doubt it's happening, but IF it was, or started to happen, it is a huge issue.

 

The big discussion here is that many seem to feel it wouldn't be a problem.

 

A lot of things, real or imagined, could become real issues,

Edited May 15, 2018 by Sky Diver

[Pine Barrens Mafia]

5 minutes ago, SouthNYfan said:

The big discussion here is that many seem to feel it wouldn't be a problem.

 

I haven't seen anyone say that.

 

[Hapless Bills Fan]

23 minutes ago, Dr. K said:

Ever since high school the whole evangelical "Fellowship of Christian Athletes" thing has given me the creeps. I can tolerate it in someone like McDermott but I really do not like it. God does not care whether you win or lose a football game and has absolutely no hand in it. Should coaches practice astrology as well?

 

If there are coaches who feel astrology is central to their lives and helps motivate them, why not? (Edit: as long as they win ?)

 

I don't understand the whole "give me the Creeps" thing.  If they're following you about pressuring you to join them after you say "thanks, but No" sure, that's creepy.  Otherwise it's their Constitutional right to express and practice their religion.  Tolerance is your civic duty, and theirs - a fact which appears to be getting lost in today's rhetoric

 

We recently visited Northern Ireland.  Belfast today is one of the safest cities in Europe.  The reminders of the Troubles are all around and on the tour we took, the drivers pointed out some of the steps that were taken (courthouses, police and firestations surrounded by double blast walls topped with military-grade barb wire) and explained what life was like (no busses, had to be searched 1x to enter city center and then at the door to each shop).  That is the legacy of one religion being state-supported and its followers given some legal preferences, and of lack of tolerance between religions.

 

No Thanks.

[Sky Diver]

1 minute ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

 

If there are coaches who feel astrology is central to their lives and helps motivate them, why not?

 

I don't understand the whole "give me the Creeps" thing.  If they're following you about pressuring you to join them after you say "thanks, but No" sure, that's creepy.  Otherwise it's their Constitutional right to express and practice their religion.  Tolerance is your civic duty, and theirs - a fact which appears to be getting lost in today's rhetoric

 

We recently visited Northern Ireland.  Belfast today is one of the safest cities in Europe.  The reminders of the Troubles are all around and on the tour we took, the drivers pointed out some of the steps that were taken (courthouses, police and firestations surrounded by double blast walls topped with military-grade barb wire) and explained what life was like (no busses, had to be searched 1x to enter city center and then at the door to each shop).  That is the legacy of one religion being state-supported and of lack of tolerance.

 

No Thanks.

 

There are radicals that want to remove every vestige of Christianity from the public square even though it's part of our history and cultural heritage. I think that's where this is coming from.

[Ironsdad]

16 hours ago, hondo in seattle said:

I don't think McD considers faith a requirement.

I do think though that if two FAs were available with identical skill sets but only one was a committed church-goer, McD would choose him.   

 

Faith bring bonus points.  

And 'less likely' to be a knuckle head off the field. 

[Hapless Bills Fan]

1 minute ago, Sky Diver said:

There are radicals that want to remove every vestige of Christianity from the public square even though it's part of our history and cultural heritage. I think that's where this is coming from.

 

I think if this discussion wants to "go there", it's far away from football, and prolly needs to move over to PPP.

 

[T master]

Faith the substance of things hoped for the evidence of things not seen !! 

[ddaryl]

29 minutes ago, Boyst62 said:

Yes, I do.

 

It's the same principle as a model being fired for being the size of Kate Upton, a NASCAR driver being fined for cursing over his radio, a Doctor breaking ethical obligations of their practice.

 

Freedom of expression and interests of the individual must pertain to business, as well.  That is, unless you think I should be obligated to make you a cake, in which case we will never agree.

 

 

Very sad... extremely sad, pathetically sad for you or anyone to think its ok to build an all Christian faith based football team when way more than 50% of the fans are not of the same denomination, or to only hire certan people of cetrain faiths.  There is no justification for this

 

What you are saying/doing is nothing more than  bigotry.. This is why I can never support any man made organized religion. My god doesn't hate.. or condone it. Obvioulsy yours does 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[Dr. K]

1 minute ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

 

If there are coaches who feel astrology is central to their lives and helps motivate them, why not?

 

I don't understand the whole "give me the Creeps" thing.  If they're following you about pressuring you to join them after you say "thanks, but No" sure, that's creepy.  Otherwise it's their Constitutional right to express and practice their religion.  Tolerance is your civic duty, and theirs - a fact which appears to be getting lost in today's rhetoric

 

We recently visited Northern Ireland.  Belfast today is one of the safest cities in Europe.  The reminders of the Troubles are all around and on the tour we took, the drivers pointed out some of the steps that were taken (courthouses, police and firestations surrounded by double blast walls topped with military-grade barb wire) and explained what life was like (no busses, had to be searched 1x to enter city center and then at the door to each shop).  That is the legacy of one religion being state-supported and of lack of tolerance.

 

No Thanks.

Did you miss the part where I said "I can tolerate it in someone like McDermott"? I agree that tolerance is absolutely essential to civil society. But in fact the thing that I disliked about the FCA was that they DID "follow you about pressuring you to join them."  That's what "evangelical" means. You'll just have to tolerate that this kind of ever-present public profession of Christian faith, in areas that have nothing to do with religion, bothers me. 

 

I think that having faith in something is indeed a powerful force in human affairs. But Jesus said (Matthew 6:5), "And when you pray, you must not be like the hypocrites. For they love to stand and pray in the synagogues and at the street corners, that they may be seen by others. Truly, I say to you, they have received their reward." I do not begrudge anyone their sources of inspiration and faith. I just wish the proselytizers would respect the right of the rest of us to find our way with fewer public professions. And to the degree that they let their religion determine their choices in non-religious areas, I feel I have the right to question it. 

[Hapless Bills Fan]

45 minutes ago, Sky Diver said:

I think he prefers guys that buy into his team concept and coaching philosophy.

 

I agree.  I would strongly doubt that Beane or McDermott would practice any kind of explicit questioning about someone's religious beliefs.

 

However, it's entirely legit to ask interview questions about how a player handles a stressful situation like regrouping after a bad game or rehabbing an injury, and if expressions of faith come out there, the answer can be noted.

 

If they actually would select on the basis of anything but football talent, athletic abilities, and demonstrated work ethic/football intelligence they would be handicapping themselves.

[FappyTheClown]

In McDermott we trust.

[Tyrod's friend]

1 minute ago, ddaryl said:

 

 

Very sad... extremely sad, pathetically sad for you or anyone to think its ok to build an all Christian faith based football team when way more than 50% of the fans are not of the same denomination, or to only hire certan people of cetrain faiths.  There is no justification for this

 

What you are saying/doing is nothing more than  bigotry.. This is why I can never support any man made organized religion. My god doesn't hate.. or condone it. Obvioulsy yours does 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Let's just agree you can see the obvious issues with these two conflicting statements. 

Each of us has his own walk, his own relationship with God and they are intensely personal - even if it is to reject that relationship. I think glorifying that relationship is the singularly most important thing you can do. It strikes me that the alternative is to surrender yourself to other human beings. 

My faith calls me to bring every part of my world into some intersection with God. Work, family, rest, awake time, the things that own. I'd encourage anyone to do the same and I'd like to think that is the perspective of our coach. It isn't in any way bigotry and I dare anyone here to make the point that it is.

 

[Sky Diver]

4 minutes ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

 

I agree.  I would strongly doubt that Beane or McDermott would practice any kind of explicit questioning about someone's religious beliefs.

 

However, it's entirely legit to ask interview questions about how a player handles a stressful situation like regrouping after a bad game or rehabbing an injury, and if expressions of faith come out there, the answer can be noted.

 

If they actually would select on the basis of anything but football talent, athletic abilities, and demonstrated work ethic/football intelligence they would be handicapping themselves.

 

They are going to get the players that they think are best suited to win games. If they did otherwise they wouldn’t be in the NFL.

[IDBillzFan]

7 hours ago, Domdab99 said:

The racist, xenophobic, gun-loving, education-hating, environment-killing, authoritarian, myopic hypocrisy of it all. This administration, and those who support it, are literally anti-Jesus's philosophy while unironically spouting his words.

 

Not everyone, of course. But it does seem they like candidates who are not only moronic, but pederasty and sometimes criminal. 

 

Hope that clears it up. 

 

YIkes. That's quite the broad stroke of Christians.

 

Racist. Xenophobes. Gun-loving. Child molesters. You forgot mother rapers. Father stabbers. FATHER Rapers. FATHER RAPERS right there next to you on the Group WH bench!!!

 

It sounds less like you're afraid of Christians and more like you're afraid of people who don't think like you've been told to think.

 

It's a good discussion to have so long as it remains a discussion. The moment it turns into people trying to group together individuals for the sake of making it easier to hit a target, it's best for me to avoid that rabbit hole here. We'll leave it at that for this board. I'm happy the mods have let this discussion continue here without moving the thread to PPP.

[Hapless Bills Fan]

8 minutes ago, Dr. K said:

Did you miss the part where I said "I can tolerate it in someone like McDermott"?

 

I missed the part where you said "I can tolerate it in everyone"

 

8 minutes ago, Dr. K said:

I agree that tolerance is absolutely essential to civil society. But in fact the thing that I disliked about the FCA was that they DID "follow you about pressuring you to join them."  That's what "evangelical" means. You'll just have to tolerate that this kind of ever-present public profession of Christian faith, in areas that have nothing to do with religion, bothers me. 

 

I've lived in the Bible Belt (kind of the sweaty part creased in the middle from crossing the small of the back, but still) and have close relatives who are Evangelicals.

Most move off with a "Thank you, and I respect your faith, but not for me".  Occasionally one needs to escalate to pointing out that respect must be mutual.

 

 

[Tyrod's friend]

6 minutes ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

If they actually would select on the basis of anything but football talent, athletic abilities, and demonstrated work ethic/football intelligence they would be handicapping themselves.

You give up something and gain something. 53 individuals of a unified, collective mindset over time will overcome singular talents - and frankly we saw that as clear as massive probiscus between my eyes last year. 

And what's more, it is the sort of organization a community can back. 

[Dr. K]

19 minutes ago, Sky Diver said:

 

There are radicals that want to remove every vestige of Christianity from the public square even though it's part of our history and cultural heritage. I think that's where this is coming from.

There are more people who are insisting that the U.S. is a "Christian republic," the kind of people who inserted the words "under God" into the Pledge of Allegiance in 1954 and "In God We Trust" on currency in 1956, who think that an atheist cannot be a good citizen and who maintained in the face of all evidence that Barack Obama was a Muslim (as if that would somehow disqualify him to be president).

 

The founding fathers went out of their way to keep any reference to God out of the Constitution. Thomas Jefferson: "But it does me no injury for my neighbor to say there are twenty gods or no God. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg."

 

[Hapless Bills Fan]

3 minutes ago, LABillzFan said:

 

YIkes. That's quite the broad stroke of Christians.

 

Racist. Xenophobes. Gun-loving. Child molesters. You forgot mother rapers. Father stabbers. FATHER Rapers. FATHER RAPERS right there next to you on the Group WH bench!!!

 

It sounds less like you're afraid of Christians and more like you're afraid of people who don't think like you've been told to think.

 

It's a good discussion to have so long as it remains a discussion. The moment it turns into people trying to group together individuals for the sake of making it easier to hit a target, it's best for me to avoid that rabbit hole here. We'll leave it at that for this board. I'm happy the mods have let this discussion continue here without moving the thread to PPP.

 

Watching it closely.   Feel it's football-topical given McDermott's strongly and openly professed faith.

If this general politicized branch of it continues,  will redirect.

 

" He said, "What were you arrested for, kid?" And I said, "Litterin'." And they all moved away from me on the bench there, and the hairy eyeball and all kinds of mean nasty things, till I said, "And creating a nuisance." And they all came back, shook my hand, and we had a great time on the bench, talkin' about crime, mother stabbing, father raping, all kinds of groovy things that we was talking about on the bench. "   

 

? Alices Restaurant.

[Dr. K]

6 minutes ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

 

I missed the part where you said "I can tolerate it in everyone"

 

 

I've lived in the Bible Belt (kind of the sweaty part creased in the middle from crossing the small of the back, but still) and have close relatives who are Evangelicals.

Most move off with a "Thank you, and I respect your faith, but not for me".  Occasionally one needs to escalate to pointing out that respect must be mutual.

 

 

I cannot tolerate it in someone who is trying to abridge my freedom and force their religious views into civil society. McDermott seems to me to be pretty harmless, though he clearly is an evangelical who believes the hand of God is everywhere present in his life. 

[IDBillzFan]

16 minutes ago, Dr. K said:

But in fact the thing that I disliked about the FCA was that they DID "follow you about pressuring you to join them."  That's what "evangelical" means.

 

That's actually not what evangelical means. I understand how you would think that way. I lived in NC for years, and to me evangelical meant Tammy Faye Baker.

 

I've come to learn that's like saying 'being a vegan means you follow people around pressuring them to give up flavor.'

 

1 minute ago, Dr. K said:

I cannot tolerate it in someone who is trying to abridge my freedom and force their religious views into civil society.

 

Where do you see people forcing their religious views into civil society?

[Dr. K]

Just now, LABillzFan said:

 

That's actually not what evangelical means. I understand how you would think that way. I lived in NC for years, and to me evangelical meant Tammy Faye Baker.

 

I've come to learn that's like saying 'being a vegan means you follow people around pressuring them to give up flavor.'

 

I think this conversation is veering way off track, but I'll just quote this (from Wikipedia, though I could cite it from many other sources, including evangelical church publications) and do my best to retire from the field of play: "Evangelicals believe in the centrality of the conversion or the "born again" experience in receiving salvation, in the authority of the Bible as God's revelation to humanity, and in spreading the Christian message." 

[IDBillzFan]

Just now, Dr. K said:

I think this conversation is veering way off track, but I'll just quote this (from Wikipedia, though I could cite it from many other sources, including evangelical church publications) and do my best to retire from the field of play: "Evangelicals believe in the centrality of the conversion or the "born again" experience in receiving salvation, in the authority of the Bible as God's revelation to humanity, and in spreading the Christian message." 

 

Yes, of course. One of the things asked of Christians is to make disciples, and you do that by spreading the word of the gospel. 

 

I'll assume you're similarly concerned with girl scouts pushing cookies outside of Wegmans, Apple pushing a camera that makes phone calls, product placement in movies, and pretty much any other group which spreads its primary message in an effort to recruit for and advance their cause?

[ddaryl]

11 minutes ago, Tyrod's friend said:

Let's just agree you can see the obvious issues with these two conflicting statements. 

Each of us has his own walk, his own relationship with God and they are intensely personal - even if it is to reject that relationship. I think glorifying that relationship is the singularly most important thing you can do. It strikes me that the alternative is to surrender yourself to other human beings. 

My faith calls me to bring every part of my world into some intersection with God. Work, family, rest, awake time, the things that own. I'd encourage anyone to do the same and I'd like to think that is the perspective of our coach. It isn't in any way bigotry and I dare anyone here to make the point that it is.

 

 

 

I'm lost here.

 

Its a personal journey.. One that should never intersect with employment simply based upon the fact that we all have this seperate personal relationship, and a person should never be denied an opportunity because they didn't chose a specific religion. Your personal journey is personal. I don't think anyone should judge anyone, or should deny anyone anything based upon a [[ersonal belief...

 

If a qualified person is being denied an opportunity simply based upon what religion they subscribe to then I have very large issues with this, and a line has been crossed.

 

So the originsal topic is McDermott only bringing in players who meet his religous criteria. This is how i interpreted the original post and If this is the case then I would not be ok with it, because its is simply uncalled for and it shows an intolerance to others