Jump to content

Spotrac Looks at the Money Each Team Has Spent on QB since 2013


Recommended Posts

I’m not sure that this really says anything other than the teams that have high priced QBs under contract the longest spend the most.

Just now, mattynh said:

Bears at #5...ouch.   

 

Must be nice to be the Pats and be at #15....ridiculous

Those 2 are outliers for sure.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Kirby Jackson said:

I’m not sure that this really says anything other than the teams that have high priced QBs under contract the longest spend the most.

Those 2 are outliers for sure.

 

It says choose carefully and spend wisely.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What's hilarious is that St. Louis, Philadelphia, and Minnesota are all on that list with the top player being the same guy: Sam Bradford. 

 

Wow....his agent must be a genius living on an island with some hot local talent bringing him cold drinks somewhere.....damn.

  • Haha (+1) 3
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, BigBuff423 said:

What's hilarious is that St. Louis, Philadelphia, and Minnesota are all on that list with the top player being the same guy: Sam Bradford. 

 

Wow....his agent must be a genius living on an island with some hot local talent bringing him cold drinks somewhere.....damn.

 

How about Osweiler for the Texans and Browns. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Kirby Jackson said:

I’m not sure that this really says anything other than the teams that have high priced QBs under contract the longest spend the most.

Those 2 are outliers for sure.

It helps when there's an agenda to be against Tyrod Taylor when you post things like this. It really is devoid of any information which helps construct an argument that the bills are either in good position or bad position. 

 

Some teams are starting a rookie quarterback with draft contracts in sending their backup position.  Other teams might have a cheap rookie contract as their starter with an expensive backup. 

 

Miami, Dallas, New England... Those three teams are in the middle in all looking at a different quarterback situations. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, BigBuff423 said:

What's hilarious is that St. Louis, Philadelphia, and Minnesota are all on that list with the top player being the same guy: Sam Bradford. 

 

Wow....his agent must be a genius living on an island with some hot local talent bringing him cold drinks somewhere.....damn.

 

 

bradford was the last 1st overall 1st rd draft pick before the Rookie salary cap was implemented which skews data some for the Rams

 

ironically Bradford was traded to Philly for Nick Foles and some change back to St Louis

Edited by ddaryl
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, 26CornerBlitz said:

 

It says choose carefully and spend wisely.  

When it comes to choosing, we've done more than anyone. Well, tied. We took 17 chances to find a starting quarterback to take us to the Super Bowl and win. 

 

If you went back to the Modern Age beginning of football, I'd say 95 or so you might find this to be a different Outlook. But still offer very little in conclusion

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, BigBuff423 said:

What's hilarious is that St. Louis, Philadelphia, and Minnesota are all on that list with the top player being the same guy: Sam Bradford.

Wow....his agent must be a genius living on an island with some hot local talent bringing him cold drinks somewhere.....damn.

 

IK right? 

 

Sam Bradford must also be way up there on the lifetime earnings list.....in addition to what he earned, his schnoz was all over the place in local St Louis television ads.

24 minutes ago, Boyst62 said:

When it comes to choosing, we've done more than anyone. Well, tied. We took 17 chances to find a starting quarterback to take us to the Super Bowl and win.

 

17 chances to find a starting QB?  How do you figure that?

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, jeremy2020 said:

lol, Brock Osweiler on there for 2 teams. What a colossal miss that was...

 

Leaves out that his contract was traded WITH a pick just to get the browns to take him!! Lolol

They basically used cap space to buy a pick

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...