row_33 Posted February 1, 2018 Share Posted February 1, 2018 The Queen says No to FBI pot-smoking members Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted February 1, 2018 Share Posted February 1, 2018 17 minutes ago, Boyst62 said: I'm gonna mess my pants when my family member is in one of these lists. ? Please try to keep your family member IN your pants, young man. This is a family-friendly site. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted February 1, 2018 Share Posted February 1, 2018 8 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Nunes must go for writing a memo that is a national security risk, materially wrong, and fiction? I mean...that is really stupid. It's a conspiracy theory that puts national security at risk, it's factually incorrect so we can't let people read it, it's fake new we're doing our best to keep in the news. The only reason I wouldn't argue it represents real fear of the contents of the memo is because this is just normal idiocy for Pelosi. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted February 1, 2018 Share Posted February 1, 2018 1 hour ago, Deranged Rhino said: NO REDACTION, NO MERCY Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted February 1, 2018 Share Posted February 1, 2018 Just now, joesixpack said: NO REDACTION, NO MERCY Releasing names may very well be a threat to national security. I'd settle for a compromise, and redact only the names of those not elected officials or civil servants. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted February 1, 2018 Share Posted February 1, 2018 20 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: !@#$ing release that **** already!! Just now, DC Tom said: Releasing names may very well be a threat to national security. I'd settle for a compromise, and redact only the names of those not elected officials or civil servants. If they've committed crimes, they need to be exposed to the light of day. No redaction. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted February 1, 2018 Share Posted February 1, 2018 1 minute ago, joesixpack said: !@#$ing release that **** already!! If they've committed crimes, they need to be exposed to the light of day. No redaction. If they've committed crimes, that's the last thing they need. It makes it more difficult to put them on trial. This is all bull **** anyway. Pelosi doesn't really want Nunes removed. If she did, we'd have seen several congressional staffers coming forward accusing him of sexual misconduct by now. This is just a campaign to discredit the memo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted February 1, 2018 Author Share Posted February 1, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted February 1, 2018 Share Posted February 1, 2018 6 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Don't need the names published to generate enough outrage to get a special prosecutor appointed to investigate the people who's names are redacted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted February 1, 2018 Share Posted February 1, 2018 3 minutes ago, DC Tom said: Don't need the names published to generate enough outrage to get a special prosecutor appointed to investigate the people who's names are redacted. Yeah, spelling mistake's are no big deal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted February 1, 2018 Share Posted February 1, 2018 1 minute ago, GG said: Yeah, spelling mistake's are no big deal. Neither are grammatical errors. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted February 1, 2018 Share Posted February 1, 2018 (edited) “Are we done with the flogging?” Lane asked. “It’s never as good as you think it’s going to be,” Roger Sterling mutters, the wind finally out of his sails. Edited February 1, 2018 by row_33 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted February 1, 2018 Share Posted February 1, 2018 You’d think by now, Eric Holder would have figured out that MAYBE he should stop making comments about … well, anything. Honestly, he did such a crap job as the AG that there’s always someone or something out there that will come back and bite him in the arse. Take for example his tweet about the Nunes memo: Quote Eric Holder ✔ @EricHolder People must understand what is at stake by release of the bogus, contrived Nunes memo. It uses normally protected material and puts at risk our intell capabilities in order to derail a legitimate criminal investigation. This is unheard of- it is dangerous and it is irresponsible 12:44 PM - Jan 31, 2018 Yawn. Is there anything more annoying than Holder lecturing Americans about how it’s for our own good that the government hides things from us? Sharyl Attkisson for the TKO: Quote Sharyl Attkisson ✔ @SharylAttkisson I recognized those terms. "Bogus." "Contrived." So familiar. https://twitter.com/EricHolder/status/958757841116057600 … 11:52 AM - Feb 1, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted February 1, 2018 Share Posted February 1, 2018 I still can't understand what the delay is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snafu Posted February 1, 2018 Share Posted February 1, 2018 1 hour ago, Deranged Rhino said: If #RemoveNunes trends on Twitter or Facebook, will Pelosi blame Russian bots again? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Brown Posted February 1, 2018 Share Posted February 1, 2018 24 minutes ago, joesixpack said: I still can't understand what the delay is. Apparently the main concern from the White House is the Trump appointed FBI director may resign if memo is released. I wish they'd release the actual FISA warrant instead of one party's memo which obviously will be slanted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted February 1, 2018 Share Posted February 1, 2018 Just now, Doc Brown said: I wish they'd release the actual FISA warrant instead of one party's memo which obviously will be slanted. Yeah, I really can't take this memo too seriously. It's all competitive crap-slinging at this point. But they probably can't release the FISA warrant, because that's under the judicial branch's jurisdiction, hence has its own umbrella of protections the executive and legislature can't get around. But that again shows the ridiculous theatrical nature of this circus: no one's sued to protect the integrity of the FISA warrant yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snafu Posted February 1, 2018 Share Posted February 1, 2018 1 minute ago, DC Tom said: Yeah, I really can't take this memo too seriously. It's all competitive crap-slinging at this point. But they probably can't release the FISA warrant, because that's under the judicial branch's jurisdiction, hence has its own umbrella of protections the executive and legislature can't get around. But that again shows the ridiculous theatrical nature of this circus: no one's sued to protect the integrity of the FISA warrant yet. Nunes would have been smarter to wait until after Horowitz made his report. And he would have been even smarter still to let his Committee do its job. Nobody's got a damn ounce of patience. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted February 1, 2018 Share Posted February 1, 2018 Apparently Trump has signed off, setting up release for Friday Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bdutton Posted February 1, 2018 Share Posted February 1, 2018 (edited) 43 minutes ago, joesixpack said: I still can't understand what the delay is. The news reported this morning that there is a mandatory delay on any declassified documents released by congress to allow the executive branch to submit an objection. There is no objection from Trump, but the delay is still mandatory. Edited February 1, 2018 by bdutton Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts