simool Posted January 25, 2018 Share Posted January 25, 2018 I was curious where the current look at me posters claiming to have inside sources would rank when compared with some historical names that coincide with the word trust. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kwai San Posted January 25, 2018 Share Posted January 25, 2018 (edited) Bernie over ALL of these clueless clowns by far. Altho Tricky Dick is a CLOSE 2nd. GO BILLS! Edited January 25, 2018 by Kwai San 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Murica Posted January 25, 2018 Share Posted January 25, 2018 I chose Madoff out of anger for the Wilpons. All these guys need to be put on a rocket and shot into the sun to save the human race. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Schmuggs Posted January 25, 2018 Share Posted January 25, 2018 There are no more remaining members with inside sources. They have all been culled off. Leroi was was the only reliable source and he was banned. Now you guys can get your scoops from the media. mlm 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Punching Bag Posted January 25, 2018 Share Posted January 25, 2018 Leroi was banned from handing out towels in Bills locker room? Had not heard that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BringBackOrton Posted January 25, 2018 Share Posted January 25, 2018 Dick was a war hero. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ol Dirty B Posted January 25, 2018 Share Posted January 25, 2018 9 minutes ago, Schmuggs said: There are no more remaining members with inside sources. They have all been culled off. Leroi was was the only reliable source and he was banned. Now you guys can get your scoops from the media. mlm That's fine. Doesn't change my life a bit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TigerJ Posted January 25, 2018 Share Posted January 25, 2018 For me, it's not about whether posters claiming inside info are trustworthy or not. For me it's not about believing or disbelieving what has been claimed. It's not actionable information unless somebody foolishly decides to buy or not buy season tickets because of it. I'm not doing that. It just gets thrown into the collection of off season speculation, rumors, mock drafts and everything else that helps make the off season a little more interesting from a football standpoint. I don't mind Dunkirk Don or Savior Peterson or anybody else making claims of inside info because it does no harm, at least to me. I really don't get the skeptics getting all bent out of shape by it any more than I would get a "true believer" mortgaging the farm because of what he/he has read. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillnutinHouston Posted January 25, 2018 Share Posted January 25, 2018 (edited) 23 minutes ago, TigerJ said: For me, it's not about whether posters claiming inside info are trustworthy or not. For me it's not about believing or disbelieving what has been claimed. It's not actionable information unless somebody foolishly decides to buy or not buy season tickets because of it. I'm not doing that. It just gets thrown into the collection of off season speculation, rumors, mock drafts and everything else that helps make the off season a little more interesting from a football standpoint. I don't mind Dunkirk Don or Savior Peterson or anybody else making claims of inside info because it does no harm, at least to me. I really don't get the skeptics getting all bent out of shape by it any more than I would get a "true believer" mortgaging the farm because of what he/he has read. I couldn't disagree more. If holding the truth in high regard is passe, then call me old fashioned. Anonymous internet or not, I still cling to the belief that we all have an obligation to tell the truth. Stating opinions is perfectly fine; that's the lifeblood of this board. But its not OK to say you have a source when in reality the only one speaking to you is that little voice in your head. We have very passionate people on this board, some of whom are easily manipulated and excited. It's not Ok for them to be used and manipulated by a few pathetic posters whose only distinction is their desperate need for affirmation and attention. These people need empathy and help, not enabling. Edited January 25, 2018 by BillnutinHouston 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RyanC883 Posted January 25, 2018 Share Posted January 25, 2018 what happened to Leori? And did we ever figure out who NeverGiveUp was/is? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnny Hammersticks Posted January 25, 2018 Share Posted January 25, 2018 2 minutes ago, RyanC883 said: what happened to Leori? And did we ever figure out who NeverGiveUp was/is? 1. No one knows. It’s like the lost colony of Roanoke. 2. Chad Kelly 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Augie Posted January 25, 2018 Share Posted January 25, 2018 The poll is flawed. None of the above is not an option. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Now Moment Posted January 25, 2018 Share Posted January 25, 2018 1 hour ago, BillnutinHouston said: I couldn't disagree more. If holding the truth in high regard is passe, then call me old fashioned. Anonymous internet or not, I still cling to the belief that we all have an obligation to tell the truth. Stating opinions is perfectly fine; that's the lifeblood of this board. But its not OK to say you have a source when in reality the only one speaking to you is that little voice in your head. We have very passionate people on this board, some of whom are easily manipulated and excited. It's not Ok for them to be used and manipulated by a few pathetic posters whose only distinction is their desperate need for affirmation and attention. These people need empathy and help, not enabling. So if you don't believe that poster, stop reading their posts. Simple solution. Why does everybody have to go pissing on the poster? Doing that just causes more anger on this board and draws away from it's true intentions. Why create a big ruckus when there is no need to? Some days I come on here and it's like it's a place where people take out their anger on another poster for really no reason. I guess that's the entire internet now though. It's quite the shame. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigDingus Posted January 25, 2018 Share Posted January 25, 2018 Why is there not a "none of the above" option? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
simool Posted January 25, 2018 Author Share Posted January 25, 2018 (edited) 12 minutes ago, BigDingus said: Why is there not a "none of the above" option? Because I did not ask you who you trusted, I asked who you would trust the most. Pick the lesser evil. Edited January 25, 2018 by simool Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigDingus Posted January 25, 2018 Share Posted January 25, 2018 3 minutes ago, simool said: Because I did not ask you who you trusted, I asked who you would trust the most. Pick the lesser evil. But that assumes that there has to be at least SOME trust to begin with if you can pick one to trust over another. I guess I'd trust all of them more than Bernie Madoff. That's all I know lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
simool Posted January 25, 2018 Author Share Posted January 25, 2018 1 minute ago, BigDingus said: But that assumes that there has to be at least SOME trust to begin with if you can pick one to trust over another. I guess I'd trust all of them more than Bernie Madoff. That's all I know lol. No trust necessary... you can distrust them all, just select the one that you distrust the least. For me, I would trust Bernie the most. He turned a good amount of coin for a very long run, and you would not want to be getting on that train late. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fadingpain Posted January 25, 2018 Share Posted January 25, 2018 Had to go with Bernie Madoff given the choices. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paulus Posted January 25, 2018 Share Posted January 25, 2018 SaviorPete shitposting is the best. I think some of yall really undervalue the art of shitpost. 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Augie Posted January 25, 2018 Share Posted January 25, 2018 3 minutes ago, Fadingpain said: Had to go with Bernie Madoff given the choices. Madoff takes my money directly, so the effects of Bernie appeals to me the least. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts