Jump to content

GDT: Saints at Vikings


Recommended Posts

48 minutes ago, NoSaint said:

Real talk- why was 52 short zone instead of a safety as center fielder for a freak play like this?

 

And why is 26 covering the short out at 10 yard when even that gives them nothing.  

 

A more standard quarters defense covering 4 across would have been way more appropriate.  That seems like a very bad defensive call knowing the game situation.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, matter2003 said:

That was the Saints version of the Music City Miracle

I disagree, the Saints just screwed up and it cost them. They werent screwed by the Refs or a review. Had he stepped on the white of the sideline while going to the end zone or a knee grazed the ground after a saints player tried talking him, I would say it's similar. This was just a blown play by the defence allowing the Vikes to win it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, apuszczalowski said:

I disagree, the Saints just screwed up and it cost them. They werent screwed by the Refs or a review. Had he stepped on the white of the sideline while going to the end zone or a knee grazed the ground after a saints player tried talking him, I would say it's similar. This was just a blown play by the defence allowing the Vikes to win it.

 

The Bills also blew it by losing Kick Off coverage lane discipline to allow the TD. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...