Jump to content

is jonathan williams next? - update: now cut

ronnieroscoe

By ronnieroscoe
in The Stadium Wall Archives

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Posted Images

Doc Hall of Famer

Doc

Posted
Posted

Of course you do. None of us have to buy into every decision they make. That doesn't mean you can't hope for the best and we're talking about a backup RB who showed a great deal of improvement with the potential to be a starter in the future. I think many forget his pre-injury college career.

 

Again, I can't get excited over the backup RB position and I can't do anything to change things. And for all anyone knows, Banyard and Tolbert will do a fine job, just like Freddy, and then Karlos, and then Mike did.

 

I have steadfastly refused to say the #Bills are tanking. I may be revising my thought on this.

They won't have enough draft picks to fix this team with all the holes they are making.

 

...because they cut JWill? LOL!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CommonCents All Pro

CommonCents

Posted
Posted

 

Again, I can't get excited over the backup RB position and I can't do anything to change things. And for all anyone knows, Banyard and Tolbert will do a fine job, just like Freddy, and then Karlos, and then Mike did.

 

 

...because they cut JWill? LOL!

Because they let MIke G. Walk!?

Because they didn't resign Gilmore!?

Because they traded the always injured Sammy!?

Because they traded Darby who is coming off a down year!?

Because Boldin signed then retired!?

Because they kept Vlad!?

 

Each move by itself isn't an indication of a tank but all of those combined is getting harder and harder to make sense of.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
hondo in seattle All Pro

hondo in seattle

Posted
Posted

 

Last year is last year with him showing much improved quickness, decision making, and burst in camp and preseason games. Young and on his rookie deal for three more seasons including this one. It just does not add up especially when considering the age of those kept instead of him.

 

That was the narrative... Last year he was slowed by injury but this year he's going to have a breakout season. I just never bought that narrative.

 

JW's age doesn't matter if he's actually just-a-guy. Three more seasons as a 2nd/3rd stringer at a bargain rate on a rookie contract - not sure I see the immense appeal in that.

 

26CB ~ you're a guy I read carefully because you're a knowledgeable fan with an eye for talent. But all I saw was a JAG. If our coaches with their years of experience think the other backs will help the Bills more, then so be it and good luck to Jonathon in some other team's colors.

 

Joe Banyard beat out Jonathon Williams for a roster spot. We can either bemoan the loss of Williams or celebrate the accomplishment of the unheralded Banyard. I choose the latter. I just don't see that losing JW is going to hurt our W-L record in the slightest. Not this season, or any future season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Max Fischer Veteran

Max Fischer

Posted
Posted

 

Again, I can't get excited over the backup RB position and I can't do anything to change things. And for all anyone knows, Banyard and Tolbert will do a fine job, just like Freddy, and then Karlos, and then Mike did.

 

 

...because they cut JWill? LOL!

 

 

To quote one of the sports writer, folks are apologetic over a backup RB as if the Bills just cut Jim Brown, a player who may not get picked up by another team. No longer will I defend Bills fans as savvy and knowledgeable, the trolls have gone off the deep end . . .

Link to comment
Share on other sites
26CornerBlitz Hall of Famer

26CornerBlitz

Posted
Posted

 

That was the narrative... Last year he was slowed by injury but this year he's going to have a breakout season. I just never bought that narrative.

 

JW's age doesn't matter if he's actually just-a-guy. Three more seasons as a 2nd/3rd stringer at a bargain rate on a rookie contract - not sure I see the immense appeal in that.

 

26CB ~ you're a guy I read carefully because you're a knowledgeable fan with an eye for talent. But all I saw was a JAG. If our coaches with their years of experience think the other backs will help the Bills more, then so be it and good luck to Jonathon in some other team's colors.

 

Joe Banyard beat out Jonathon Williams for a roster spot. We can either bemoan the loss of Williams or celebrate the accomplishment of the unheralded Banyard. I choose the latter. I just don't see that losing JW is going to hurt our W-L record in the slightest. Not this season, or any future season.

 

We definitely see this one differently and it's all good. :thumbsup:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Max Fischer Veteran

Max Fischer

Posted
Posted

 

That was the narrative... Last year he was slowed by injury but this year he's going to have a breakout season. I just never bought that narrative.

 

JW's age doesn't matter if he's actually just-a-guy. Three more seasons as a 2nd/3rd stringer at a bargain rate on a rookie contract - not sure I see the immense appeal in that.

 

26CB ~ you're a guy I read carefully because you're a knowledgeable fan with an eye for talent. But all I saw was a JAG. If our coaches with their years of experience think the other backs will help the Bills more, then so be it and good luck to Jonathon in some other team's colors.

 

Joe Banyard beat out Jonathon Williams for a roster spot. We can either bemoan the loss of Williams or celebrate the accomplishment of the unheralded Banyard. I choose the latter. I just don't see that losing JW is going to hurt our W-L record in the slightest. Not this season, or any future season.

 

26 is going down with the ship no matter how much water it takes. Too many fans dig in on indefensible positions and bring down the entire website with their intransigence. Sad!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
26CornerBlitz Hall of Famer

26CornerBlitz

Posted
Posted

 

26 is going down with the ship no matter how much water it takes. Too many fans dig in on indefensible positions and bring down the entire website with their intransigence. Sad!

 

The only one taking on water is you with defenses of Vlad Ducasse and the invention of nonexistent issues with Jonathan Williams to support a poor personnel decision. Carry on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Max Fischer Veteran

Max Fischer

Posted
Posted

Hey have lost the locker room. Guarantied.

 

How would you possibly know that?

 

The only one taking on water is you with defenses of Vlad Ducasse and the invention of nonexistent issues with Jonathan Williams to support a poor personnel decision. Carry on.

 

I have never said a word about VD. You and I know nothing about what goes into the team's decision making. I readily admit that, while you fantasize that you are on the team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Doc Hall of Famer

Doc

Posted
Posted

Because they let MIke G. Walk!?

Because they didn't resign Gilmore!?

Because they traded the always injured Sammy!?

Because they traded Darby who is coming off a down year!?

Because Boldin signed then retired!?

Because they kept Vlad!?

 

Each move by itself isn't an indication of a tank but all of those combined is getting harder and harder to make sense of.

 

By prefacing Sammy with "always injured" and qualifying Darby with "who is coming off a down year," in lieu of MG also being a backup RB, Boldin having barely been here, and Vlad being kept but not necessarily as a starter, I'm not sure if you're being facetious or not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Peter All Pro

Peter

Posted
Posted (edited)

I have a feeling we are going to look back and wonder why it was we:

 

(1) cut Jonathan Williams to keep a 31 year old fullback;

 

(2) traded Reggie Ragland for basically nothing

 

(3) traded Darby and replaced him with a guy (in the Watkins trade) who is a back up and has one year left on his contract.

Edited by Peter
Link to comment
Share on other sites
stinky finger Veteran

stinky finger

Posted
Posted

I have a feeling we are going to look back and wonder why it was we:

 

(1) cut Jonathan Williams to keep a 31 year old fullback;

 

(2) traded Reggie Ragland for basically nothing

 

(3) traded Darby and replaced him with a guy (n the Watkins trade) who is a back up and has one year left on his contract.

You just did.

 

Should've given someone else a chance.

lol you guys sure are losing your **** over a 5th round RB who hasn't done jack squat on the field.

Beane baaaaaad

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Saint Doug Veteran

Saint Doug

Posted
Posted (edited)

 

Wouldn't a "tank" also mean cutting productive veterans for unproven young players?

No offense, but if you don't think every or any veteran on this team can't be had for the right price, then you're naive. There's likely just no takers. TT would command a 1st or a 2nd, but why would any team want him for that at this point? Dareus is untradeable due to his contract. Kyle Williams is old and would likely retire if traded. McCoy may yet get traded...stay tuned. Given Glenn's injury history, I'm sure they would love to unload him.

 

As for trading vets for youngsters, apparently that's not how it's done. The Sabres loaded up middle-aged vets, then jettisoned them after the tank years. You don't want young, impressionable players around while you're purposely losing. Bad for their development.

Edited by Saint Doug
Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...