Jump to content

Nate Peterman Love .. anyone vs. 2018 QB draft??


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

All I can say is the offense in the last 2 preseason games needs a lot of work.

 

Fair enough?

Definitley. But from the looks of things they are running a lot of plays out of the same sets. Asking Tyrod to stay in the pocket, etc. The more worrying thing is the OL. They are getting absolutely demolished.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is all nonsense. Preseason stats are less than meaningless. I care about stats when it's a real game with real planning and all the starters on the field.

You are right about stats but we are talking " Eye test" and one looks better than the other.

If the argument is against second team players than put Peterman in with the first string.

Edited by Buffalo Boy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I posted two images without comment. What do you think my opinion on these players are?

You actually didn't just post 2 pictures without comment. In the picture of Peterman you specifically mentioned that it was against 2nd and 3rd stringers followed by a "yikes". The Tyrod picture, of 2016, didn't need any comment because it was good. You are clearly trying to imply something whether you actually come out and say it or admit it.

 

If Tyrod's numbers against pressure for this pre-season aren't available then just say it. Otherwise it looks as though you're pushing an agenda.

Edited by Bangarang
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are right about stats but we are talking " Eye test" and one looks better than the other.

If the argument is against second team players than put Peterman in with the first string.

The eye test is useless in comparing QBs in preseason. Peterman plays with different players, against different players, even the play calls are different on both sides. To me the 2nd and 3rd defenses look a lot more vanilla than the defense Tyrod went against. That's not an indictment of Peterman, I like him a lot, but let's be realistic about what we're seeing. Peterman has developed well throughout training camp, he didn't look this good at the beginning. I'm in no hurry to rush his development by throwing him in the middle of a real game. At least give him half the season to sit on the bench and watch film, and then if things aren't going we'll see what he has.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The eye test is useless in comparing QBs in preseason. Peterman plays with different players, against different players, even the play calls are different on both sides. To me the 2nd and 3rd defenses look a lot more vanilla than the defense Tyrod went against. That's not an indictment of Peterman, I like him a lot, but let's be realistic about what we're seeing. Peterman has developed well throughout training camp, he didn't look this good at the beginning. I'm in no hurry to rush his development by throwing him in the middle of a real game. At least give him half the season to sit on the bench and watch film, and then if things aren't going we'll see what he has.

Ah, the voice of reason in the middle of an unseemly scrum. I would only add if Peterman is to be the backup he should get snaps with the first team O and against the first team D in case we need him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is all nonsense. Preseason stats are less than meaningless. I care about stats when it's a real game with real planning and all the starters on the field.

Of course, had we won the last 2 games by a combined score of 84 to 6, the usual Kool Aid Krowd would be talking about an undefeated season.

 

The realists would suggest that is insane as this is just the pre-season, and the Kool Aid Krowd would deride the realists asking if they have been watching the games.

 

That's how this place rolls.

 

:lol:

Edited by Fadingpain
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The eye test is useless in comparing QBs in preseason. Peterman plays with different players, against different players, even the play calls are different on both sides. To me the 2nd and 3rd defenses look a lot more vanilla than the defense Tyrod went against. That's not an indictment of Peterman, I like him a lot, but let's be realistic about what we're seeing. Peterman has developed well throughout training camp, he didn't look this good at the beginning. I'm in no hurry to rush his development by throwing him in the middle of a real game. At least give him half the season to sit on the bench and watch film, and then if things aren't going we'll see what he has.

 

...cannot agree more HD......Donohole threw Losman in LONG before he was ready, attempting to atone for giving up a ton to draft him......EJ also had a premature rocky start, again LONG before ready after the Kolb "Great Mat Attack (top 5 worst signing in Bflo history-guy's noodle was concussed beyond repair)............BUT...despite their starts, we will NEVER know if they may have developed to be top 10 or 15 QB's in a different environment...TT did have the better career start, sitting for 4 years as an understudy (too long or just right? again who knows).....vaild arguments on both sides as to whether TT's first two years starting in Bflo have been closer to "ideal" or a "long way from ideal (see other 12,483 threads and counting)"....injuries are NOT part of the argument because the other 31 deal with them regularly....BUT.....the coaching/OC/DC/playbook carousel certainly enters into it.....organizational instability throws any type of continuity and rhythm out the window.......so fairly, 2017 is a clean slate and his "make it or break it" year IMO..........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You actually didn't just post 2 pictures without comment. In the picture of Peterman you specifically mentioned that it was against 2nd and 3rd stringers followed by a "yikes". The Tyrod picture, of 2016, didn't need any comment because it was good. You are clearly trying to imply something whether you actually come out and say it or admit it.

 

If Tyrod's numbers against pressure for this pre-season aren't available then just say it. Otherwise it looks as though you're pushing an agenda.

You're right, I forgot I said Yikes, but I didn't really make any comment other than the obvious pressure was bad that anyone with half a brain would see. Edited by Chilly
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are right about stats but we are talking " Eye test" and one looks better than the other.

If the argument is against second team players than put Peterman in with the first string.

 

why?

 

he isn't the starter. they don't give reps with the ones to the back up?

 

now, although very doubtful, maybe to appease the fans they'll demote taylor and allow peter to start the last two games. if my memory serves me, the starters don't even take a snap the last preseason game so they better do it next game then.

 

 

peter is the back up, he wont be practicing with the ones and all this hype so far is based off practice.

 

 

honestly, I would be curious to see how he fares with the ones. I bet it wouldn't be as good but hey, you never know. at this point though, there are some real mesmerized fans getting all giddy about the 5th round pick but history has always been that the back up for the bills is the star of the team.

 

 

unless of course you're speaking of thigpen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The eye test is useless in comparing QBs in preseason. Peterman plays with different players, against different players, even the play calls are different on both sides. To me the 2nd and 3rd defenses look a lot more vanilla than the defense Tyrod went against. That's not an indictment of Peterman, I like him a lot, but let's be realistic about what we're seeing. Peterman has developed well throughout training camp, he didn't look this good at the beginning. I'm in no hurry to rush his development by throwing him in the middle of a real game. At least give him half the season to sit on the bench and watch film, and then if things aren't going we'll see what he has.

Exactly. Jeff Tuel passed the eye test in preseason.

Edited by Wayne Cubed
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The eye test is useless in comparing QBs in preseason. Peterman plays with different players, against different players, even the play calls are different on both sides. To me the 2nd and 3rd defenses look a lot more vanilla than the defense Tyrod went against. That's not an indictment of Peterman, I like him a lot, but let's be realistic about what we're seeing. Peterman has developed well throughout training camp, he didn't look this good at the beginning. I'm in no hurry to rush his development by throwing him in the middle of a real game. At least give him half the season to sit on the bench and watch film, and then if things aren't going we'll see what he has.

+1. He's not ready at this point and likely will not perform as well as Tyrod did when under pressure last season. I'm also not convinced Tyrod will as well either.

 

I think we took any chance these QBs had of performing decent when we traded away Sammy. I'm curious to see what Peterman will grow into, but it's a horrible proposition for his development to throw him in at this point. Pressure will destroy a career and he's not ready.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The eye test is useless in comparing QBs in preseason. Peterman plays with different players, against different players, even the play calls are different on both sides. To me the 2nd and 3rd defenses look a lot more vanilla than the defense Tyrod went against. That's not an indictment of Peterman, I like him a lot, but let's be realistic about what we're seeing. Peterman has developed well throughout training camp, he didn't look this good at the beginning. I'm in no hurry to rush his development by throwing him in the middle of a real game. At least give him half the season to sit on the bench and watch film, and then if things aren't going we'll see what he has.

TT throwing over the middle VS Peterman throwing over the middle.

Maybe Boldin should have broken his route in but it still looked like a chuck and hope the receiver helps me.

Petersen threw a perfect pass to O' Leary. A starter I presume O' Leary is?

In terms of giving him time to develope. I get it. But this term " Throwing him in" suggests that they are forcing him.

The D looks adequate and the run blocking is our strength.

Ball control and D are this years recipe regardless of who starts..... a good recipe for a rookie🤔

Edited by Buffalo Boy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He was playing against back ups in a vanilla system. He may be decent, but yesterday James Lofton on the Blitz made a good point that Dennison is forcing TT to stay in the pocket, focus on quick releases and working the middle. He did that pretty well. In week 1. He expects Dennison to have a ton of designed roll out plays which places pressure on opposing LB's especially if Shady is out side of him so he can pitch it, run it, or throw to Clay, Bolton, or Jones.

 

Too early to tell on TT. If TT sucks in the first four games, I'm fine with a change, but give him a chance while Peterson learns how to make adjustments, read shifts in defense and can call audibles.

 

He'll need at least 4-6 games to learn those things.

 

Bolton? No wonder we lost! We had Tyrod throwing to this guy:

 

michael-bolton-mullet.xlarge.jpg

Edited by ROCBillsBeliever
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...