Jump to content

Bills trade #10 for #27, a 3rd, and 2018 1st


Recommended Posts

That may be how you do it but it doesn't make any sense in real life. This isn't time value of money. For a team that's competing in 2017, yes, that matters. For a rebuilding team, you could argue that 2018 first round pick might be more valuable.

 

Everything is time value of money

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Watch out for the Bucs!

 

Man my analysis showed that Bucs have been drafting really well last 5 years and they finally made a turn up onfield last year. with all the pieces they got this summer, they are gonna be scary offensively.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That may be how you do it but it doesn't make any sense in real life. This isn't time value of money. For a team that's competing in 2017, yes, that matters. For a rebuilding team, you could argue that 2018 first round pick might be more valuable.

Omg, no! It is how it works. Like with the Watkins trade, when the Bills could have either traded their 1&2 or that years 1 and the next year's one to move up. I don't get how folks ITT are trying to value a next year's 1st as one for this year. Crazy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

lol at ANY fan who thinks they know what any QB will do in the NFL. It's absurd with only 30 seconds of thought. The NFL is worth BILLIONS. If you knew which QB's would be successful in any draft you would be filthy, filthy rich.

 

So, please. Just stop with the nonsense.

 

Imagine the bandwidth savings!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're doing it wrong. You need to discount the 2018 #27 by a round.

 

#10 - 1300

 

#27 - 680 (2017)

#91 - 136 (2017)

#27 - 310 (2018)

TOTAL - 1126

 

Bills should have gotten a 2018 2nd of 2018 3rd to balance.

 

 

We're sacrificing a little bit of value for more personnel. This team has a lot of holes to fill. There's also very little room for the Chiefs to improve, and a ton of room for them to drop which would only benefit us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Omg, no! It is how it works. Like with the Watkins trade, when the Bills could have either traded their 1&2 or that years 1 and the next year's one to move up. I don't get how folks ITT are trying to value a next year's 1st as one for this year. Crazy.

 

Admittedly I don't know a whole lot about the value chart, but why would the same pick in the same round next year be worth half the value of this years? Next year, would we say "Gee, I wish we used this 1st round pick last year, its worth half of these other 1st round picks"?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...