Deranged Rhino Posted March 12, 2017 Share Posted March 12, 2017 Kremlin spokesman: Russian ambassador met with advisers to Clinton campaign too http://thehill.com/policy/international/323582-kremlin-spokesman-russian-ambassador-met-with-advisers-to-clinton Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gatorbait Posted March 12, 2017 Share Posted March 12, 2017 The multiple number of current investigations will reveal if there was collusion or not. It could just be a lot of smoke but right now none of us truly know. If there is something it will be released drip by drip until the 2018 and 2020 elections. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 (edited) MCCARTHYISM UPDATE: “Rep. Keith Ellison (D., Minn.) claimed on Friday there was collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia, although he admitted he had no evidence to back his claims.” I think Keith Ellison is on the payroll of the Muslim Brotherhood and Hamas, though I admit I have no evidence to back my claims. But I think it needs to be investigated. Trump's Run of Dumb Luck (This time his wild accusation inadvertently prompted an Obama senior intelligence official to puncture a narrative that was consuming his presidency. Economists call this kind of thing a moral hazard. In politics we call it dumb luck.”) How quickly Washington forgets. It was only two weeks ago that the biggest story in the nation's capital was how President Donald Trump's aides were pressuring the FBI and allies in Congress to shoot down the stories whirling around about his associates' ties to Russia. That was before the president's Saturday-morning tweet storm. Trump accused his predecessor of illegally wiretapping Trump Tower during the election. The freakout over this unproven allegation is going into its sixth day. Barack Obama is apparently furious. Many observers have already noted that Trump likes to tweet outrageous things to distract from damaging news stories. One explanation for Trump's accusations about illegal wiretaps is that he was trying to change the subject from the Russia investigation. But that's only part of it. Trump's tweets, and his ignorance about how the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act works, have prompted Obama's last director of national intelligence, James Clapper, and others to publicly refute the stories about the Trump campaign's ties to Russia. Well what do you know? That's exactly what Trump wanted the FBI to do last month. . More at the link Edited March 13, 2017 by B-Man Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 Kremlin spokesman: Russian ambassador met with advisers to Clinton campaign too http://thehill.com/policy/international/323582-kremlin-spokesman-russian-ambassador-met-with-advisers-to-clinton Why doe EVERYONE forget this story? Hillary/Ukraine efforts to sabotage Trump campaign backfires Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azalin Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 Gremlins from the Kremlin... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 Why doe EVERYONE forget this story? Hillary/Ukraine efforts to sabotage Trump campaign backfires But that's okay, because it was in support of the correct candidate... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 Kremlin spokesman: Russian ambassador met with advisers to Clinton campaign too http://thehill.com/policy/international/323582-kremlin-spokesman-russian-ambassador-met-with-advisers-to-clinton Does Clinton have loans from Russian banks? Did Clinton change the party platform to a more favorable stance for the Russians? Did Clinton call for Russia to hack Trump's email? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 No. They got their checks directly deposited into the Clinton Foundation. Didn't have to change a thing on their weak platform. The deal for our Uranium was already done. Maybe if she obeyed the law she wouldn't have had a care in the world. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 http://www.politico.com/trump-russia-ties-scandal-guide/timeline-of-events The Russian government, at the behest of Russian President Vladimir Putin, waged a sustained influence operation in the United States in support of Donald Trump’s campaign for president. Major questions remain about the degree of interaction between Trump associates and Russian operatives. Here’s what we know so far based on news reports, public statements and the U.S. government’s unclassified report on Russian election interference. Timeline of events Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 Clintons got fed goldfish treats when they begged at the Kremlin? Say it ain't so, Joe!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 Clinton Campaign aids met with the Russian Ambassador multiple times during the election! Investigate! Special Prosecutor! Special Committees Convene! The Media is all over it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grinreaper Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 http://www.politico.com/trump-russia-ties-scandal-guide/timeline-of-events Timeline of events I didn't see Seth Rich's name on that timeline. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 I didn't see Seth Rich's name on that timeline. Putin loves you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 Putin loves you It's still amazing to me this has become the go-to retort on the left. We are in bizarro world. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 Putin loves you The 80's called, they want their foreign policy back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted March 17, 2017 Share Posted March 17, 2017 Flynn took in some big money from the Russians. President Trumps former national security adviser, Michael Flynn, received $56,250 in payments during the presidential race for work done for two Russian firms and Kremlin-backed news outlet RT, according to new documents obtained by a House Oversight panel. Flynn was fired from his White House post last month after misleading Vice President Pence about communications with Russia's ambassador to the U.S. Democrats on the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee are requesting an additional investigation into newly disclosed payments he received from Russia-based companies, sending a letter detailing the allegations to Trump and the leaders of the Pentagon and FBI. http://thehill.com/business-a-lobbying/324322-flynn-worked-for-multiple-russian-firms Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted March 17, 2017 Share Posted March 17, 2017 $56k is chump change. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted March 17, 2017 Share Posted March 17, 2017 $56k is chump change. Sure, especially next to the other money he took from Turkey. What else did he get? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PastaJoe Posted March 17, 2017 Share Posted March 17, 2017 $56k is chump change. I agree that Flynn is a chump, and it just exemplifies how bad a decision Trump made in selecting him as NSA. And if not for the public disclosure of his lying to Pence which embarrassed Trump into firing him, Flynn would still be the compromised NSA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
richstadiumowner Posted March 17, 2017 Share Posted March 17, 2017 "The more hysterical liberals become about Russia, the more your antennae should go up. Their selective misgivings with Russia are just like their selective alarm with (our ally) Chiang Kai-shek, leader of the nationalist Chinese government, and (our ally) Ngo Dinh Diem, president of South Vietnam. As explained in lavish detail in Treason: Liberal Treachery from the Cold War to the War on Terrorism, liberals instinctively lunge toward treason. They say Putin is a “thug” and a “bully” who kills journalists. Liberals never used to mind Russian leaders killing journalists. Nor millions of scientists, writers, Christians, Jews, kulaks, Ukrainians and the entire 1980 Soviet Olympic hockey team. Have you guys heard of the Evil Empire? Now Democrats are hypersensitive to a Russian leader’s flaws? Liberals were cool with the show trials, the alliance with Hitler, the gulags, the forced starvations, the shooting down of American planes and goose-stepping through Eastern Europe. But that was when the Russian leader was Joseph Stalin or Nikita Khrushchev — not the beast Putin! Back then, liberals were spying for Stalin (Julius Rosenberg’s code name: “Liberal”), the U.S. president was calling the bloodthirsty dictator “Uncle Joe,” and The New York Timeswas covering up Stalin’s infamous crimes. In the storied history of fake news, the Times’Walter Duranty won a Pulitzer Prize for his false reports denying the Ukrainian famine, in which more than 7 million people were deliberately starved to death. As far as the Times is concerned, those were Russia’s halcyon days!" More. http://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2017/03/15/ann-coulter-lets-make-russia-sister-country/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts