Jump to content

Trump and Russia


Recommended Posts

Just now, keepthefaith said:

 

She may but I think Liz will have a low ceiling and won't benefit from greater exposure in debates and other events. 

Low ceiling? A majority of women voters hate Trump. Warren could really tap into that support and ride it to the WH! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Low ceiling? A majority of women voters hate Trump. Warren could really tap into that support and ride it to the WH! 

 

We're talking about the Dem primary.  She has to win that before Trump detroys her and he would destroy her.  She comes across as a prudish whiny lightweight which is exactly what she is.   Dems might be more likely to go for the slutty angry Harris. 

Edited by keepthefaith
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, keepthefaith said:

 

We're talking about the Dem primary.  She has to win that before Trump detroys her and he would destroy her.  She comes across as a prudish whiny lightweight which is exactly what she is.   Dems might be more likely to go for the slutty angry Harris. 

Who knows? But with women being so decisively against Trump,  its hard to see him overcoming that. 

 

Oh and Harris is going to be our Attorney General leading the investigations ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, keepthefaith said:

 

She may but I think Liz will have a low ceiling and won't benefit from greater exposure in debates and other events. 

 

I think that Bernie has the best shot if Biden tanks. As you stated, Warren will not hold up to scrutiny when the debates start.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, KRC said:

 

I think that Bernie has the best shot if Biden tanks. As you stated, Warren will not hold up to scrutiny when the debates start.

 

not a single person with a brain and morals looks at her and sees anything but a liar who used fake minority status to get where she is in life

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Tiberius said:

So they actively supported Trump, like your article sys. 

 

More likely they hacked other Republicans to help Trump in the primaries, Marco Rubio was hated by Putin also for his pro-democracy stance. 

 

It still leaves the question unanswered, WHY DID PUTIN WANT TRUMP AS PRESIDENT? 

 

Sorry bout the caps 

 

Damn. Your posts have me liking the Russians more and more.  They hacked even the Republicans to get Trump elected??  Brilliant!!  And why did Putin want Trump elected?   He knew how much fun it was going to be watching all your head’s explode.  All hail the Putin Toad!!  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, row_33 said:

You've chosen to ignore content by Tiberius.

 

excellent point, hear hear, Madame Speaker!!

 

image.png.26f190da6a4e8ff32effeb302d6ebcf8.png

 

2 hours ago, row_33 said:

You've chosen to ignore content by Tiberius.

 

and a witty counterproposal, right rum played, Jeeves...

 

image.png.dc837714a777a591af5b2eedd849c319.png

 

what are you, twelve?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Tiberius said:

Hey, Mueller's probe established Putin wanted Trump as President. 

 

I just want to know why? You are just trying to muddy the waters with all this other stuff.

 

OK.  Let's just go with it, and say Putin 100% wanted Trump as president.

 

How is anyone supposed to know WHY, except Putin himself?

There are thousands of possible reasons WHY he would prefer Trump over Clinton.  If you choose to assume it was something dastardly and treasonous without even a shred of evidence, then I feel sorry for you.

 

We've had investigations by the FBI, the House of Reps, the Senate, and two-years with Mueller's Special Council into the Russia thing.  Now that the Democrats have control of Congress, they are digging into Trump's business, his family and anyone connected to his political campaign.  All of them are DESPERATELY tried to find SOMETHING.... ANYTHING that can be used as ammunition in getting him kicked out of office.  The most powerful people in the WORLD are searching under every rock to find a shred of dirt on this guy, and thus far have found absolutely NOTHING. 

 

If you hate Trump's beliefs and political stances, then fine.  But at some point, you have to acknowledge that he has done nothing wrong.  You accuse him of being a criminal, because you WANT him to be.  Not because there are facts to back it up.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Tiberius said:

Really? Were they? Or is that just a misinformation point? 

 

We know Putin wanted Trump as President, we are beyond that, I'm just asking why now. 

 

Why did Putin want this incompetent fool as our president? Was it to create chaos? Was Putin upset with green energy sending oil prices lower? Was it he just had Trump compromised and Trump is sending him classified info and Putin is using that to kill our CIA assets in Russia? 

 

 

I'm glad you are coming around and agreeing that natural gas is green energy. It's what allowed us to lead the world in reducing carbon emissions.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, McGee Return TD said:

 

 

Yup! 

 

You walk into the bear trap each time because you fail to think beyond your tds. If taking information from foreigners is illegal -- which is what Brennan is saying -- that means Hillary broke the law when she paid for information from British and Russian spies, it means Schiff and Warner broke the law when they breathlessly accepted "kompromat" from Ukrainian talk show hosts and Russian lawyers respectively ....

 

Trump set the media up on that answer -- and George and everyone else fell for it hook line and sinker. 

 

Trump did not accept any information from Russians -- he was open but did not accept. Meanwhile the other side not only accepted it but paid for it and used it to try to influence the election. 

 

Oops. 

  • Like (+1) 4
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

You walk into the bear trap each time because you fail to think beyond your tds. If taking information from foreigners is illegal -- which is what Brennan is saying -- that means Hillary broke the law when she paid for information from British and Russian spies, it means Schiff and Warner broke the law when they breathlessly accepted "kompromat" from Ukrainian talk show hosts and Russian lawyers respectively ....

 

Trump set the media up on that answer -- and George and everyone else fell for it hook line and sinker. 

 

Trump did not accept any information from Russians -- he was open but did not accept. Meanwhile the other side not only accepted it but paid for it and used it to try to influence the election. 

 

Oops. 

Ah, DR has popped his head up for a minute. You're supposed to be concentrating on Mai Tai's and breasts.

 

See the source image

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, B-Man said:

 

 

 

 

 

 

.

I love wikkileaks! 

 

Trump was trying to build a hotel in Russia, meeting with Russians, had a campaign manager corruptly tied to Russia and many, many other contacts, defends Putin, meets secretly with Putin and his National Security Advisor was compromised by the Russians. 

 

But, ya, aside from that, Hillary can find Russia on a map, so she is guilty. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

I love wikkileaks! 

 

Trump was trying to build a hotel in Russia, meeting with Russians, had a campaign manager corruptly tied to Russia and many, many other contacts, defends Putin, meets secretly with Putin and his National Security Advisor was compromised by the Russians. 

 

But, ya, aside from that, Hillary can find Russia on a map, so she is guilty. 

 

 

All you do is twist things and lie. Trump has treated Russia much more harshly than any of his recent predecessors.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, 3rdnlng said:

All you do is twist things and lie. Trump has treated Russia much more harshly than any of his recent predecessors.

 

Nah, man. It's all part of Putin's plan! Don't you see?

 

Step 1: Increase sanctions on Russia

Step 2: ???

Step 3: Armata tanks breaking down on Pennsylvania Avenue!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, 3rdnlng said:

All you do is twist things and lie. Trump has treated Russia much more harshly than any of his recent predecessors.

That's just a stupid, made up, false and ridiculous claim. 

 

Putin helped Trump win. Why do you think he did that? 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/13/2019 at 4:36 AM, Deranged Rhino said:

You walk into the bear trap each time because you fail to think beyond your tds. If taking information from foreigners is illegal -- which is what Brennan is saying -- that means Hillary broke the law when she paid for information from British and Russian spies, it means Schiff and Warner broke the law when they breathlessly accepted "kompromat" from Ukrainian talk show hosts and Russian lawyers respectively ....

 

Trump set the media up on that answer -- and George and everyone else fell for it hook line and sinker. 

 

Trump did not accept any information from Russians -- he was open but did not accept. Meanwhile the other side not only accepted it but paid for it and used it to try to influence the election. 

 

Oops. 

 

Trump haters think he's a total buffoon, and on the surface his comments do sound pretty stupid.

I mean.... He is finally cleared of Russian collusion, and then tells everyone that he would be willing to accept dirt from a foreign country. 

 

But Trump is calculating on everything he does and says.

 

At the end of the day, the Mueller report shows he actually DID NOT accept dirt from Russia during his 2016 campaign.  And when it comes down to it, I'm sure Trump wouldn't be foolish enough to do it during his 2020 campaign.  However... By making these comments, he is getting the Democrats and the National Media into a total uproar.  And it's happening just as the Attorney General is bearing down on the Steele Dossier, Adam Schiff, Hillary Clinton and the origins of the Russia investigation.

 

It's very likely that Trump is setting everyone up.  All this hysteria about a campaign accepting information from a foreign power, just before the Attorney General goes before the public and details everything that Clinton's campaign was up to in 2016.

 

 

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...