Deranged Rhino Posted April 7, 2018 Author Share Posted April 7, 2018 On 4/5/2018 at 1:30 PM, GG said: I didn't know Zuck's troubles in getting a date in Harvard were foisted by the CIA http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3747202/Paul-Ceglia-supposed-Facebook-founder-disappeared-2015-says-s-running-CIA-want-kill-knowledge-involved-social-media-site.html Much more to come. The game is afoot, big month ahead. On 4/6/2018 at 11:53 AM, GaryPinC said: At the time, the goal was to get Iran to halt centrifugal enrichment of its own uranium. Obama's plan was to simply provide them with all the reactor grade uranium they needed while also drawing down Iran's stockpile. Gary... this is nonsense. Respectfully. That's like saying the plan to stop a mass shooter from reloading his weapon is to provide him with a belt feeder and unlimited rounds. The plan was to help the Iranian government work around sanctions. That's not something one does for an enemy. That's something one does for an ally. * Just like calling off DHS, FBI, and NSA from stopping Hezbollah from running guns, drugs, and humans in and out of the United States (see Operation Cassandra) was done to assuage the Mullahs. * Just like exposing the US's role in Stuxnet (and the capabilities of the cyber toolkit) to the NYT through your favorite general was done to help the Mullahs. * Just like paying out over $2B in cash and sanction relief in unmarked, untraceable Euros boarded onto cargo aircraft which do not all land in Tehran. * Just like abusing the spying tools of the NSA and USIC to harass, blackmail, and extort AMERICAN reporters who dare to publish unfriendly reports on the Iranian deal. Obama's Iranian plan had nothing to do with preventing the Mullahs from getting a nuclear weapon and everything to do with helping them maintain power. Aiding and abetting Hezbollah and the Mullahs is the legacy of Obama's Iranian foreign policy. Ask yourself why he was willing to risk so much to help the largest terrorist funding organization in the world... Truth is going to be hard for some to see. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted April 7, 2018 Author Share Posted April 7, 2018 ******************************** Big news being under reported: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-backpage-justice/sex-ads-website-backpage-shut-down-by-u-s-authorities-idUSKCN1HD2QP The war is real. It's hot. Casualties are occurring on all sides. Trafficking = the real border issue and why some in the government are so desperate to keep the border open and flowing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted April 7, 2018 Share Posted April 7, 2018 25 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: ******************************** Big news being under reported: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-backpage-justice/sex-ads-website-backpage-shut-down-by-u-s-authorities-idUSKCN1HD2QP The war is real. It's hot. Casualties are occurring on all sides. Trafficking = the real border issue and why some in the government are so desperate to keep the border open and flowing. so, i know a little bit about how trafficing works. the laymen never sees it. backpage was never about the sex ads. it was about the auto ads and other such things. a 1979 nissan nova, 4 cylinder for example would describe the "item" being sold. the year would be the age, the manufacturer describes the race, model can be looks, etc. that was just one of the ways, but backpage was never good for ads. craigslist was more for that, specifically setting up for group sex, etc. craigslist has removed the dating part of their site, as well. what could be next is Tinder, Grindr, others. It will be interesting. it is actually a god damn shame that liberties are being taken because otthers actions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted April 7, 2018 Author Share Posted April 7, 2018 Coded language is how it's done in plain site. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted April 7, 2018 Share Posted April 7, 2018 3 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Coded language is how it's done in plain site. LA Grant has been speaking in code for years. EII and LAG are among the covert agents here using this forum to communicate espionage plans. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taro T Posted April 7, 2018 Share Posted April 7, 2018 54 minutes ago, Boyst62 said: LA Grant has been speaking in code for years. EII and LAG are among the covert agents here using this forum to communicate espionage plans. Not sure about that, but it does explain Gator speaking Potatohead all these years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snafu Posted April 7, 2018 Share Posted April 7, 2018 28 minutes ago, Boyst62 said: LA Grant has been speaking in code for years. EII and LAG are among the covert agents here using this forum to communicate espionage plans. Row-33 does it in Canadien. Needs to be translated and then decoded. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TPS Posted April 9, 2018 Share Posted April 9, 2018 Hey DR, looks like Assad has been set up again. There's no way he uses CW when he's almost won the war. Right when Bolton steps in too... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted April 9, 2018 Author Share Posted April 9, 2018 38 minutes ago, TPS said: Hey DR, looks like Assad has been set up again. There's no way he uses CW when he's almost won the war. Right when Bolton steps in too... On 4/8/2018 at 1:56 PM, Deranged Rhino said: Track the sequence of events and REALLY think about the logic of attacking now: First: Trump announces the US is going to pull out of Syria last week, Result: The media spins it as helping Putin and Assad as well as ISIS and Hezbollah (both of whom are no longer in Syria in a serious way btw)... crying out for more perma-war (that benefits whom exactly? Not Russia, not Assad, not Iran... but whom?). Now: Less than a week later - there's a chemical attack "by Assad" (or Putin depending on your news source) which will accomplish nothing more than public outcry for the US to stay in Syria by both sides of the political aisle. Result: The same media is using this as cause to stay in Syria and escalate the conflict. HMMM... Put yourself in Putin or Assad's shoes. What sense does launching a chemical attack NOW make? It doesn't gain territory, all it does is give the US an excuse to stay in the region. The media made it clear for a week how pulling out benefits Putin and Assad and the Mullahs... so why would any of those elements risk forcing the US to course correct? Especially after Trump already responded with Tomahawks to the last chemical attack? IT DOESN'T MAKE SENSE - not because the enemy is stupid or impatient. They're neither. It doesn't make sense because the origin of the chemical attack comes from those who wish us to STAY in Syria. Those who wish us to stay long enough to START AN ACTUAL SHOOTING WAR WITH RUSSIA, IRAN, AND ASSAD. Who are the forces with that goal? It's not a nation state in the traditional sense. It's the elements within the IC (CIA) who have been pushing that agenda since 2014. The ones who backed the other candidate. The ones who have spent the past 12+ months being flushed from State and Langley. The ones who backed bin Talal. The ones who are LOSING. Think this through without partisanship. Do your own math and I guarantee you'll come to the same answer. This is a move devoid of logic unless the logic the media is trying to give is a lie.The strategy the MSM is pushing makes zero sense from Putin's, Assad's, or the Mullah's perspective. It makes no sense from ISIS or Hezbollah's perspective either. The only people who benefit from a chemical attack now are the ones who wish the US to stay in the region. Those enemies are DOMESTIC, folks. Don't be fooled again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted April 10, 2018 Author Share Posted April 10, 2018 Debated doing this... but I got some time to kill: Notice anything rage inducing in this picture? A picture they thought no one would ever see... Free to whoever gets it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted April 10, 2018 Share Posted April 10, 2018 10 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Debated doing this... but I got some time to kill: Notice anything rage inducing in this picture? A picture they thought no one would ever see... Free to whoever gets it. What the hell kind of Senator carries his own bag? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted April 10, 2018 Author Share Posted April 10, 2018 Just now, Koko78 said: What the hell kind of Senator carries his own bag? That gets one for the laugh Look closer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted April 10, 2018 Share Posted April 10, 2018 20 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Debated doing this... but I got some time to kill: Notice anything rage inducing in this picture? A picture they thought no one would ever see... Free to whoever gets it. I'm curious as to why there's a chemical weapons attack in Syria after every time John McCain travels there and meets with Mouaz Moustaffa. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted April 10, 2018 Author Share Posted April 10, 2018 Just now, TakeYouToTasker said: I'm curious as to why there's a chemical weapons attack in Syria after every time John McCain travels there and meets with Mouaz Moustaffa. Here's a hint as to my question above - and ties in to your question: This is why you don't go to war based on videos or pictures alone: https://streamable.com/ysxpb Notice anything? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted April 10, 2018 Share Posted April 10, 2018 10 minutes ago, TakeYouToTasker said: I'm curious as to why there's a chemical weapons attack in Syria after every time John McCain travels there and meets with Mouaz Moustaffa. Because he told them the US won't do anything about it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted April 10, 2018 Author Share Posted April 10, 2018 Just now, row_33 said: Because he told them the US won't do anything about it? Look closer at the picture posted above. Then reconsider your response. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warren Zevon Posted April 10, 2018 Share Posted April 10, 2018 37 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Debated doing this... but I got some time to kill: Notice anything rage inducing in this picture? A picture they thought no one would ever see... Free to whoever gets it. A picture they thought no one would ever see - except for the fact it's a Reuter's handout photo from 2013 that many people have seen before and will see in the future. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted April 10, 2018 Author Share Posted April 10, 2018 That's not the answer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warren Zevon Posted April 10, 2018 Share Posted April 10, 2018 (edited) https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Middle-East/2013/0529/McCain-visit-end-of-arms-embargo-signal-that-West-won-t-let-Syrian-rebels-sink May 29, 2013 to be exact* Edited April 10, 2018 by garybusey Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted April 10, 2018 Author Share Posted April 10, 2018 That's not the answer. What's wrong with the picture? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts