Jump to content

The Deep State War Heats Up :ph34r:


Recommended Posts

31 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

You know how you get more Trump? 

Things like this:

https://sports.yahoo.com/kevin-mchales-presence-donald-trumps-minnesota-rally-causes-nba-stir-155440726.html

 

Prog-fascists posing as liberals will not be happy until there's a shooting war in the streets. 

 

Interesting take contained in the article that a Republicans shouldn't be able to work because they're Republicans.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

 

But easily remedied.  The constitutional objection boils down to having a single director that is effectively not supervised and does not report to elected officials - i.e. is in no way answerable to The People.  That's basically fixed by saying "Okay...the President can fire the CFPB director."

 

Interesting note to this decision, too...the defendants got destroyed.  The constitutional issue is just about the only one they won - the court's ruling amounts to "Yeah, you are guilty of every violation you were accused of.  Too bad for the CFPB that they can't enforce them."  But too bad for the defendants that the lion's share of the violations were brought by the NY AG.  :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Deranged Rhino said:

Click for the whole thread. 

 

 

FTA:

 

The Obama IRS scandal is bipartisan – McCain and Democrats who wanted to regulate political speech lost at the Supreme Court, so they sought to use the IRS to harass innocent Americans,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “The Obama IRS scandal is not over – as Judicial Watch continues to uncover smoking gun documents that raise questions about how the Obama administration weaponized the IRS, the FEC, FBI, and DOJ to target the First Amendment rights of Americans.”

 

I post a lot of articles..........................this one really has me angry.

 

 

.

 

 

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

FTA:

 

The Obama IRS scandal is bipartisan – McCain and Democrats who wanted to regulate political speech lost at the Supreme Court, so they sought to use the IRS to harass innocent Americans,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “The Obama IRS scandal is not over – as Judicial Watch continues to uncover smoking gun documents that raise questions about how the Obama administration weaponized the IRS, the FEC, FBI, and DOJ to target the First Amendment rights of Americans.”

 

I post a lot of articles..........................this one really has me angry.

 

 

.

 

 

 

McCain was at least looking to enforce a law he believed in...which was found unconstitutional and hence not enforceable.  Still, he was acting from some sort of principle, however misguided and egotistical.

 

Not so Obama Administration.  McCain wanted to silence everyone.  The Obama administration, just their political opponents.  I can forgive stupid arrogance like McCain's.  But not fascist arrogance like Obama's.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

DID THE FBI FRAME FLYNN?

The criminal case against Gen. Michael Flynn for lying to FBI agents was incredibly weak. At the time, I assumed that the charges against him were based on an audio tape or court reporter’s transcript of his interview. I wrote that the transcript should be made public so that we can all judge whether anything he said was actually untrue. While Flynn ultimately pled guilty to a single count of lying to a federal investigator, he has also said publicly that he pled to that single charge because the criminal investigation was rapidly bankrupting him.

 

In fact, there is no verbatim record of what Flynn said to the agents who interviewed him. Consistent with normal FBI practice, as I understand it, there is no recording or transcript. Rather, the agents who conducted the interrogation summarized what Flynn said in a form FD-302. Is this summary of what Flynn (or any other witness) said accurate? Who knows? Are nuances lost? Undoubtedly. Is much of what the witness said, that may have mitigated the claim that something he said was false, omitted? Of course.

 

In my opinion, the likelihood of getting a criminal conviction of General Flynn on the basis of a Form 302 was vanishingly small. If the government can’t prove what Flynn said–exactly–there is no way they can convict him of what amounts to perjury. So I find Flynn’s statement that he didn’t do anything wrong, but pled guilty to a single count to preserve what little net worth he has left, to be credible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, B-Man said:

DID THE FBI FRAME FLYNN?

The criminal case against Gen. Michael Flynn for lying to FBI agents was incredibly weak. At the time, I assumed that the charges against him were based on an audio tape or court reporter’s transcript of his interview. I wrote that the transcript should be made public so that we can all judge whether anything he said was actually untrue. While Flynn ultimately pled guilty to a single count of lying to a federal investigator, he has also said publicly that he pled to that single charge because the criminal investigation was rapidly bankrupting him.

 

In fact, there is no verbatim record of what Flynn said to the agents who interviewed him. Consistent with normal FBI practice, as I understand it, there is no recording or transcript. Rather, the agents who conducted the interrogation summarized what Flynn said in a form FD-302. Is this summary of what Flynn (or any other witness) said accurate? Who knows? Are nuances lost? Undoubtedly. Is much of what the witness said, that may have mitigated the claim that something he said was false, omitted? Of course.

 

In my opinion, the likelihood of getting a criminal conviction of General Flynn on the basis of a Form 302 was vanishingly small. If the government can’t prove what Flynn said–exactly–there is no way they can convict him of what amounts to perjury. So I find Flynn’s statement that he didn’t do anything wrong, but pled guilty to a single count to preserve what little net worth he has left, to be credible.

I think I mentioned somewhere that it was probably a (illegal) perjury trap, which is why I said trump would be an idiot to testify. Maybe once they clean the swamp out...

 

while I may not like Trump and many of his policies, I am happy to see the administration expose the corrupt nature of our system, at least part of it. I have to disagree with how many characterize it as "the left" or liberals; the corruption knows no party bounds. As I mentioned to joe6pack, Bernie is the left, and they were also the victims of hrc and the dnc center. 

 

 

Edited by TPS
  • Like (+1) 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, TPS said:

I think I mentioned somewhere that it was probably a (illegal) perjury trap, which is why I said trump would be an idiot to testify. Maybe once they clean the swamp out...

 

while I may not like Trump and many of his policies, I am happy to see the administration expose the corrupt nature of our system, at least part of it. I have to disagree with how many characterize it as "the left" or liberals; the corruption knows no party bounds. As I mentioned to joe6pack, Bernie is the left, and they were also the victims of hrs and the dnc center. 

 

 

Well summarized.

 

It's not a left vs. right issue.  It's an issue of entrenchment, and the merger of polity and fiefdom. 

 

Power consolidates, and then enriches and protects itself.

 

These people attend the same schools, are members of the same societies, travel in the same social circles.  They golf and dine together.  Much of the traditional pre-Trump divide was/is kabuki theater intended to fracture the country with manufactured outrage on both sides in order to build permanent baronies.

 

As Carlin once said:  "It's a big club, and you ain't in it."

Edited by TakeYouToTasker
  • Like (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LaDexter said:

 

 

Censorship, one of Zionism's core "values..."

 

Does anyone remember if I've ever been called a Zionist before?  I know I've been called a Nazi, war criminal, communist, Democrat, Republican, Klansman, alt-right, white supremacist, gender-queer midget.  But I don't ever recall "Zionist."

  • Haha (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LaDexter said:

Censorship, one of Zionism's core "values..."

 

You moron, no one is censoring you.  You're being asked to keep your dopey bull **** to a single thread, in line with what the TOS for the website asks.  The board owner thinks it better if we can have single threads about specific things, rather than having dozens of threads about nothing in particular, which make conversation nearly impossible.

 

Please try to limit your anti-Semetic and disjointed rambling to your one thread dedicated to it.

 

Oh, and...

 

See the source image

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LaDexter said:

Censorship, one of Zionism's core "values..."

(not an endorsement)

 

Just keeping track of your stated beliefs to date:

 

1. The Earth is flat. 

2. Zionists control the world.

 

Follow up Questions: 

 

A. Bible - fact or fiction? 

B. Space - real or fake? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

Does anyone remember if I've ever been called a Zionist before?  I know I've been called a Nazi, war criminal, communist, Democrat, Republican, Klansman, alt-right, white supremacist, gender-queer midget.  But I don't ever recall "Zionist."

Don’t forget idiot. ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

But I don't ever recall "Zionist."

 

 

 

Every major message board in the US has a Mossad linked Zionist who immediately goes after 911 truth - here, that is you...

 

Would you like to make a full statement to the FBI about whether or not you

 

1. are Jewish

2. speak Hebrew

3. invested in defense stocks in 2001

4. don't believe building 7 was a controlled demolition

 

 

Of course not, since W and O no longer have the likes of Comey in charge...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

Does anyone remember if I've ever been called a Zionist before?  I know I've been called a Nazi, war criminal, communist, Democrat, Republican, Klansman, alt-right, white supremacist, gender-queer midget.  But I don't ever recall "Zionist."

 

You must be getting old if you forgot Pedantic Supercilious Anal Orifice

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

Follow up Questions: 

 

A. Bible - fact or fiction? 

B. Space - real or fake? 

 

A.) Which version?

 

B.) Totally fake. Do you not remember the episode of ST:TNG where Olivia D'abo was using her Q powers to find Q on the hull of the ship? She was not killed by the supposed vacuum that the astrological-industrial complex would have you believe exists. Fake news.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's see... there are only 14 million Jews in the world, and of those about 5 million live in Israel, and 7 million live in the US.

 

I'd have to guess that there are many magnitudes more message boards than Jews in the world.

 

This is because message boards are easy to create, and the creation of Jews requires months of Satanic ritual, the spinning of straw into gold, and the more well known 5 years of inter-egg gestation before they are finally hatched.

 

So... what's the math on the percentage of total Jews assigned by the Mossad to message board monitoring?  Do they each get like 6?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, TakeYouToTasker said:

there are only 14 million Jews in the world,

 

 

The problem, of course, is that so many who are Jewish lie about being Jewish....

 

Rupert Murdoch is a "Catholic" so he isn't in your numbers, right??

 

LOL!!!

 

A few others...

 

https://www.google.com/search?q=gaddafi+jewish&rlz=1C1VFKB_enUS779US779&oq=gaddafi+jewish&aqs=chrome..69i57.4143j0j8&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&safe=active&ssui=on

 

https://www.google.com/search?rlz=1C1VFKB_enUS779US779&ei=XiotW7qLMM-6zwLwxLHYAw&q=saudi+royal+family+jewish&oq=saudi+royal+family+jewish&gs_l=psy-ab.3..0l3.14306.21279.0.21728.26.22.4.0.0.0.87.1323.22.22.0....0...1.1.64.psy-ab..0.19.1040...0i7i30k1j0i67k1j0i7i10i30k1j0i20i263k1j0i8i7i30k1j0i13k1.0.DylJPSAjJyg&safe=active&ssui=on

 

 

 

That is why some in history went to great lengths to properly identify those stealing, lying, murdering, and false flagging....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, LaDexter said:

 

 

 

Every major message board in the US has a Mossad linked Zionist who immediately goes after 911 truth - here, that is you...

 

Would you like to make a full statement to the FBI about whether or not you

 

1. are Jewish

2. speak Hebrew

3. invested in defense stocks in 2001

4. don't believe building 7 was a controlled demolition

 

 

Of course not, since W and O no longer have the likes of Comey in charge...

 

!@#$ing seriously???  You think the FBI give a **** what my answers are to those questions?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LaDexter said:

 

 

 

Under W and O, no, truth about 911 was not allowed.

 

Trump may end up being different....

 

Okay...what do you think the FBI will do with people who are Jewish, speak Hebrew, held shares in Lockheed in 2001, and think WTC 7 collapsed on its own?  Which of those is actually against the law?

 

That isn't even normal Truther-level lunacy.  You're taking lunacy to a completely different level.  Tibs is never getting his beer back.

  • Haha (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So you are Jewish, you do speak Hebrew, you did own defense stocks, and you spend half of your time here lying about 911 and insulting/attacking those who tell the truth....

 

ACCOMPLICE TO TREASON

 

that sounds about right...

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

(Dis)information comes in all forms and types. 

 

Note he never responded to the comment that he is simply spouting COINTEL programming. He's a flat earthier too, a theory created to sow division and distrust in the alternative media and "truther" community. 

 

If hes a real account (doubtful) he either is just an antisemitic POS who latched onto disinformation as a crutch for his views, or he's intentionally spreading disinfo in a thread loaded with real information and evidence to distract. 

 

Money's on the former. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DC Tom said:

 

Does anyone remember if I've ever been called a Zionist before?  I know I've been called a Nazi, war criminal, communist, Democrat, Republican, Klansman, alt-right, white supremacist, gender-queer midget.  But I don't ever recall "Zionist."

You forgot Viet Kong mother of 13 and eager catcher.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

(Dis)information comes in all forms and types. 

 

Note he never responded to the comment that he is simply spouting COINTEL programming. He's a flat earthier too, a theory created to sow division and distrust in the alternative media and "truther" community. 

 

If hes a real account (doubtful) he either is just an antisemitic POS who latched onto disinformation as a crutch for his views, or he's intentionally spreading disinfo in a thread loaded with real information and evidence to distract. 

 

Money's on the former. 

He's a former poster named "GEORGE" who was banned about 8 years ago. He had a "manly" avatar cartoon figure and spouted the same anti-Semitic trash. The "tells" are there.

2 minutes ago, peace out said:

 

He's also a PE. There's plenty of evidence - just need to search someone's old posts!

Get your players straight, you ignorant little twit.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...