Jump to content

Trump's leadership team


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Steve Bannon for chief strategist.

 

I had to get to page six of Google results before I found a story that didn't basically describe him as Treuer Heinrich.

 

http://www.smh.com.au/world/us-election/who-is-donald-trumps-trusted-adviser-steve-bannon-ex-breitbart-news-chairman-20161111-gsnsnf.htm

 

:lol:

 

 

 

 

 

From the Trump thread............

 

Myron Ebell, who will lead Trump’s EPA transition team. The headline says it all: “Trump Picks Top Climate Skeptic to Lead EPA Transition.”

 

Rumor: Kelly Ayotte for defense secretary

 

 

Linda McMahon Considered for Secretary of Commerce: Sources

http://www.nbcconnecticut.com/news/local/Linda-McMahon-Considered-for-Secretary-of-Commerce-Sources-401008686.html

Edited by B-Man
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Steve Bannon for chief strategist.

 

I had to get to page six of Google results before I found a story that didn't basically describe him as Treuer Heinrich.

 

http://www.smh.com.au/world/us-election/who-is-donald-trumps-trusted-adviser-steve-bannon-ex-breitbart-news-chairman-20161111-gsnsnf.html

If you've met B-man, you've met Bannon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Steve Bannon for chief strategist.

 

I had to get to page six of Google results before I found a story that didn't basically describe him as Treuer Heinrich.

 

http://www.smh.com.au/world/us-election/who-is-donald-trumps-trusted-adviser-steve-bannon-ex-breitbart-news-chairman-20161111-gsnsnf.html

Steve Bannon sucks.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Donald Trump Is Picking His Cabinet: Here's a Short List ...

www.nytimes.

With the exceptions of Bannon and Palin who are both WTF names, most of that list (of the names more familiar to me), look palatable.

 

 

I'm certain Mr. Trump will be thrilled to hear of your approval.

 

With the exceptions of Bannon and Palin who are both WTF names, most of that list (of the names more familiar to me), look palatable.

 

I'd like to add Joe Arpaio to the "kook" list.

I didn't see Sheriff Joe on the list of possible Trump appointments. Is this just a fraidy-skeered reaction on your part? Need a hug?

On optics alone too many old white men. Fiorina should be considered for Commerce or Labor.

That's a salient criticism.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't see Sheriff Joe on the list of possible Trump appointments. Is this just a fraidy-skeered reaction on your part? Need a hug?

The link has Arpaio as a possible Homeland Security Secretary.

 

No, I don't need a hug. At least not from any of you nutcakes here at Redass Headquarters.

Edited by Cugalabanza
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah. That is a deeply disturbing pick. The rest currently under discussion are par for the course, really. But Bannon is not someone I want my president aligned with. Especially a president without a firm moral compass.

 

Well said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, Bannon isn't a good choice. But he helped save Trump's campaign. Hopefully he doesn't have much sway and it's just a job title.

 

He'll probably not last long. The anti-Jew stories are already coming out.

 

He's a skinhead like Ozy, has admitted that Brietbart is the site for all things Alt-Right, and if the press is eager to attack Trump right out of the gate, he's the guy to go after.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, Bannon isn't a good choice. But he helped save Trump's campaign. Hopefully he doesn't have much sway and it's just a job title.

 

Bannon's aiming to be Trump's Karl Rove. Trump is thin-skinned and maybe the backlash on that choice will get him to minimize his role.

 

He'll probably not last long. The anti-Jew stories are already coming out.

 

He's a skinhead like Ozy, has admitted that Brietbart is the site for all things Alt-Right, and if the press is eager to attack Trump right out of the gate, he's the guy to go after.

 

Bannon is an unmitigated disaster and should be nowhere near the seat of power in the US.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Story coming out of WSJ today is that Trump didn't realize the duties of the POTUS until his meeting with Obama, and that Obama will be more hands on than past Presidents have been during the transition. Also Trump's team didn't realize they'd have to be hiring all new White House staff.

 

How did we get here?

Edited by Dorkington
Link to comment
Share on other sites

With the exceptions of Bannon and Palin who are both WTF names, most of that list (of the names more familiar to me), look palatable.

 

I'd like to add Joe Arpaio to the "kook" list.

 

I wouldn't necessarily consider Arpaio a kook...just someone who's not qualified for anything above "podunk Sheriff."

 

Likewise, Palin...DOI might be something she's actually qualified for, given her governorship of AK and resultant experience with a good many DOI issues. You may not agree with the idea - I'm not sure I do - but it's not "kooky." (Not like something like "Secretary of the Treasury Sarah Palin" would be.)

 

I'd like to add Gingrich to the "kook" list, however.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Story coming out of WSJ today is that Trump didn't realize the duties of the POTUS until his meeting with Obama, and that Obama will be more hands on than past Presidents have been during the transition. Also Trump's team didn't realize they'd have to be hiring all new White House staff.

 

How did we get here?

 

Well, for starters, we got here because Obama waited until now to do something truly bipartisan... :doh:

 

This could be a good thing...it could put more of the burden back on to Congress where it belongs. No, I don't necessarily believe that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I wouldn't necessarily consider Arpaio a kook...just someone who's not qualified for anything above "podunk Sheriff."

 

Likewise, Palin...DOI might be something she's actually qualified for, given her governorship of AK and resultant experience with a good many DOI issues. You may not agree with the idea - I'm not sure I do - but it's not "kooky." (Not like something like "Secretary of the Treasury Sarah Palin" would be.)

 

I'd like to add Gingrich to the "kook" list, however.

 

The day DC Tom defended Sarah Palin's qualifications to be a presidential cabinet member.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good grief.

 

Milo would be a worse choice than Bannon...

 

Milo would be an awesome choice. His mere existence would piss off everybody.

 

Not "good" awesome, obviously...but holy Hell, that would be something to behold.

 

The day DC Tom defended Sarah Palin's qualifications to be a presidential cabinet member.

 

The day DC Tom pointed out that there might be one cabinet position she's not unqualified for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...