Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
55 minutes ago, billsfan1959 said:

 

I'm sure he does. Too bad it doesn't include helping black communities, as nobody he has supported has done so.

 


I would think James Clyborn knows what’s best for black and brown people. He’s done a ton for civil rights. 

50 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

The fact that he has been a democrat congressman for 27 years, is House Majority Whip, probably affected his choice.

 

I would venture to guess if Senator Tim Scott was running against Biden, Clyburn would still vote for Biden.

 

For a reason.

 

 

 

 

 

.


Out of all the terrific democratic candidates Clyborn chose Biden. 

Posted
Just now, JetsFan20 said:


I would think James Clyborn knows what’s best for black and brown people. He’s done a ton for civil rights. 

 

Link?

Posted
5 minutes ago, JetsFan20 said:


Out of all the terrific democratic candidates Clyborn chose Biden. 

 

 

Biden is the nominee, he can choose no other

 

He is also the establishment candidate, so Clyburn was again obligated to pick Biden.

 

AND again, he would support Biden over terrific candidate Tim Scott, if he had to also.

 

 

 

Posted
5 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

Biden is the nominee, he can choose no other

 

He is also the establishment candidate, so Clyburn was again obligated to pick Biden.

 

AND again, he would support Biden over terrific candidate Tim Scott, if he had to also.

 

 

 


Tim Scott is a republican therefore he doesn’t have the interest of black and brown people in mind 

Posted
Just now, JetsFan20 said:


Tim Scott is a republican therefore he doesn’t have the interest of black and brown people in mind 

God Bless America.  God Bless Free Speech.  God Bless The First Amendment.

Posted
1 minute ago, JetsFan20 said:


Tim Scott is a republican therefore he doesn’t have the interest of black and brown people in mind 

giphy.gif

 

Ask a leftist enough and eventually their prejudice will show.

 

 

 

 

.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, JetsFan20 said:


Tim Scott is a republican therefore he doesn’t have the interest of black and brown people in mind 


Someone cut this man’s mic ???

  • Thank you (+1) 2
Posted
8 hours ago, Warren Zevon said:

 

Outside versus inside might be the biggest factor.


I guess you didn’t read or more likely in your case understand the stupidity of the headline of the second picture.  

Posted
3 hours ago, JetsFan20 said:


Tim Scott is a republican therefore he doesn’t have the interest of black and brown people in mind 

ok ... i've had enough. Welcome to my ignorant as %$#@ list.

 

You've chosen to ignore content by JetsFan20

  • Haha (+1) 2
Posted



We benchmark 2 years of fatal shooting data on 16 crime rate estimates. When adjusting for crime, we find no systematic evidence of anti-Black disparities in fatal shootings, fatal shootings of unarmed citizens, or fatal shootings involving misidentification of harmless objects. Multiverse analyses showed only one significant anti-Black disparity of 144 possible tests. Exposure to police given crime rate differences likely accounts for the higher per capita rate of fatal police shootings for Blacks, at least when analyzing all shootings. 

 

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/325752754_Is_There_Evidence_of_Racial_Disparity_in_Police_Use_of_Deadly_Force_Analyses_of_Officer-Involved_Fatal_Shootings_in_2015-2016

 

 

 

  • Thank you (+1) 2
Posted

In 1804 Haitians massacred the remaining white population in the country. They moved from house to house, torturing and butchering white men, women, and children by the thousands. They did so with a full sense of  justice for what the white man had done to them.
 
While we hear about the dangers of white supremacism on a daily basis, there is virtual radio silence on the growing black supremacism and  its role in the riots across the US. How many will recognize this photo as the equivalent of a Neo-Nazi promising to repeat the Holocaust?
 
This is why the myth of systemic racism is so extremely dangerous. It  fuels a narrative of victimhood, wherein every instance of violence is  justifiable as a revolutionary act against the oppressors. It's crucial  that we recognize, deconstruct, and condemn the ideological  underpinnings of this movement.

 

FB_IMG_1593144827185.jpg

  • Thank you (+1) 4
Posted
7 hours ago, Rob's House said:

We benchmark 2 years of fatal shooting data on 16 crime rate estimates. When adjusting for crime, we find no systematic evidence of anti-Black disparities in fatal shootings, fatal shootings of unarmed citizens, or fatal shootings involving misidentification of harmless objects. Multiverse analyses showed only one significant anti-Black disparity of 144 possible tests. Exposure to police given crime rate differences likely accounts for the higher per capita rate of fatal police shootings for Blacks, at least when analyzing all shootings. 

 

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/325752754_Is_There_Evidence_of_Racial_Disparity_in_Police_Use_of_Deadly_Force_Analyses_of_Officer-Involved_Fatal_Shootings_in_2015-2016

 

 

The overall statistics are pretty clear on this if people wish to look at them honestly. The primary reason why violent crime rates and black on black crime within black communities are dismissed as "irrelevant" or, worse, as being "racist," when discussing police killings and allegations of systemic racism, is because honest analyses destroys the national narrative. 

 

These issues are important because they are primary factors that drive the disproportionate amount of police responses to / interactions with black communities, and the nature of those responses / interactions.

 

I don't know what is worse, the violent criminals who are literally terrorizing black communities, or the black leaders and politicians who allow it to continue by turning a blind eye or engaging in willful ignorance for personal or political gain.

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Thank you (+1) 3
Posted
11 minutes ago, billsfan1959 said:

 

The overall statistics are pretty clear on this if people wish to look at them honestly. The primary reason why violent crime rates and black on black crime within black communities are dismissed as "irrelevant" or, worse, as being "racist," when discussing police killings and allegations of systemic racism, is because honest analyses destroys the national narrative. 

 

These issues are important because they are primary factors that drive the disproportionate amount of police responses to / interactions with black communities, and the nature of those responses / interactions.

 

I don't know what is worse, the violent criminals who are literally terrorizing black communities, or the black leaders and politicians who allow it to continue by turning a blind eye or engaging in willful ignorance for personal or political gain.

not to worry, the flames will stop being stoked on November 4th... for another 3 1/2 years.

  • Like (+1) 4
Posted
17 hours ago, JetsFan20 said:


I don’t care about 50 years ago. Joe is going to work with AOC, Elizabeth Warren, and Bernie Sanders to build social programs by taxing the wealthy and big corporations. 

Alright, I think it's about time that I told you a story about some rabbits.

  • Haha (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...