3rdnlng Posted February 8, 2018 Share Posted February 8, 2018 http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2018/02/from_out_of_the_slime_sidney_blumenthal_rears_his_head_again.html When the question of who cooked up the gross, repulsive contents of the Steele Dossier is asked, is anyone surprised the name of Hillary Clinton's consigliere, Sid Blumenthal, comes up? Blumenthal has that kind of mind, and sure enough we read of him again. This time, there's a new memo, created by Senate Republicans Chuck Grassley and Lindsey Graham about the creation of the Steele dossier, and apparently one of the contributors was Sid Blumenthal. According to Fox News: Last month, Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, and Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., made a criminal referral regarding Steele to the FBI. The referral, parts of which were declassified Monday, included a reference to "a foreign source [who] gave information to an unnamed associate of Hillary and Bill Clinton, who then gave information to an unnamed official in the Obama State Department, who then gave the information to Steele." In another section, the referral stated that Steele received information from "a foreign sub-source who is in touch with (redacted), a contact of (redacted), a friend of the Clintons, who passed it to (redacted).'" Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2018/02/from_out_of_the_slime_sidney_blumenthal_rears_his_head_again.html#ixzz56TtIA3wj Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted February 8, 2018 Share Posted February 8, 2018 53 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: And now first reports are coming out: Uranium One Informant Testifies Moscow Sent Millions In Cash to U.S. For Clintons Pay to Play https://truepundit.com/uranium-one-informant-testifies-moscow-sent-millions-cash-u-s-clintons-pay-play/ http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/372861-uranium-one-informant-makes-clinton-allegations-in-testimony?__twitter_impression=true So not just "talked to Russians?" THAT is evidence of collusion. I'm not saying it's true...just that it actually satisfies the definition of "evidence of collusion" better than "talked to Russians about...something, we don't really know what, but we're sure it was bad!" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted February 8, 2018 Share Posted February 8, 2018 9 hours ago, row_33 said: I look forward to Bill and Hillary having to deny it don't get your hopes up, nobody from MSM will pose the question and anyone who does will be branded as #fakenews Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted February 8, 2018 Share Posted February 8, 2018 10 hours ago, DC Tom said: So not just "talked to Russians?" THAT is evidence of collusion. I'm not saying it's true...just that it actually satisfies the definition of "evidence of collusion" better than "talked to Russians about...something, we don't really know what, but we're sure it was bad!" Yes. Of course. The Dems think Campbell is unreliable as a source though he had been working with the FBI for six years on this. However, they have no problem with the veracity of the garbage stories that Steele provided the FBI that he got from people in Russia that he never met. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted February 8, 2018 Share Posted February 8, 2018 2 hours ago, /dev/null said: don't get your hopes up, nobody from MSM will pose the question and anyone who does will be branded as #fakenews I’m not betting on it, but Slick and his lovely wife Bluto have a lot less power than even a month ago Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prickly Pete Posted February 8, 2018 Share Posted February 8, 2018 9 minutes ago, row_33 said: I’m not betting on it, but Slick and his lovely wife Bluto have a lot less power than even a month ago Yes indeed. And I'm wondering how vulnerable they might be after accepting so much money , from so many powerful people, who apparently aren't going to get a "return on their investment". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted February 8, 2018 Share Posted February 8, 2018 1 hour ago, OJABBA said: Yes indeed. And I'm wondering how vulnerable they might be after accepting so much money , from so many powerful people, who apparently aren't going to get a "return on their investment". yup, promises had to have been made for large donations with her assumed guaranteed win and there's nothing inherently wrong with taking the donations for promises on a campaign but some people REALLY don't like getting BURNED on these things, we can't even imagine how cheesed off they could get... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted February 8, 2018 Share Posted February 8, 2018 6 hours ago, row_33 said: yup, promises had to have been made for large donations with her assumed guaranteed win and there's nothing inherently wrong with taking the donations for promises on a campaign but some people REALLY don't like getting BURNED on these things, we can't even imagine how cheesed off they could get... These were not donations made to Clinton's campaign but bribes given to the Clinton Foundation to bring about a preferred outcome. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted February 8, 2018 Share Posted February 8, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted February 8, 2018 Share Posted February 8, 2018 6 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: So I'm confused...was the FBI working for or against Hillary in 2016? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted February 8, 2018 Share Posted February 8, 2018 1 minute ago, DC Tom said: So I'm confused...was the FBI working for or against Hillary in 2016? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted February 8, 2018 Share Posted February 8, 2018 26 minutes ago, DC Tom said: So I'm confused...was the FBI working for or against Hillary in 2016? Yes, no, what does it matter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted February 10, 2018 Share Posted February 10, 2018 (edited) And another coughing fit for Hillary this week. Edited February 10, 2018 by row_33 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted February 10, 2018 Share Posted February 10, 2018 .................... 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cinga Posted February 10, 2018 Share Posted February 10, 2018 48 minutes ago, B-Man said: .................... Russian Collusion? After all, no way should the Eagles have won without it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted February 10, 2018 Share Posted February 10, 2018 The Pats never punted so they really won. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taro T Posted February 10, 2018 Share Posted February 10, 2018 1 hour ago, row_33 said: The Pats never punted so they really won. Brady threw for more yards in this SB than anyone before him had. And far more than Foles threw for. So, clearly, by progresseive logic, the Cheatriots really won. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted February 10, 2018 Share Posted February 10, 2018 Brady did this without his top 2 WRs and a kinda dazed Gronk, so he really won and was really MVP and donated his new SUV to he Clinton Foundation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted February 10, 2018 Share Posted February 10, 2018 2 hours ago, row_33 said: The Pats never punted so they really won. Not to mention the Pats* had more yardage. 3 hours ago, Cinga said: Russian Collusion? After all, no way should the Eagles have won without it! The Russians hacked the replay booth 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted February 11, 2018 Share Posted February 11, 2018 3 hours ago, /dev/null said: The Russians hacked the replay booth You think you're joking...but remember, Putin has a Superbowl ring given to him by none other than Bill Belichick himself... 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts