TNF Would you rather?

[YoloinOhio]

Who would you rather have?

Edited November 12, 2015 by YoloinOhio

[Fan in Chicago]

You should have included the coaches in the poll also

[Canadian Bills Fan]

Great poll

 

 

I picked all the Bills selections except WR

 

 

 

CBF

[YoloinOhio]

You should have included the coaches in the poll also

I actually tried to add TE but it only allowed 3 questions

 

Edit - I added TE on to the WR group

Edited November 12, 2015 by YoloinOhio

[Kirby Jackson]

The only one that is debatable to me is WR. The Bills have the best player but the Jets have better depth. The tiebreaker for me is that I factored in the TE position to break it.

[eball]

The only one that is debatable to me is WR. The Bills have the best player but the Jets have better depth. The tiebreaker for me is that I factored in the TE position to break it.

 

My thinking as well. TE puts Bills over the top.

[YoloinOhio]

Zero votes for Fitz Magic?

[Big C]

The only one that is debatable to me is WR. The Bills have the best player but the Jets have better depth. The tiebreaker for me is that I factored in the TE position to break it.

 

In this game, the Jets receivers may have the edge, but long term I'll take Watkins and Woods over Marshall and Decker.

[Buffalos#1Fan]

WR is definitely debatable, but ours are younger with much higher upside now.

[Fadingpain]

If only the outcomes of NFL football games could be decided in this overly simplistic manner!

 

We'd be a lock to win tonight!

 

In reality, this is going to be a tough one.

[YoloinOhio]

If only the outcomes of NFL football games could be decided in this overly simplistic manner!

 

We'd be a lock to win tonight!

 

In reality, this is going to be a tough one.

It is just a poll for fun.Why so serious? Edited November 12, 2015 by YoloinOhio

[dulles]

I think Watkins, Woods and Hogan give up a little to Marshall, Decker, Kerley, but Cumberland? Really?!?

Clay makes the difference with the receivers.

[BillsFan-4-Ever]

I was tempted to vote Brandon Marshall/Eric Decker/Jeremy Kerley/Kembrell Thompkins/James Cumberland bus said it

[YoloinOhio]

I think Watkins, Woods and Hogan give up a little to Marshall, Decker, Kerley, but Cumberland? Really?!?

Clay makes the difference with the receivers.

i guess we could add Devin Smith to their WR group but Chan hates him and he never plays.

[Dorkington]

WR question was tough, but Clay put me over the edge.

 

I'll take the Bills offensive players over the Jets... and it seems the Jets D is better, but I still think that's scheme, and not players.

[WhitewalkerInPhilly]

Do we want to include O-line and D-line in there? Those are my main concerns.

[YoloinOhio]

Do we want to include O-line and D-line in there? Those are my main concerns.

it only allows 3 questions max in the poll

 

I would choose Bills OL and Jets DL. If we had Kyle Williams playing I would pick Bills. If the Jets weren't so injured on OL I would take theirs.

 

Jets OTs have been brutal though. I don't know if that Giacomi guy is a starter or backup but he's been bad.

Edited November 12, 2015 by YoloinOhio

[Talley56]

wow, 45 - 0 in favor of both our QB and RB situation. I wonder if anyone will take the leap and be the first to go against the grain there. Honestly, I could really understand someone taking Fitz over TT. Taylor has looked good, just like Fitz and even Trent did at one point. In order for him to be firmly ahead of Fitz though he needs to be consistent the entire year all the way through to the end and keep us playoff competitive. Despite our defensive struggles I still think our defense of today is better than any defenses we had when Fitz was our QB so I think that's a distinct advantage TT has working for him.

[quinnearlysghost88]

Who would you rather have?

That was too easy, and plus we've already tasted the Fitzmagic. I'm all set. Honestly, if you flipped the question to Jets fans, I dont know how they could want their QB or RB situation over ours. The WRs could be a toss up.

[Fadingpain]

It is just a poll for fun.Why so serious?

Not serious, though I suppose that tone could be read into my comments.