Jump to content

Rule passed banning (Pats*) use of ineligible receivers


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 137
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Well they weren't cheating then...

 

Yeah, they were. Following the letter of the rules while violating the spirit of them is called "gaming the system," and it's considered cheating.

 

And that's above and beyond the fact that they were violating the rules by improperly declaring eligible/ineligible status on consecutive plays, to get around the substitution rules.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who will be the first linebacker to change their number to the 40s?

 

Don't know exactly, but I'm sure that 1) it'll be a Pats linebacker, and 2) they'll somehow find a way to abuse this rule, too. Prrobably something to do with lining up linebackers at tight end or something.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Yeah, they were. Following the letter of the rules while violating the spirit of them is called "gaming the system," and it's considered cheating.

 

And that's above and beyond the fact that they were violating the rules by improperly declaring eligible/ineligible status on consecutive plays, to get around the substitution rules.

By you anyway." Violating the spirit of the rules." Would love to see that one called.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

It would have been either an illegal substitution or an illegal formation.

The rule violated was that a player declared eligible (or ineligible) has to leave the field and come back on to be considered the ineligible (or eligible).

that's the one. He (they) played ineligible then eligible w/o leaving the field.

Edited by BillsFan-4-Ever
Link to comment
Share on other sites

that's the one.

 

And they frequently kept players declared eligible/ineligible on the field for multiple plays - the whole second half of the Ravens game, there was an offensive lineman declared eligible for more than half the plays, including several consecutive plays. But they rarely switched the players' status on the field - that happened maybe three times, and I think only the one time was it done improperly.

 

Personally, I think a rule that a player declared eligible/ineligible for a play must be off the field for the next play would have been better. The rule they created is good, but it just makes it easier to catch this practice, rather than inhibiting it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...