Jump to content

Eagles searching for trade parter for G. Evan Mathis


Recommended Posts

I don't know this guy but to me the thread title tells me everything i need to know. A lineman, particularly a guard, has to be willing to get dirty and play tough. A guy who calls himself G. Evan Mathis should probably be a lawyer or a consultant for a Wall Street firm. An NFL guard? I don't think so. Too snooty.

Fitzgibbons went to Harvard. There's a lot of really smart guys that also play football....and G. Evan is a really good football player according to Joe B.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 128
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I'm just thinking out of the box. People like to insult Chip Kelly for making crazy moves, but at least he's being innovative. I suggest something that might seem crazy, but y'all just want to play it safe. Where has playing it safe gotten us? The longest current playoff drought in NFL history.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm just thinking out of the box. People like to insult Chip Kelly for making crazy moves, but at least he's being innovative. I suggest something that might seem crazy, but y'all just want to play it safe. Where has playing it safe gotten us? The longest current playoff drought in NFL history.

 

 

Define longest current drought in history.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Um, the 15 year drought we're in now. It's the longest current one in history. Meaning no team has currently gone longer than we have in the history of the league right now.

 

I have had the longest current headache in my history since 8:25 AM in the morning. Would you go with Advil or Tylenol?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm just thinking out of the box. People like to insult Chip Kelly for making crazy moves, but at least he's being innovative. I suggest something that might seem crazy, but y'all just want to play it safe. Where has playing it safe gotten us? The longest current playoff drought in NFL history.

 

Father, why is this Pre-Season unlike all the other Pre-Seasons?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm just thinking out of the box. People like to insult Chip Kelly for making crazy moves, but at least he's being innovative. I suggest something that might seem crazy, but y'all just want to play it safe. Where has playing it safe gotten us? The longest current playoff drought in NFL history.

 

Nothing says "thinking out of the box" like the cliche "thinking out of the box."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Finding out today that the Eagles were interested in Woods for McCoy, they should call up Chip and offer Woods for Mathis.

I wouldn't trade Woods for Mathis but if they are planning on cutting Mathis, I would trade Hogan for him. Chip might be able to do something with Hogan as a 3 or 4. We would save a little money on Hogan so we can afford Mathis, and it would be much better to trade for him than to try to sign him as a FA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't trade Woods for Mathis but if they are planning on cutting Mathis, I would trade Hogan for him. Chip might be able to do something with Hogan as a 3 or 4. We would save a little money on Hogan so we can afford Mathis, and it would be much better to trade for him than to try to sign him as a FA.

 

If they'd take Hogan, that's definitely the better deal for us, but I think I would be willing to offer up to Woods. We're deep enough at WR with Watkins, Harvin, and Clay, and I am not opposed to Hogan at 3 next year and drafting a receiver late this year or mid-range next year if Harvin doesn't work out, and the OL is in rough enough shape that a guard who only has 2 years left is worth it. Mathis has more ability to be contributing to whether "win now" works out more than Woods does as a strong #3 receiver on a run-first team.

 

i woudnt make that trade. Mathis is a decade older than woods. I would trade something for him, but not woods.

 

If we weren't cap strapped, I would say just trade whatever you need to. Trade the #2, to me, its about the same value since we're hoping to draft an immediate contributor to the OL at this point. By trading a player like Woods, you save that much cap room, and then you save more by cutting the redundant Chris Williams. Of course, this only makes sense if you stop trading picks for veterans because that is not a sustainable strategy to build a consistently winning team, but I don't think that is how Whaley or Rex or Pegula are thinking. They want to win now is all and it make sense and this would be the strongest way to do it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...