B-Man Posted February 16, 2017 Share Posted February 16, 2017 A Climate Scientist Is Smeared for Blowing the Whistle on ‘Corrected’ Data by Julie KellyRead more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/444942/john-bates-whistleblower-climate-scientist-smeared-global-warming-advocates Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExiledInIllinois Posted February 16, 2017 Share Posted February 16, 2017 A Climate Scientist Is Smeared for Blowing the Whistle on Corrected Data by Julie Kelly Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/444942/john-bates-whistleblower-climate-scientist-smeared-global-warming-advocates Leaker! Stone them! Traitor! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted February 16, 2017 Share Posted February 16, 2017 Climate Change Denial Denial. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted February 17, 2017 Share Posted February 17, 2017 SENATE CONFIRMS SCOTT PRUITT TO HEAD EPA: One of our undercover reporters has brought back hidden camera video from inside the EPA’s offices when Pruitt was confirmed. EXCLUSIVE — MUST CREDIT INSTAPUNDIT https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ElJFYwRtrH4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted February 18, 2017 Share Posted February 18, 2017 SENATE CONFIRMS SCOTT PRUITT TO HEAD EPA: One of our undercover reporters has brought back hidden camera video from inside the EPA’s offices when Pruitt was confirmed. EXCLUSIVE — MUST CREDIT INSTAPUNDIT http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ElJFYwRtrH4 And people say Trump's crazy. These wack jobs look like they'd get lost in the woods, have sex with the animals, and die of starvation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bbb Posted February 20, 2017 Share Posted February 20, 2017 A Climate Scientist Is Smeared for Blowing the Whistle on ‘Corrected’ Data by Julie Kelly Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/444942/john-bates-whistleblower-climate-scientist-smeared-global-warming-advocates Somehow, I am Carl Paladino's mass email list (I think he took from a Bonnies list I'm on). This just came to my inbox: Lawrence Solomon: Finally it’s safe for the whistleblowers of corrupted climate science to speak outLawrence Solomon Thursday, Feb. 16, 2017 AP Photo/John McConnico, File Whistleblowers at the U.S. government’s official keeper of the global warming stats, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), claim their agency doctored temperature data to hide the fact that global temperatures plateaued almost 20 years ago. Can the whistleblowers be believed in this claim, originally made in 2015? And in the further claim that NOAA then rushed this doctored data into print in time for the UN’s Paris global warming summit of world leaders, to dupe any doubters that the planet was in fact overheated? Of course the whistleblowers can be believed, and not just because NOAA repeatedly stonewalled inquiries, even failing to comply with a congressional subpoena. No one paying attention can have any doubt that the governmental global warming enterprise has been a fraud. It’s been lies from the start, starting with the very mandate of the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, which astonishingly ruled out factors like the sun as being worthy of investigation. Among those astonished was the Danish delegation to the IPCC. It discovered at one of the IPCC’s early meetings a quarter-century ago that its scientists could not present their study, newly published in the prestigious journal Science, showing a remarkable correlation between global warming and solar activity. To their further astonishment, to squelch dissent the IPCC cabal set out to destroy the reputation of its chief author, falsely accusing him of fabricating data. Dissenters from the climate change orthodoxy soon learned that, if they refused to recant, they stood to lose their jobs, their funding, and their reputations. They also learned the corollary: to get hired, to get funded, to get promoted, they needed to produce the science the authorities wanted. Governments annually spent billions of dollars on climate change research, virtually all of it commissioned to prove that the science was settled — that man-made climate change represented an existential threat to the planet. None of the billions spent on research amounted to anything — none of the models proved reliable, none of the predictions were borne out, none of the expected effects materialized. The Arctic ice cap hasn’t disappeared, polar bear populations haven’t declined, hurricanes haven’t become more common, malaria hasn’t spread, temperatures haven’t continued to climb. What did materialize was fraud after fraud. Climategate — the 2009 revelations of hacked emails showing scientists labouring to manipulate data and cover their tracks — was followed by Climategate 2.0 (a second damning batch of hacked emails), by Amazongate (the revelation that the IPCC’s claim of coming devastation in the Amazon was based on non-peer-reviewed research by WWF eco-activists), Glaciergate (here the IPCC relied on speculation in a popular magazine) and other scandals. The mega-fraud was the assertion that the science was settled, which the IPCC trumpeted with claims that 2,500 scientists from around the world endorsed its findings. Except those 2,500 — a number that was soon inflated to 3,000 and then 4,000 — didn’t endorse anything. They merely reviewed some of the studies heaved into the IPCC’s maw, many of them giving the research the thumbs down. Likewise, a much heralded claim that 97 per cent of scientists believed the planet was overheating came from a 2008 master’s thesis by a student at the University of Illinois who obtained her results by conducting a survey of 10,257 earth scientists, then discarding the views of all but 77 of them. Of those 77 scientists, 75 thought humans contributed to climate change. The ratio 75/77 produced the 97-per-cent figure that global warming activists then touted. In fact, major surveys show that scientists in the tens of thousands do not believe that global warming represents a threat. With the departure of president Obama and his administration, which had blocked independent investigations from being pursued, whistleblowers in greater numbers will now dare to come forward, knowing they will no longer be silenced. One of them is Dr. John Bates, a recently retired principal scientist at NOAA, who described how his agency manipulated data to manufacture a non-existent increase in global temperatures. In a press release last week, U.S. House Science, Space, and Technology Committee chairman Lamar Smith thanked “Dr. John Bates for courageously stepping forward to tell the truth about NOAA’s senior officials playing fast and loose with the data in order to meet a politically predetermined conclusion.” This week a second press release from the same committee indicated that NOAA will be brought to account. The blizzard of lies from NOAA and other corrupted agencies will soon be outed in excruciating detail. The greatest scientific fraud of the century will thus be laid bare, along with its craven and corrupt enablers in government, academia, industry and the media. Lawrence Solomon is executive director of Energy Probe, a Toronto-based environmental group. LawrenceSolomon@nextcity.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted February 21, 2017 Share Posted February 21, 2017 Princeton Professor: Climate Change Activists are a 'Cult'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted February 22, 2017 Share Posted February 22, 2017 Climate Models Are Warming Earth Two Times Faster Than Reality. “So far in the 21st century, the GCMs are warming, on average, about a factor of 2 faster than the observed temperature increase,” Dr. Judith Curry, a former Georgia Tech climate scientist who now runs her own climate forecasting company, wrote in a report for the U.K.-based Global Warming Policy Foundation. Curry has been one of the foremost critics of climate models, arguing that while they can be useful, there are too many uncertainties and issues to rely on models for public policy decisions. Curry’s report gives a detailed rundown of why models can be useful for modeling complex climate systems, but also points out that GCMs fail to capture natural variability in the climate. “The reason for the discrepancy between observations and model simulations in the early 21st century appears to be caused by a combination of inadequate simulations of natural internal variability and oversensitivity of the models to increasing carbon dioxide,” wrote Curry. Reality must be made to better conform to the models, which are of course correct..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted February 25, 2017 Share Posted February 25, 2017 WHO CAN ARGUE WITH SCIENCE? Hundreds of scientists urge Trump to withdraw from U.N. climate-change agency. More than 300 scientists have urged President Trump to withdraw from the U.N.’s climate change agency, warning that its push to curtail carbon dioxide threatens to exacerbate poverty without improving the environment. In a Thursday letter to the president, MIT professor emeritus Richard Lindzen called on the United States and other nations to “change course on an outdated international agreement that targets minor greenhouse gases,” starting with carbon dioxide. “Since 2009, the US and other governments have undertaken actions with respect to global climate that are not scientifically justified and that already have, and will continue to cause serious social and economic harm — with no environmental benefits,” said Mr. Lindzen, a prominent atmospheric physicist. Signers of the attached petition include the U.S. and international atmospheric scientists, meteorologists, physicists, professors and others taking issue with the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change [uNFCCC], which was formed in 1992 to combat “dangerous” climate change. The 2016 Paris climate accord, which sets nonbinding emissions goals for nations, was drawn up under the auspices of the UNFCCC. “Observations since the UNFCCC was written 25 years ago show that warming from increased atmospheric CO2 will be benign — much less than initial model predictions,” says the petition. I guess the science is settled. You don’t want to be anti-science, do you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted February 25, 2017 Share Posted February 25, 2017 At last! Consensus has been reached! Hallelujah! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted February 28, 2017 Share Posted February 28, 2017 Leonardo DiCaprio few an eyebrow artist 7,500 miles TO DO HIS EYEBROWS FOR THE OSCARS! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meazza Posted March 1, 2017 Share Posted March 1, 2017 http://blog.dilbert.com/post/157823678756/tucker-carlson-induces-cognitive-dissonance-in Bill Nye the science guy!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted March 1, 2017 Share Posted March 1, 2017 Miami is already deep into the process of adjusting to increased flooding from climate change. But its a hoax http://www.npr.org/2016/05/10/476071206/as-waters-rise-miami-beach-builds-higher-streets-and-political-willpower Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azalin Posted March 1, 2017 Share Posted March 1, 2017 http://blog.dilbert.com/post/157823678756/tucker-carlson-induces-cognitive-dissonance-in Bill Nye the science guy!!! I watched that the other night. Nye comes off as more of a preacher than a scientist. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted March 1, 2017 Share Posted March 1, 2017 Miami is already deep into the process of adjusting to increased flooding from climate change. But its a hoax http://www.npr.org/2016/05/10/476071206/as-waters-rise-miami-beach-builds-higher-streets-and-political-willpower The oceans aren't rising. Miami is sinking. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted March 1, 2017 Share Posted March 1, 2017 The oceans aren't rising. Miami is sinking. No, climate change is real and man made Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gary M Posted March 1, 2017 Share Posted March 1, 2017 (edited) Miami is already deep into the process of adjusting to increased flooding from climate change. But its a hoax http://www.npr.org/2016/05/10/476071206/as-waters-rise-miami-beach-builds-higher-streets-and-political-willpower No, climate change is real and man made Can you tell me how much man is contributing to it. Bill Nye couldn't http://blog.dilbert.com/post/157823678756/tucker-carlson-induces-cognitive-dissonance-in Bill Nye the science guy!!! Edited March 1, 2017 by Gary M Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azalin Posted March 1, 2017 Share Posted March 1, 2017 The oceans aren't rising. Miami is sinking. Nye also needs to clarify one of his points. He stated that as the oceans warm, they expand. That is not true. Water expands as it cools and contracts as it warms. The only thing he could have been referring to is the melting of polar or glacial ice, but he should make that distinction if he is going to argue from the scientific perspective. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted March 1, 2017 Share Posted March 1, 2017 Nye also needs to clarify one of his points. He stated that as the oceans warm, they expand. That is not true. Water expands as it cools and contracts as it warms. The only thing he could have been referring to is the melting of polar or glacial ice, but he should make that distinction if he is going to argue from the scientific perspective. I never understand why people turn to Bill Nye on this topic. It's like doing a documentary on advanced contemporary music theory by interviewing the kids who did the opening song for "Zoom!" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azalin Posted March 1, 2017 Share Posted March 1, 2017 It's like doing a documentary on advanced contemporary music theory by interviewing the kids who did the opening song for "Zoom!" That was a real show?! Good grief, I thought Captain Kangaroo was bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts