Jump to content

A little late, yet interesting - JCUTLER V RFITZPATRICK


ctk232

Recommended Posts

To be honest, I have never thought of Cutler as a quality QB, capable of being a true starting caliber QB in the NFL. However this comparison between him and Fitz is a great insight into how media attention can shape and define certain player's careers:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 56
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

It is definitely interesting to see those stats put up side by side, but I'll agree with the OP in that I've never really liked Cutler and feel he is over-hyped. That said, we'll soon see what he can do in a system directed by an offensive guru like Trestman.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is definitely interesting to see those stats put up side by side, but I'll agree with the OP in that I've never really liked Cutler and feel he is over-hyped. That said, we'll soon see what he can do in a system directed by an offensive guru like Trestman.

it's my opinion that cutler gets a lot more slack than most qbs in his peer group because of his arm strength. if he made the same decisions and had the same attitude with average arm strength, he would be somebody's third stringer right now, maybe even fighting for a roster spot. but, you cannot teach "holy crap, that guy's got a rocket launcher on his shoulder!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

it's my opinion that cutler gets a lot more slack than most qbs in his peer group because of his arm strength. if he made the same decisions and had the same attitude with average arm strength, he would be somebody's third stringer right now, maybe even fighting for a roster spot. but, you cannot teach "holy crap, that guy's got a rocket launcher on his shoulder!"

 

that is a big part of it.

 

the fact that hes won games and been in the playoffs (even if the D should get a lot of credit) also helps him.

 

last up, if we were doing basic rankings - how far apart would they really fall? Cutler is starting to solidly come up outside the top 10 and in the teens often i think. League average or slightly above with huge upside physically. Fitz typically comes up around 20 so slightly below league average but maxed out already.

 

 

just shooting off the cuff and not ordered....

manning

manning

brees

brady

rodgers

matt ryan

big ben

flacco

Luck

 

then you get into a mess of

stafford, romo, cutler, schaub, maybe even rivers or palmer (depending on how you view their career arcs currently) as vets that arent in that top tier and young guys with a lot of potential (CK, RG3, R Wilson)

 

then right behind that group would be fitz. depending on where you view cutler in that mess they could end up pretty close.

Edited by NoSaint
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It all boils down to defense. The bears D is fair superior and has won or put them in a better position to win games over this span. Had we had the bears D or a statistical equivalent (including their turnover +/-) over the last three years, Fitz and Chan would still be here and we may have had a playoff appearance or two. All that said, our D sucked, which forced Fitz to throw more late in games, which led to inopportune turnovers. Perception is reality. The Bears win more (not based on Cutler doing anything better statisically than Fitz). As a result, Cutler is viewed as a better QB, not because he is, but because of their D and special teams.

Edited by Jamie Nails
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a decent piece, but the big point the author leaves out is that he's comparing the best 4 years of Fitzpatrick's career, by far, to 4 typical Cutler years. Actually, you could argue that both his full years starting in Denver (with a good O-line and real receivers) were better than his average season in Chicago. I honestly don't feel like Cutler is overrated at all. Does anyone think he's a top 5 QB? I've never seen anyone say that. I doubt anyone besides Chicago homers would put him in the top 10, either. Fitz was about the 20th-best starter over the last 4 years, Cutler's probably something like 12th or 13th. The differences are:

 

1.) Cutler had no O-line, whereas Fitz had at least a decent one, possibly really good. (We'll see how much of the O-line's success was due to Chan's scheme.)

 

2.) Cutler isn't a limited player -- he can make all the throws, and has shown in individual games that he can win a game almost singlehandedly. He's not consistent enough to do it regularly, but Fitz was always a limited guy who needed a scheme to get guys open for him. Once defenses figured out how to play against that scheme, Fitz was pretty much toast.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cutler WAY Over rated. I can't see Chicago paying the guy

 

where do you think most people rate him? At best fringe to the top ten? I dont think he falls considerably lower than that in ability or higher than that in perception

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great piece, thanks for pointing it out!

 

From those stats one would say that defense and special teams was the issue for the Bills these past 4 years. The reality isnt far off, take out the Jauron\Fewell year and the numbers are worse, Gailey failed big time on special teams and defense production. Funny thing is that during the Jauron years it was the exact opposite (lousy offense, great special teams, good to reasonable defense).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

that is a big part of it.

 

the fact that hes won games and been in the playoffs (even if the D should get a lot of credit) also helps him.

 

last up, if we were doing basic rankings - how far apart would they really fall? Cutler is starting to solidly come up outised the top 10 and in the teens often i think. League average or slightly above with huge upside physically. Fitz typically comes up around 20 so slightly below league average but maxed out already.

 

 

just shooting off the cuff and not ordered....

manning

manning

brees

brady

rodgers

matt ryan

big ben

flacco

Luck

 

then you get into a mess of

stafford, romo, cutler, schaub, maybe even rivers or palmer (depending on how you view their career arcs currently) as vets that arent in that top tier and young guys with a lot of potential (CK, RG3, R Wilson)

 

then right behind that group would be fitz. depending on where you view cutler in that mess they could end up pretty close.

where do you think most people rate him? At best fringe to the top ten? I dont think he falls considerably lower than that in ability or higher than that in perception

 

Yah I've always said 95% of fans have no clue what over/underrated means. You have to be better or worse than how the majority of media/fans perceive you. Cutler is the new Romo. So many people get off on shouting "overrated!" that it loses all meaning. Nobody that I know of ever considered them elite guys; but it's fun to pretend otherwise so you can call them overrated I guess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Million dollar arm, ten cent head. Some of the worst decision making you'll see at times. It's one thing to make bad throws; every QB alive does that. It's quite another to make STUPID throws and Cutler does that far more than you'd like to see. And his mechanics suck because he relies too much on his rocket and gets lazy with his feet.

 

GO BILLS!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cutler rules.....last 3 seasons he has had no OL whatsoever Puuuuuuurriod.

 

Fitz is a crappy backup with a baby arm........Cutler will shine IMO with these FA OL and WR moves the Bears have made finally.

 

Here's to the last thread about Fitz! :beer: It's EJ time baby!

Edited by Ryan L Billz
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...