DC Tom Posted June 28, 2016 Share Posted June 28, 2016 It should come as no surprise that most of the media is yawning through the Benghazi report, and it's too bad because you really get a sense of how self-absorbed and incompetent this administration is. That they lied to the public about the video, and then lied to the faces of the victims' families, and then lied about the victims' families is telling...no yet STILL the left is eager to give Hillary Barry's third term. But then you read about how Hillary's' state department made the Marines to change in and out of attire, from civilian to cammies, four freaking times because while Americans were being murdered in a terror attack, Hillary was worried about what it would look like if Marines went in to save everyone while wearing a uniform. Doesn't surprise me in the least. As First Lady, she demanded the President's Marine guard grow their hair out so they didn't "look military." That's Hillary. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted June 28, 2016 Share Posted June 28, 2016 That's who they are.............. Republicans on #Benghazi committee note "Trump" appears more times in the Dems' report than names of actual victims Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted June 28, 2016 Share Posted June 28, 2016 That's who they are.............. Republicans on #Benghazi committee note "Trump" appears more times in the Dems' report than names of actual victims Why the F would Trump's name appear anywhere in the Dems' report, much less more times than the names of the victims? Pathetic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drinkTHEkoolaid Posted June 28, 2016 Share Posted June 28, 2016 (edited) Why the F would Trump's name appear anywhere in the Dems' report, much less more times than the names of the victims? Pathetic. They only care about their image, getting elected and consolidaing more power. Period. Anyone who gets in the way of their objective is an after thought. They are entitled sociopaths. The entire progressive movement thinks the end justified the means. Edited June 28, 2016 by drinkTHEkoolaid Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted June 28, 2016 Share Posted June 28, 2016 CNN screen grab from this morning tells you all you need to know... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted June 28, 2016 Share Posted June 28, 2016 Hillary Clinton's first comments after #Benghazi report: "It found nothing." You mean.............other than your private server in a bathroom somewhere.................. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
unbillievable Posted June 29, 2016 Share Posted June 29, 2016 CNN screen grab from this morning tells you all you need to know... It says nothing NEW. That's what happens when you get the charges right the first time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
birdog1960 Posted June 29, 2016 Share Posted June 29, 2016 you've been played, by such a fly speck as whatever-his-first name-is, gowdy. pathetic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drinkTHEkoolaid Posted June 29, 2016 Share Posted June 29, 2016 you've been played, by such a fly speck as whatever-his-first name-is, gowdy. pathetic. You blindly support a candidate who should be in prison. I would hardly say you're in a position of morally principled superiority. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
birdog1960 Posted June 29, 2016 Share Posted June 29, 2016 (edited) You blindly support a candidate who should be in prison. I would hardly say you're in a position of morally principled superiority. this is bare knuckle politics. moral superiority isn't a consideration. gowdy = fail. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/powerpost/wp/2016/06/28/house-benghazi-report-reveals-little-new-information-about-hillary-clinton/ The South Carolina Republican, a former federal prosecutor, insisted that former House speaker John A. Boehner (R-Ohio) and current speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) never “asked me to do anything about presidential politics” on the panel, which was formed in May 2014. “My job is to report facts,” Gowdy told reporters. “You can draw whatever conclusions you want to draw.” yeah. sure. you lose. Edited June 29, 2016 by birdog1960 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted June 29, 2016 Share Posted June 29, 2016 (edited) You're being played by HiLIARy. Which is what Gowdy revealed. You either don't realize it, or don't care. Neither of which look good. Edited June 29, 2016 by Doc Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azalin Posted June 29, 2016 Share Posted June 29, 2016 this is bare knuckle politics. moral superiority isn't a consideration. gowdy = fail. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/powerpost/wp/2016/06/28/house-benghazi-report-reveals-little-new-information-about-hillary-clinton/ The South Carolina Republican, a former federal prosecutor, insisted that former House speaker John A. Boehner (R-Ohio) and current speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) never “asked me to do anything about presidential politics” on the panel, which was formed in May 2014. “My job is to report facts,” Gowdy told reporters. “You can draw whatever conclusions you want to draw.” yeah. sure. you lose. If it's your belief that neither the administration, or Hillary herself, had any hand in anything that happened in Benghazi, then your outrage right now seems completely out of whack. I would think at this point that you'd be happy at how things are turning out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4merper4mer Posted June 29, 2016 Share Posted June 29, 2016 yeah. sure. you lose. Neither Clinton nor Gowdy lost. The parents of those brave men with Hillary's saliva on their graves are the ones that lost. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keepthefaith Posted June 29, 2016 Share Posted June 29, 2016 Yup, nothing new. We still don't know why requests for additional security at the embassy were ignored, who got the calls for help the night of the attack and what options were discussed, who gave the orders not to defend our people and who agreed with those orders, who came up with the internet video story and made the decision to go with that as the explanation or why so much of the media continues to cover up for Obama, Hillary and others. you've been played, by such a fly speck as whatever-his-first name-is, gowdy. pathetic. Gowdy is only guilty of doing a lousy job of getting to the bottom of this. If you watched any of Hillary's marathon testimony and the questions asked by the committee you come to realize that the best and most capable attorney's don't seek public office. Good lawyers would have ripped her to shreds in terms of exposing her lies and in a lot less time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted June 29, 2016 Share Posted June 29, 2016 you've been played, by such a fly speck as whatever-his-first name-is, gowdy. pathetic.you want her as president in one sentence. The next you want FBI terror watchlist suspects restricted from buying guns. See the irony or are you that blind? you've been played, by such a fly speck as whatever-his-first name-is, gowdy. pathetic.you want her as president in one sentence. The next you want FBI terror watchlist suspects restricted from buying guns. See the irony or are you that blind? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted June 29, 2016 Share Posted June 29, 2016 WELL, YES: Obama administration more concerned with re-election than lives in Benghazi. Benghazi lies were just standard procedure under Obama. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
birdog1960 Posted June 29, 2016 Share Posted June 29, 2016 Neither Clinton nor Gowdy lost. The parents of those brave men with Hillary's saliva on their graves are the ones that lost. who were president and sec state when this happened? http://adst.org/2013/04/the-bombing-of-u-s-embassy-beirut-april-18-1983/ is their saliva on the graves of those that died that day in 1983? my opinion is that it is not. it's a dangerous world with evil people and terrorists. tragedies like this will inevitably occur. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted June 29, 2016 Share Posted June 29, 2016 who were president and sec state when this happened? http://adst.org/2013/04/the-bombing-of-u-s-embassy-beirut-april-18-1983/ is their saliva on the graves of those that died that day in 1983? Who was president when this happened? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attack_on_Pearl_Harbor Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
birdog1960 Posted June 29, 2016 Share Posted June 29, 2016 (edited) Who was president when this happened? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attack_on_Pearl_Harbor your point? many here consider Reagan to have been one of the greatest prez's. many on the left feel the same about Roosevelt. the fact that these events occurred on their watch hasn't changed that. terrible events with terrible people responsible for them happen. Edited June 29, 2016 by birdog1960 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted June 29, 2016 Share Posted June 29, 2016 (edited) who were president and sec state when this happened? http://adst.org/2013/04/the-bombing-of-u-s-embassy-beirut-april-18-1983/ is their saliva on the graves of those that died that day in 1983? my opinion is that it is not. it's a dangerous world with evil people and terrorists. tragedies like this will inevitably occur. It's not the evil that people question. It's the ridiculously incompetent response that came from Obama and Hillary, leaving four Americans for dead while trying to figure out how to dress their soliders, and trying to pass it off on a Youtube video when every thinking person knew differently. Edited June 29, 2016 by LABillzFan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts