Dante Posted July 16, 2011 Share Posted July 16, 2011 And in the recent bizzaro trend we get to hear from Mr. Sheila Jackson Lee. I was just pointing out the lunacy of it all. If they want to use cheap politics so can anyone Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barack Obama Posted July 16, 2011 Share Posted July 16, 2011 And here comes the race card http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/house/171807-sheila-jackson-lee-suggests-congress-complicating-debt-ceiling-because-obama-is-black Yes We Can! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted July 16, 2011 Share Posted July 16, 2011 We should follow the Social Democrat's dream - send the government all of our money, then apply for handouts for everything we need. From each according to their ability, to each according to their need. It's a simple solution for simpletons. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave_In_Norfolk Posted July 16, 2011 Author Share Posted July 16, 2011 We should follow the Social Democrat's dream - send the government all of our money, then apply for handouts for everything we need. From each according to their ability, to each according to their need. It's a simple solution for simpletons. Actually, the tax cuts are a small part of the deal Obama is offering. It's mostly cuts in spending, but the Birther Congress will not go for it. Wonder why? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted July 16, 2011 Share Posted July 16, 2011 Actually, the tax cuts are a small part of the deal Obama is offering. It's mostly cuts in spending, but the Birther Congress will not go for it. Wonder why? Because he's half white? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted July 16, 2011 Share Posted July 16, 2011 Because he's half white? I thought it was because the Bilderburghers at Bohemian Grove wouldn't let him Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted July 16, 2011 Share Posted July 16, 2011 Actually, the tax cuts are a small part of the deal Obama is offering. It's mostly cuts in spending, but the Birther Congress will not go for it. Wonder why? Tax CUTS? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted July 16, 2011 Share Posted July 16, 2011 http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=109&session=2&vote=00054 Principles at work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted July 16, 2011 Share Posted July 16, 2011 http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=109&session=2&vote=00054 Principles at work. Yeah but that was like different or something Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave_In_Norfolk Posted July 16, 2011 Author Share Posted July 16, 2011 Yeah but that was like different or something Ya, cause it actually didn't matter then. The Tea Partiers like Paul Ryan and Ron Paul morons actually think it's just fine to default "for a few days" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magox Posted July 16, 2011 Share Posted July 16, 2011 (edited) Ya, cause it actually didn't matter then. The Tea Partiers like Paul Ryan and Ron Paul morons actually think it's just fine to default "for a few days" Yet the one you love voted against raising the debt limit when he was senator. I guess that was different, I mean, if most of the senators would of voted against it then, we wouldnt of defaulted right? Right? I guess in your book that makes Obama a moron as well. Edited July 16, 2011 by Magox Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave_In_Norfolk Posted July 16, 2011 Author Share Posted July 16, 2011 Ha ha, I'm crazy cause I believe this too.... http://www.buffalonews.com/wire-feeds/24-hour-national-news/article491034.ece So obviously true. Hey, where's his birth certificate? Yet the one you love voted against raising the debt limit when he was senator. I guess that was different, I mean, if most of the senators would of voted against it then, we wouldnt of defaulted right? Right? I guess in your book that makes Obama a moron as well. A meaningless protest vote makes no one a moron. Perhaps the moron is the one saying these two situations are the same? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magox Posted July 16, 2011 Share Posted July 16, 2011 Ha ha, I'm crazy cause I believe this too.... http://www.buffalonews.com/wire-feeds/24-hour-national-news/article491034.ece So obviously true. Hey, where's his birth certificate? A meaningless protest vote makes no one a moron. Perhaps the moron is the one saying these two situations are the same? Oh I get it, when Obama does it, its a protest vote, but when others do.... Idiot Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adam Posted July 16, 2011 Share Posted July 16, 2011 We should follow the Social Democrat's dream - send the government all of our money, then apply for handouts for everything we need. From each according to their ability, to each according to their need. It's a simple solution for simpletons. It is oversimplification. That is what the liberals want, just like the neocons want to eradicate all entitlements and social services. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave_In_Norfolk Posted July 16, 2011 Author Share Posted July 16, 2011 Oh I get it, when Obama does it, its a protest vote, but when others do.... Idiot Are you really this stupid? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim in Anchorage Posted July 16, 2011 Share Posted July 16, 2011 Ha ha, I'm crazy cause I believe this too.... http://www.buffalonews.com/wire-feeds/24-hour-national-news/article491034.ece So obviously true. Hey, where's his birth certificate? A meaningless protest vote makes no one a moron. Perhaps the moron is the one saying these two situations are the same? This is WAY worse then Conner. Poll? Hard call. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted July 16, 2011 Share Posted July 16, 2011 Are you really this stupid? Paging Mr Kettle You have message from Mr Pot Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RI Bills Fan Posted July 16, 2011 Share Posted July 16, 2011 It's amazing how this argument follows party lines. A few years ago the loudest voices advocating spending cuts and deficit reduction (both in Washington and on this board) were yelling "Reagan Proved that deficits don't matter!" and the people on the other side were screaming about the level of spending going on with the opposite party in power. Now the former Deficit Doves have become RABID Deficit Hawks. While many (but not all) of the former Deficit Hawks are largely silent. Personally I wanted deficit reduction when Bush was in office and I want it even more now. But I can see reality, 2 dollars in tax increases for every 4 dollars in Meaningful Spending cuts would be a good start, equal amounts would be even better but won't even be considered due to political reality. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magox Posted July 16, 2011 Share Posted July 16, 2011 (edited) Are you really this stupid? Go back to your hole Edited July 16, 2011 by Magox Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wacka Posted July 16, 2011 Share Posted July 16, 2011 http://www.youtube.com/watch_popup?v=3JDT5vBQQr8&vq=medium Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts