BYGD1 Posted January 23, 2010 Share Posted January 23, 2010 Ex-Patriots defensive coordinator Dean Pees may be in the mix for the same position with the Bills. Pees, 60, looked to be a shoe-in for the gig in Denver before LBs coach Don Martindale emerged as the favorite. Bills new head coach Chan Gailey also mentioned at his presser that he was open to a change to the 3-4 defense, and Pees would fit that bill here is link http://www.rotoworld.com/content/Home_NFL.aspx Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malazan Posted January 23, 2010 Share Posted January 23, 2010 The article from the Boston Herald is entirely speculation. There's no source or reason beyond the Bills need a DC and he held the position before. This is the reporter circle jerk. A reporter think something up and then a bunch of others report on the *thought* the other reporter had...ESPN is really good at this as they report on what they themselves have reported. We've already seem this same postulation by posters here with a much better explanation and far superior theories on why this would / would not happen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phlegm Alley Posted January 23, 2010 Share Posted January 23, 2010 He does satisfy the age requirement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stealth Posted January 23, 2010 Share Posted January 23, 2010 If we're gonna play the 3-4. I'd rather get a coach who's gonna play an agressive version of that defense, and not the laid back bend but don't break 3-4 that the patriots play, from that parcells lineage. I'm still hoping for jets lb coach Bob Sutton, when it's all said and done. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zazie Posted January 23, 2010 Share Posted January 23, 2010 The article from the Boston Herald is entirely speculation. There's no source or reason beyond the Bills need a DC and he held the position before. This is the reporter circle jerk. A reporter think something up and then a bunch of others report on the *thought* the other reporter had...ESPN is really good at this as they report on what they themselves have reported.We've already seem this same postulation by posters here with a much better explanation and far superior theories on why this would / would not happen. I have noticed that a couple of times, its true Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BYGD1 Posted January 23, 2010 Author Share Posted January 23, 2010 The article from the Boston Herald is entirely speculation. There's no source or reason beyond the Bills need a DC and he held the position before. This is the reporter circle jerk. A reporter think something up and then a bunch of others report on the *thought* the other reporter had...ESPN is really good at this as they report on what they themselves have reported. We've already seem this same postulation by posters here with a much better explanation and far superior theories on why this would / would not happen. Everything on the Board is Speculation LOL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malazan Posted January 23, 2010 Share Posted January 23, 2010 Everything on the Board is Speculation LOL Yes, and there is much better speculation then this "article" from a "reporter" on this board. I thought I made that point, but it does seem that I didn't make it very clear. There's no point to this as there are no more facts then are already available on this board are much more thoroughly fleshed out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bkc Posted January 23, 2010 Share Posted January 23, 2010 If we're gonna play the 3-4. I'd rather get a coach who's gonna play an agressive version of that defense, and not the laid back bend but don't break 3-4 that the patriots play, from that parcells lineage. I'm still hoping for jets lb coach Bob Sutton, when it's all said and done. I live in jets counry, I do not have an opinion on Sutton , but every jets fan I know complained about him constantly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stealth Posted January 23, 2010 Share Posted January 23, 2010 I live in jets counry, I do not have an opinion on Sutton , but every jets fan I know complained about him constantly I live 15 minutes from East Ruthorford, NJ never once heard jets fans complain about Sutton, or anything relating to their defense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fmr60 Posted January 23, 2010 Share Posted January 23, 2010 I think he's a little young for the job. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted January 23, 2010 Share Posted January 23, 2010 Any coach could be considered "in the mix." Personally I think the delay is that the Bills are waiting for the Jets to lose or the SB to be played and looking at an assistant from the winner. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BYGD1 Posted January 23, 2010 Author Share Posted January 23, 2010 I think he's a little young for the job. My Logical Guess, since time is of the essence, the Bill would have hired a DC already if their 1st Pick was available that would lend one to believe their 1st target is on a Team Still Playing, SO Jets or Vikings are the best Defensive Teams Left Probably Not Frazier, possible DC and ASST Head Coach but I would doubt that, SO maybe Sutton is a Target? I know there are far better on here to offer their opinion and Mine is HIGHLY Speculative LOL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BYGD1 Posted January 23, 2010 Author Share Posted January 23, 2010 Any coach could be considered "in the mix." Personally I think the delay is that the Bills are waiting for the Jets to lose or the SB to be played and looking at an assistant from the winner. I agree unless they are in negotiations and there is a snag with someone else Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bkc Posted January 23, 2010 Share Posted January 23, 2010 I live 15 minutes from East Ruthorford, NJ never once heard jets fans complain about Sutton, or anything relating to their defense. they hated him when we ws running the show Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChasBB Posted January 23, 2010 Share Posted January 23, 2010 If you read the fan comments at bottom of this link: http://www.bostonherald.com/blogs/sports/r...-not-to-return/ ... it sounds like they could not wait to get rid of this guy Dan Pee. Of course, a few fans opinions is probably irrelevant anyhow, but better check this guy out thoroughly before bringing him to Buffalo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lofton80 Posted January 23, 2010 Share Posted January 23, 2010 Do they think Belechek wasn't calling the shots on D? I think he knew it would be a down year when he traded Seymour, trade made no sense otherwise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaninATL Posted January 23, 2010 Share Posted January 23, 2010 "Dan Pee's"? That is brutal... What's w/ the apostrophe? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsRUs Posted January 23, 2010 Share Posted January 23, 2010 "Dan Pee's"? That is brutal... What's w/ the apostrophe? Sorry , but I couldn't resist. Do we really want Pee on our D? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted January 23, 2010 Share Posted January 23, 2010 Do they think Belechek wasn't calling the shots on D? I think he knew it would be a down year when he traded Seymour, trade made no sense otherwise. I have no doubt that Belichick thought the Pats' defense could win without Seymour, and that he could merely trade-for Derrick Burgess and things would be fine. Obviously that didn't work. What would be even more hilarious is if there's no 2011 season (okay, that's not SO funny) and that 1st rounder he got in trade doesn't even see the field until 2012. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest dog14787 Posted January 23, 2010 Share Posted January 23, 2010 Sorry , but I couldn't resist. Do we really want Pee on our D? We probably should Pee on our D, with Chan "the man" Gailey/ Pee on the D, maybe we could beat the Pats. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malazan Posted January 23, 2010 Share Posted January 23, 2010 Sorry , but I couldn't resist. Do we really want Pee on our D? We have Whitner..excuse me, Lil'Donte Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RuntheDamnBall Posted January 23, 2010 Share Posted January 23, 2010 It's not like this defense needs any assistance pissing its pants. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tasmo Posted January 23, 2010 Share Posted January 23, 2010 He does satisfy the age requirement. I like the fact that these guys are old. Not for nothing, but if you survive and thrive at this level for that many years you have seen it all 30 times and will probably bleed football until the day you die. Might as well take advantage of the experience. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BYGD1 Posted January 23, 2010 Author Share Posted January 23, 2010 PFT on PEE's http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/...-else-lined-up/ Source says PEE's turned downed Bronco's because he has a GIG lined up I know I am speculating again Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
papazoid Posted January 23, 2010 Share Posted January 23, 2010 PFT on PEE's http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/...-else-lined-up/ Source says PEE's turned downed Bronco's because he has a GIG lined up I know I am speculating again ok...i got the airport covered...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cåblelady Posted January 23, 2010 Share Posted January 23, 2010 ok...i got the airport covered...... You da man! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob in STL Posted January 23, 2010 Share Posted January 23, 2010 If we're gonna play the 3-4. I'd rather get a coach who's gonna play an agressive version of that defense, and not the laid back bend but don't break 3-4 that the patriots play, from that parcells lineage. I'm still hoping for jets lb coach Bob Sutton, when it's all said and done. Yes right, because that lousy Pats* defense only won 3 Super Bowls. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billnutinphoenix Posted January 23, 2010 Share Posted January 23, 2010 His family is from Buffalo..It would only make sense... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted January 23, 2010 Share Posted January 23, 2010 Yes right, because that lousy Pats* defense only won 3 Super Bowls. Pees joined the Patriots in 2004, as LB'er coach. He became DC in 2006 after Mangina left. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
voodoo poonani Posted January 24, 2010 Share Posted January 24, 2010 Pees joined the Patriots in 2004, as LB'er coach. He became DC in 2006 after Mangina left. yeah and then they went 16-0, to the super bowl and lost in the final minutes. 18-1 I'd take that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orton's Arm Posted January 24, 2010 Share Posted January 24, 2010 Why is it that almost everyone associated with the Bills' defensive coordinator search has a name with sexual or scatological connotations? First it was Jim "defensive master" Bates. The last time around, we heard about how Brett Maxie pads his defensive stats in the Tampon 2. (At least, I think he was associated with the Tampa 2.) And now this!! I mean, a guy named Dan Pees? At least we haven't (yet?) interviewed Monte Kiffin. I guess in the first job interview, Kiffin would show the Bills part of what he had to offer. Then in the next interview, he'd show them a little more of himself. And in the third interview, the Bills would get to see the full . . . well, never mind. Edit: if we really did want a guy named Dan Pees, there's no way we should have fired our most recent head coach. Their two names were made for each other! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BLZFAN4LIFE Posted January 24, 2010 Share Posted January 24, 2010 I think he's a little young for the job. ...And he's a northerner. Born in Ohio, coached at Michigan State, Kent, and New England. He doesn't fit the good ole boy profile. For some reason we are becoming the Buffalo Hillbillies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WellDressed Posted January 24, 2010 Share Posted January 24, 2010 ...And he's a northerner. Born in Ohio, coached at Michigan State, Kent, and New England. He doesn't fit the good ole boy profile. For some reason we are becoming the Buffalo Hillbillies. Is he a sexy northerner?? lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BLZFAN4LIFE Posted January 24, 2010 Share Posted January 24, 2010 Is he a sexy northerner?? lol That would be a negative. http://www.bostonherald.com/blogs/sports/r...009/12/pees.jpg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thurman#1 Posted January 24, 2010 Share Posted January 24, 2010 If you read the fan comments at bottom of this link: http://www.bostonherald.com/blogs/sports/r...-not-to-return/ ... it sounds like they could not wait to get rid of this guy Dan Pee. Of course, a few fans opinions is probably irrelevant anyhow, but better check this guy out thoroughly before bringing him to Buffalo. Pats* fans believe they are entitled to the #1 defense in the league every year. They tend to overlook the fact that their personnel the last two years or so just haven't been very good. Don't pay attention to them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bladiebla Posted January 24, 2010 Share Posted January 24, 2010 Errr he was diagnosed with cancer... fat chance he'll become our DC: http://espn.go.com/blog/afceast/post/_/id/...ancer-in-summer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillnutinHouston Posted January 24, 2010 Share Posted January 24, 2010 You didn't really put an apostrophe in the man's name, did you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter Posted January 25, 2010 Share Posted January 25, 2010 Apparently, he was hired by Ravens Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob in STL Posted January 25, 2010 Share Posted January 25, 2010 Pees joined the Patriots in 2004, as LB'er coach. He became DC in 2006 after Mangina left. So his career has done a little better than Chuck Lester's? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsGuyInMalta Posted January 25, 2010 Share Posted January 25, 2010 Damn, I was really hoping we'd get him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts