Dr. Who

Simpson's heinous crime was well after his playing years and widely condemned. The Bills do not keep scum character players because they are talented. That's the Chief's MO. Jerk comment.

Just another reason to hate them. I don't think the Bengals win it. Too young, I think they get punched in the mouth. But I'm rooting for them. Much better if they lose in Orchard Park.

I had the same experience on the rewatch. When you know the result, the dramatic achievement of the moment which decides how an event will play out is necessarily missing. Euphoria is the joy of victory. You just can't replicate that. I did note that Josh's last incompletion was early in the 2nd qtr. Our ability to run really dictated that game as much as the superlative passing game. They fed off each other and it truly makes the offense close to unstoppable. Avoid turnovers and you win.

Damn, I have to agree with Gene1973.

Yes, I was using a euphemism because that particular slant quickly becomes a topic that derails into polemical bickering. But I agree with you.

Been wrong about that for decades. Thanks for the correction.

And the baseball scenes were filmed at Pilot Field (aka as Sahlen Field and a host of others.) Along with Jeremiah Johnson, among the best of Redford's efforts and arguably the greatest baseball movie ever made. You're missing out.

Saw that on History channel the other day. Who knew that tough cowboy was wearing pantyhose beneath his chaps?

Don't care for the new crowd at all. If you can find them on one of those retro channels, Dick Cavett had some really interesting actual conversations with folks. But seems it's mostly all about cheap laughs and bowing down to the topic of the day, so I tune out.

Naughty, very naughty.

Just being realistic is habitual rhetoric of the troll kind. You do know that the Bills were picked before the year as one of the teams with a good chance to make the SB because of past performance, so clearly this is not based solely on demolishing NE, or the current five game winning streak, or Josh Allen being a special qb, or the run game showing up with consistency, or the absurd amount of time and clean pockets Josh had to throw from against a solid Pats*D or the stats regarding how often the #1 scoring defense makes it to the SB or that the Bills are the only team in the playoffs that is top five offense and defense, etc. And of course, your little sophistries don't bear scrutiny. When you say the Bills haven't won a road playoff game in thirty years, one has to remember the 25 years of drought, so it's a small sample size, rather than the implied power of 30 as if they have failed again and again. The only demon that needs to be exorcized here is a certain poster whose honesty is deeply dishonest. Sorry Milton W. Couldn't help myself. I'm now going to say three Hail Mary's and lay on a bed of nails.

Well, I don't really make a judgement based on the consensus of social media and Chief's fans. I think that is actually a pretty good road to imbecility, but if it works for you, have at it.

We won by 18 in their house this year. Yes, they are playing much better and Tre White is missing. Last time, we didn't have Milano and we are also playing better. The oline is surprisingly effective in the latest iteration and Singletary is providing a genuine rushing game. Bills can legitimately win the game. They are not in the position of hoping to steal a victory. As usual, you are only interested in marshalling evidence to paint bleak or desperate pictures. What a terrific human being you must be to devote so much time and energy to bringing everyone down. (And you're wrong.)

I'm not sure you're ever going to see it then.

Obviously bigger in the sense that a victory over Rat Face and Co. would mean a home AFC championship game. (But you know this.)

I'd really hate to see how you treat your enemies . . .

Correct. Anyone who thinks the Bills' chances of victory are below 30% are trolling or not very bright.

Lived in Atlanta for over forty years, but recently moved. Have not heard any serious discussion of a name change. And if the Blackhawks ever cave and get rid of the best sweater in hockey, shame on them.

Have a look at the Chiefs' board (but don't get too close, you'll catch something disagreeable.)

Yes, I wasn't actually too interested in a close examination of the game. I was reacting to a claim in a prior post and trying to make a broader point. I do remember some of those instances and I certainly made my usual ineffective protest to the telly which is yet to respond once to my indignation. On the whole, relative to what the Bills usually experience, it wasn't as egregious as it can get. When you have a dominant win, few care. In the one score games, folks remember. I expect the remaining contests will likely be close. Neutral site, metaphysically perfect officiating, I think the Bills win most games. Historical reality, alas, is always messy. Win by two scores to insulate yourself from zebra malpractice.

Plausible and if second scenario, I am livid. Inadvertent whistle suddenly becomes a new way to take away a good play, etc.

Probably not, but the Raiders' db clearly stopped short. NFL is sticklers for rules when they want to be. According to rule, should have replayed the down.

In a game where we were historically dominant, so nothing they could do even if they were so inclined. I don't trust the zebras in an even match up, but can't do anything about it. If we avoid turnovers, I think we win.

This happens in all areas of life. And then we vote on things and call it truth.