Coach Tuesday

Have you ever worked for a professional company? You're outing yourself as someone who has never had to sit through a manager-level HR training program (good for you, they suck). The risk that other employees would bring harassment claims and point to that relationship as evidence of a lackadaisical workplace culture (or worse). The risk that she would sue for retaliation if fired. Many others. This is standard practice. Want more risk? The risk that Terry ends up being the subject of an article like this one. You just can't have this stuff going on between your chief risk officers, especially if it wasn't disclosed per company policy, violates company policy, and/or was so out in the open and reckless that it makes everyone uncomfortable.

I’m not saying that - I’m saying it opens up the organization to unnecessary risk, for a slew of reasons. Agree with you about the optics.

I explained it above - their particular roles (GC and COO) makes it highly problematic, especially if it violates a written policy. That said, even though she reported to him, I wouldn’t be casually referring to the General Counsel as an “underling.” They’re both usually c-suite titles. This probably could’ve been handled differently by everyone - they should’ve promptly disclosed the relationship (they may not have wanted to because one or both of them may be married), and then her reporting line should’ve been moved over to Terry directly.

Life ain’t that simple my friend. This. You can’t have your GC - who is your chief risk manager for the entire organization - engage in such risky behavior. Your COO is a close second there in terms of who you’d need to be risk-appropriate. And perhaps if they had disclosed it promptly and properly it would’ve been dealt with differently (though one of them surely would’ve had to leave).

Sutton cannot separate.

Figured it had to be workplace romance - firing the GC and COO on the same day is beyond unusual. Those Harborcenter parties must be something else!

Again: people who start new threads on topics being discussed at length might be worse than people who stand up as soon as the doors open when the airplane reaches the gate.

It is clearly a lack of practice or lack of practicing the correct way on offense. You simply have to contrast it with what the Jags were able to do on multiple third downs - Lawrence faced the rush and threw it to a specific spot on the field he knew his receiver would end up in due to the coverage and play call and it worked over and over again. That is a well-timed, precise, practiced and properly COACHED offense that a lesser QB than Allen was able to execute successfully. We need an overhaul of the entire approach on offense, from the roster allocation strategy to the coaching. I am convinced.

Diggs won a walk-off playoff game with one of the greatest contested catches I’ve ever seen. He can make and has made that play.

Sure.

That drop by Gabe Davis-Scantling-Bey was an absolute killer yesterday.

You idiot.

Starting to feel like a lost season already. Damn.

I will say this - these guys really trust their (original) evaluations.

Go Sabres!

It legit seemed like the Jags knew what plays we were running, and/or the snap counts yesterday.

Yep and Hyde was in his ear repeatedly about it, all game. Kid has not put in the study work and it showed yesterday. Really disappointing.

Ralph would’ve said something.

They have real process problems under McD. Game planning was a joke on offense. Not using the tight ends. Not adjusting to the officiating. Stupid punt return. Travel logistics. This stuff just keeps happening under McD enough times per year that it costs them homefield advantage. Also: Gabe straight up sucks.

Gabe Davis Scantling-Bey

No sense of leverage at all. Technique just garbage. Hyde was yelling at him all game.

I am at the game and Dorsey is in the stands asking for ideas.

I’m here - there are Bills fans everywhere. Have yet to see a Jags fan.

cyborg scarecrow?