ngbills

Lions, 49ers, mia, packers, broncos 49ers, colts, Texans, jets all did it in 3rd. Bills could have if they wanted to.

Samuel has been in the league long enough to know he is not that guy.

There were plenty of takers. Have you not seen the trades?

23 wr drafted. Bills 1.

So we have all these picks that were supposedly ammo to move up and what do we do? Trade them for even more late picks. This makes zero sense in a draft with a lot of top 100 prospects but huge drop off late. At least 10 draft able wr or more and we end up with only Coleman. Sorry but this draft sucks. No way around it. We could look back in 3 years and not have a single starter.

Should have been using this picks yesterday to move up and get back in 2/3 rounds.

Pick traded again. lots of picks and instead of using them to trade up for earlier 1st or into 2nd/3rd we repeatedly trade back. elite wr draft and huge need we grab one and the one lower on the list and don’t double dip. not getting the offseason approach. We better have a plan for a vet wr.

Well rice may beat Coleman out.

Chi is gonna be good next year. It’s not gonna be top 10.

Biggest complaint. Best wr draft in years and we walk away with Coleman. This was the year to double dip.

Now rice please

B Rice USC right now

Franklin mcmillan bishop bullard

Man. We are gonna regret not getting ad.

Mitchell franklin mcmillan bishop kneeland bullard

60 - Mitchelll, Franklin, McMillan

Polk. That sucks.

This was most common name for the do not draft. I would have preferred Mitchell or even Polk. Hopefully we get another wr high because this pick may bust. Elam vs Benford type situation.

Depends how they rate Mitchell, Coleman, Franklin, Polk, McConkey. If not a huge difference I would bundle to get an extra 2nd rather than adding more 4-7th rounders. WSH has been mentioned with its multiple 2nds. So could try to get 36 and 40 but will cost pick 33 and 60 and a couple later rounds. So Bills have 36, 40 and 95. AZ has three thirds - maybe you can get one or both the early ones for trading down. You can offer 33, 95 plus a later pick for 35 and 66. So Bills have 35, 60 and 66. Not sure I move much further down than that.

We need 1 or even 2 starting/contributing WR's. If we can trade down and get 2 in the 2nd round maybe. Otherwise we need a starting WR at 33. That guy seems like Mitchell.

Kupp produced in college. Dude had like 30 games with over 100 yds and multiple 200+ games. McConkey has like 2 100 yards games...

Why do so many people say McConkey has a high floor? He has injury concerns, production concerns and size concerns. I dont see that as high floor. I could see him barely seeing the field in the NFL. Maybe I am wrong on him, just never been impressed. Seems like a solid dude that works hard but not a guy that will translate to the nfl unless in the right system.

I get this logic and I dont. Its the OC's job to get guys open and QB job to make the right read. If Allen is throwing in triple coverage he is making the wrong read because someone else is open. If Diggs is always double and triple covered then the OC is failing. You dont have a Diggs there is no reason to triple anyone and its easier to defend everyone on the field. By the logic of you dont want a guy that demands the ball no team should want any dominant receiver and obviously that is not the case. WR's are getting paid because that is what you need in the NFL to win. Before someone says well KC - they are clearly trying to add WR's and doing it with early picks and free agent $. A better take is Diggs was not the player he used to be and the Bills need to upgrade. Not they dont need him and are better with a bunch of average guys and no star WR.

Winning without (guy did not have a lot of stats) is different than winning without (not on the field). Diggs took attention and teams planned around defending him. With him gone its easier to defend other guys. A TE benefits from teams having a stud WR because the S help goes that direction instead of helping with a TE. The less weapons period hurts everyone.

I will take Mitchell and McCaffrey later. I think he can be an above average S or zone CB. Maybe a really good one. If we are talking about him in 3rd or 4th and we already have a WR I am fine with it. But I dont know if he starts over Rapp or Edwards next year and is not playing over Johnson.