teef

coach...some on. let's put it this way. do you think if sammy put up the same kind of number cook did, they'd let him walk?

you think 2 pays are worth 16 mill? oh my. sammy has such outstanding talent that he makes it look easy at times. it just doesn't happen enough.

no actually. that's not my logic at all. i'm not sure how a person can actually come up with that conclusion. all i'm saying is that if sammy did what he should have with his one (yes only one) year with the rams, i'm sure they would have done what was needed to keep him. sammy didn't live up to expectations, so they decided to look for wr help elsewhere. that's the reality. you can turn it into a scenario where the rams where so in love with cooks that they just needed to use a first on him, but that would be trying too hard.

they let sammy go because he wasn't productive enough. they used a pick on sammy, he didn't produce, so they used a first round pick to snag a wr that actually worked out for them. if sammy was their guy, why were they willing to use more capital to grab cooks? they loved cooks so much more? ok. at least cooks is earning his salary. sammy is stealing his. you just don't like what you're hearing, so you're telling us we're bad at arguing. take of the blinders bud. they moved on from sammy for a reason, and it wasn't just because they were so enamored with cooks.

but then they still used a first to get another wr. if sammy was their guy, wouldn't it have been easier just to give him the contract and keep the first rounder? again, how am i wrong. what's weak about my take. i'd like to hear a real answer.

so your saying is there are multiple teams that would have been disappointed with sammy last year? what did i say that was wrong? nothing at all. you just can't cope with it for some reason.

they decided to move on from him...that's really the point. they used a draft pick to get him, and still let him walk, only to use another pick to replace him, and give him the same kind of money. if they thought sammy was worth it, i'm sure they would have kept him.

maybe. i don't care. all i know is sammy hasn't lived up to his athletic ability.

nah. the rams let him go. he was unproductive so buh bye. you may not remember it, but many times the comment was made to just watch how the ram's offense falters after sammy leaving. many, many times. again, i don't dislike sammy at all, and i think he's wildly talented. there's no reason he should be better than he is, but i do understand part of it has been his health. i don't want the guy to fail, but he does have to be better this year or his career is in trouble. same can be said for a number of people and players on the bills. it's a prove it year for many.

That was being predicted too. Once the hof decoy left, the rams were doomed. If I’m not mistaken, the ram’s offense improved slightly after sammy’s departure.

Do you really not understand how foolish this sounds? What exactly did Sammy do to help these fantastic offenses?

seriously. now people are being criticized for giving their honest opinion about who the season will play out. i guessed 9 wins, and i'm not sure if that's enough to make the playoffs. am i trying to protect my "ego"?

what an obnoxious comment. i haven't seen any instance where someone is pulling back expectations to protect their ego. go pull up the early prediction thread. it might ruin this nonsense you're trying to push.

the logic is insane. i don't have anything against sammy either. the reality is he just isn't worth the money thus far. did the bills do a decent job replacing sammy? no, but it doesn't excuse sammy's lack of production. i just find it particular that the people who try so hard to discount or down play anything the bills do, are the same ones making excuses for a guy who just hasn't lived up to his billing. if sammy was on this team, being paid that much with similar production, those same people would be the first ones on here, screaming how awful our gm is for wasting money on a contract like that.

stay with me here...you keep bringing up mcvay, yet the guy decided to move on from him. reid has had sammy for one year, and sammy wildly under performed. i'm willing to be if he has another down year like he had this one, sammy will be looking for a new team again. so...let's stop naming names. do you think sammy's production is where it should have been? stay with me now...this has nothing to do with the bills.

names! what point are you trying to prove?

how did he do on the year as a whole? and he got hurt again...that's his problem. he can't stay available. it's not a talent issue, it's a sammy issue. again, our offense was lousy last year for a number of reasons. none of those reasons are an excuse for sammy being under productive and overpaid.

why is it that the same poster that refuse to hear or make excuses for the performance of bills players, and doing just that for sammy watkins. he's been a disappointment so far. there's no way to argue that. if he finally doesn't put up big numbers this year, he's officially a bust. i think he can absolutely do it, but we'll see. so what? i don't know why you think this is a good argument. he put up lousy number in a high power offense. that doesn't strike me as good.

this post deserves a hug. maybe even a fondle.

I’m beating that drum more for the fun of it, but Sweeney being in this team come this fall wouldn’t shock me at all.

anyone notice tommy sweeney on that list? i sure did.

it's going to happen, but i don't want it happening as much as it did last year.

oh yeah. if i'm not stumbling drunk, it's not worth doing. i crank some john philip sousa and let the neighbors know who the boss is.

i just read this in tommy chong's voice. god i love that movie.

i'm good with this. i don't care where the yards come from, i'd just love to see a more productive backfield.