teef

that's the only way i back out.

i've been sitting in your driveway for 25.

bills talk doesn't, but when sotier's fingers touch a keyboard, a kitten is murdered somewhere.

not sure. i've always kept to cocaine.

it's not that. it's more that your posting is terrible. if someone repeatedly came on here and said, "without a doubt, the bills are going to win the superbowl. allen is guaranteed to be the mvp, and the bills will be the number one offense!", i couldn't take them seriously. you're on the exact opposite end of it. everything you write and describe is so extraordinarily slanted to the bad, that you're not worth taking seriously either. there's no balance, there's no objective thought, there's no real reasoning. just anger and bitterness. it's not worth debating with you, nor is it worth taking the few seconds to read what your wrote. nothing about fluff, rainbows and unicorns as you like to describe. just total trash posting. see?

the fact that you used these examples to describe you junk haunts me.

i'm not gonna lie. i've just kinda stopped reading your stuff. it's just very, very depressing. take the bridge kind of depressing.

want me to pick you up on the way?

anyone know the address for pff? i'd like to go throw rocks at their building. maybe they work out of a small ranch house...i don't know.

back in the day that would be a perma-ban.

i've got your legendary right here, (pointing to my junk).

i'll be taking the rest of the day to gather my thoughts.

I agree about ranch. There’s a time and a place for it. I haven’t had pickle soup, but I’d dive into that head first. I had pickle popcorn this weekend. I’d like to buy a giant bag of it, and use it S a pillow so I could graze on it through out the night. Holy Christ!

Very true and well put.

well, in my made up scenario, sammy was hurt and wasn't available for that play, ultimately couldn't help the bills win the game. see how that works? considering he was on two teams with superior qbs than the bills, and still didn't produce, it's kinda safe to say that his number likely wouldn't have been impressive.

bacon ranch pizza is one of the greatest things around. edit: i'd also like to throw my new found love for pickle pizza out there.

fair enough. and yes it is peculiar. the ones who have complained the most about sammy are absolutely the ones who leaning towards the side of constant drama and negativity. you are one of those posters. they're the same ones that refuse to admit that sammy has been nothing but a disappointment, and still lament letting sammy go wan't a mistake. the mistake was not properly replacing sammy. they tried but failed. still doesn't mean they should have paid sammy an absurd amount of cash for such little production. on top of that...let's be honest. if sammy was on this team with the numbers he put up, you're the exact type of poster who would be on her pounding the table how this team doesn't know how to spend.

coach...some on. let's put it this way. do you think if sammy put up the same kind of number cook did, they'd let him walk?

you think 2 pays are worth 16 mill? oh my. sammy has such outstanding talent that he makes it look easy at times. it just doesn't happen enough.

no actually. that's not my logic at all. i'm not sure how a person can actually come up with that conclusion. all i'm saying is that if sammy did what he should have with his one (yes only one) year with the rams, i'm sure they would have done what was needed to keep him. sammy didn't live up to expectations, so they decided to look for wr help elsewhere. that's the reality. you can turn it into a scenario where the rams where so in love with cooks that they just needed to use a first on him, but that would be trying too hard.

they let sammy go because he wasn't productive enough. they used a pick on sammy, he didn't produce, so they used a first round pick to snag a wr that actually worked out for them. if sammy was their guy, why were they willing to use more capital to grab cooks? they loved cooks so much more? ok. at least cooks is earning his salary. sammy is stealing his. you just don't like what you're hearing, so you're telling us we're bad at arguing. take of the blinders bud. they moved on from sammy for a reason, and it wasn't just because they were so enamored with cooks.

but then they still used a first to get another wr. if sammy was their guy, wouldn't it have been easier just to give him the contract and keep the first rounder? again, how am i wrong. what's weak about my take. i'd like to hear a real answer.

so your saying is there are multiple teams that would have been disappointed with sammy last year? what did i say that was wrong? nothing at all. you just can't cope with it for some reason.

they decided to move on from him...that's really the point. they used a draft pick to get him, and still let him walk, only to use another pick to replace him, and give him the same kind of money. if they thought sammy was worth it, i'm sure they would have kept him.

maybe. i don't care. all i know is sammy hasn't lived up to his athletic ability.