Jump to content

RyanC883

Community Member
  • Posts

    14,334
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by RyanC883

  1. I like Pocic. Always nice to have a backup center/guard. Could start at Guard and be a backup/emergency center.
  2. exactly. This is a very stupid rule. If they hid him from the report the week leading to a game and then suddenly he is out, that's different. But this is total nonsense.
  3. I'm beginning to agree with a prior poster that our OC may still be in the playoffs. Why hire a RB coach, etc. w/o an OC, unless the OC is approving the hires, albeit "under the table." That said, who is in the playoffs that would be our OC?
  4. Get Romo or Rivers. Sit him behind one for the first year or two. Trade #10 for Romo or Rivers. Hope he falls to us in Rd. 2. (if only life were as simple as typing that!). no reason we can't grab him and keep TT. Esp. if we don't land another QB in a trade.
  5. not true re: AVP. That's why there is a rumor he is being blocked from interviews. Olson would be a terrible pick, IMO.
  6. humm.....I could def see this. But stop it. I want him in Buffalo!!
  7. this has all the makings of an incredibly fun situation to watch implode. Too many big-headed egos.
  8. I'd rather take Jake Butt in the 2nd or 3rd, and M. Williams or a QB in the 1st. Even RT Ramczyk would be a good get at 10.
  9. I HATE IT when DB's defend a receiver and fail to turn around at the ball, drawing a PI penalty. Penn State DB's did this twice against USC. It's so basic. Rugby time! Yeah, that seems annoying. It's gotta be terrible to be the ball carrier being pushed back and forth. I'm surprised how long they let it go one for.
  10. good point about paying TT and Cutler. I can't see the Bills not picking up TT's option unless they get Rivers or Romo, but at the same time, they need to bring-in another guy. Mahomes is a possibility in the draft I suppose.
  11. Fantastic topic for off-season speculation. Here is my attempt: Cleveland - Watson (trade back into 1st). SF - Grappolo (Trade) Jets - Mitch T (1st round) Bears - Foles (Romo won't want to go there, they cut Cutler) Bills - Cutler and TT battle for starting spot. TT wins. Broncos - Siemian Texans -Big winners here: Romo via trade; and Mahomes via draft in 2nd round. I would love it if your predictions turned out correct, and we land Rivers or Romo.
  12. everyone does against KC. Steelers D continued to look improved.
  13. not a bad way of looking at it. Also gives Jones experience, and Romo is around for another year to groom the 2018 pick. Romo with Watkins and Mike Williams would be nasty. Oh, and McCoy.
  14. Would be a good plan. Kind of how the Packers had Rodgers groomed by Farve. Let Romo be around Jones and whomever is drafted this year or next.
  15. I like this approach. I'd take M. Williams. He is a beast. The draft is decently deep in safety talent...you can likely grab a great one in Rd. 2 (or even 3).
  16. Why did we let Kromer go? Was he unhappy at the prospect of not being considered for OC. Perhaps he has an OC interview lined up? As Ryan TalbotBills mentions above, he could be a good fit w/ the Rams. Do we have a new OL coach?
  17. I still think Dareus is a good guy. Just needs some structure. Now he has it. I look for him to have an amazing season next year. I agree. This is why we need to keep Kromer. The running game was fantastic last year, and even good the year before with a hobbled McCoy.
  18. Indy has a terrible D. Houston: great D, no QB. I think even KC beats NE. But I agree the Steelers have a better chance. Brock is AWFUL.
  19. Wouldn't surprise me if we drafted one in the 1st or 2nd. I could see the Alabama LB (whose name escapes me and I'm too lazy to look up) falling to us at 10.
×
×
  • Create New...