billsfan89

I didn't get the impression they were force feeding Gore to get him the record. Gore averaged 4.3 yards per carry while that was short of Singletary's 5 yards per-carry it certainly was still a good clip (and considering that Gore was used in short yardage situations that number is naturally deflated.) I think they trusted Gore as they ran the game down to not fumble the ball. I don't think they particularly were just trying to get him a record. As far as Beasley goes I don't think it would be bad if the forced him a bit since at times he is under targeted (He should get 7-10 targets a game, far too many games where he is below that mark.

My concern level is at a 5 down from a 6 or 7 the previous 2 weeks. Right now the Bills have to win 2 out of the next 5 to get to 10 wins. Which should be easy enough, however they don't have an easy game until the final week of the season when they host the Jets (who are suddenly on the rise.) Right now the Cowboys game while not necessarily a "must win" is really a big game to see where the Bills stand playing against a good team on the road. If the Bills can get to 9-3. they set themselves up really well to get to 10 wins only needing one out of the next 4. For now my concern is lowering with the team having gotten fat against the Broncos and Fins coming off that loss to the Browns. The Raiders and Colt losing also is a good thing, although the Steelers winning sets them up to possibly be 8-5 by the time they play the Bills.

I have heard so many pundits saying that Milano up until recently had been having a bad season. He was money until he got hurt at the bye and has been very good since the Skins game. I get that maybe he had a bad game or two but why does Milano have this rep as having a bad season? I think he has been borderline pro-bowl caliber.

Norman has been a locker room issue at times not sure if he fits the process. I wouldn't be opposed to a one year deal at a cheap contract but has risks.

Allen played an OK game but luckily an OK game was all that was needed. He had a bad play but made enough happen on offense to support a dominant defensive effort. Singletary and Gore powered the offense mostly which was a good thing. The defense was dominant their most complete game since the bye week. Outright domination of a team at home they should dominate. The special teams was good too. A little shakey on kicks but Robert's was good on returns. Bojo ok on punts. Overall the offense was good (dominant running while Josh was Ok) the defense was great and the special teams average. Against a bad team that was good for a fairly coast to coast win.

One defensive stop and a couple of first downs should grind this game out comfortably.

Was that not called a TD on the field?

TD would give a 3 possession lead fully agree. Grind the clock two to three minutes and a TD puts this game in a very good position.

Booger is at least entertaining in how bad he is. Gannon just stinks.

Not the best response but at least they gave the defense some time off and shifted field position.

Big time score there, puts the game in the Bills control, need a big time stop here to keep the game and the momentum going.

Good return by Andre, he hasn't had that big game breaking return but he has churned in a lot of good ones.

Need points on the first possession to take full control of the game. Got to get up by 2 possessions and build upon the lead. First half was OK. Great defensive effort, ball movement on offense but settling for field goals and a bad turnover.

Peyton was still good up until his last year when he looked completely shot. I just assume Brady will suddenly turn it on during the playoffs until I see otherwise.

I won't bet against Tom Brady until I see it. Does he look more like a game manager this season? Yes. But that doesn't mean that come playoff time he isn't going to turn it on and turn the Pats into a machine. I hope this doesn't happen of course. But I have seen many predictions of Brady's decline and nothing happened. So until I see Pats and the Brady lose in a big game I don't write them off at all.

As someone who recently moved to Southern California I can say that the Rams have good support as "LA's team" but the Chargers are still kind of thought of as San Diego's team. The only people I know that follow the Chargers follow them from their San Diego days. Moving to LA hasn't seemed to generate new fans for them. They should just move the Chargers back to San Diego.

The Browns game was away and the Browns were a talented but underachieving team. That game was a toss up in my opinion. The Broncos are 3-7 and a team whose talent level reflects their record add in the fact this is a home game and this is an absolute must win.

Roberts has been a quality returner, he hasn't broken off that super big return just yet. But he has had a lot of 8-15 yard returns on punts and 30-40 yard kickoff returns that both help shift field position and make a difference. Roberts is a highly underrated acquisition, the return game last year was a mess and they added a top 5 or at worst 10 returner for very affordably.

The Bills are pretty set at RB with Singletary being the all around back and Yeldon being a backup receiving back. They just need to replace Gore as a between the tackles runner who can absorb 25-35% of the snaps in the short yardage and early down situations. That will either come with a lower mid-level free agency decision (probably something in the range of 3-4 million) or in the mid rounds of the draft.

Every politician runs on ending corruption your using a very vague and unrelated matter to justify a narrative the facts do not support. There were no other far reaching investigations into Ukranian corruption Many have testified that he only cared about Biden in regards to Ukraine. Biden was the only corrupt America in Ukraine? Literally anyone testifying on the matter says that Trump cared only about Biden when it came to Ukraine, this idea that there was a widespread corruption probe is nonsense. And guess what it doesn't matter he had no digression over the funds and clearly was using them to gain a favor he thought was by his own admission politically valuable to him thus violating the law.

NO ONE IS SAYING BIDEN IS IMMUNE. Are you being purposefully dense? The validity of what Trump wanted to investigate is completely irrelevant to wither or not he used funds he had no digression over to extort a foreign power for a political favor. Many have testified that the Trump administration had no other corruption inquiries in Ukraine. This wasn't a large part of a general crackdown on corruption that Biden happened to be a part of. This was a politically motivated action. I literally defined the specific criminal code he violated by any number of means. This is a message board not a court of law.

When people mention quid pro quo, extortion, bribery is all describing the same action of using the governments resources that you are not authorized to have digression over to gain a political favor from a foreign entity. You are being purposefully obtuse and dense.

Someone isn't immune from prosecution because they are running against them, no one is defending Biden on my end. But you can't extort a foreign power to do an investigation that would help you politically. That is a violation of the law.

You could receive something via bribery so it is nothing new. I think you are working backwards from your conclusions to defend an imbecile.

It is illegal to break campaign finance laws. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/52/30121