Mr. WEO

He had no problem getting all over Okafor....after he had decked Josh, pec be damned. But I agree, if the Bills are to beat them as is, Ford and Edmunds need to get to next level. Epenesa was an afterthought all season, not sure how he changes the game. Also agree, Need to hit it in the draft with a real playmaker or 2.

They beat the Falcons. The bye is nice. Still would have been Bills v KC in the AFCC game. Brown was done (but his legend endured). Yeah, having 100% Beasely and Brown (or a decent TE) would have helped. But the Chiefs crushed the O-line. And the D gave up the game in the 2nd Q and put it out of reach in the 3rd. Who knows what's left of Star. Guy has sat around for year and a half. Feliciano is shaky.

The Falcons was a meaningless game, and serves no point in this discussion. It's like pointing out that the Jets held the Bills to zero TDs and Josh to 7 ypa. So what? The Bills gameplan v KC should have included "don't let D line blow by you over and over", so, yeah, maybe it was all gameplan...

Like the "Buffalo Billion"? Most legislatures will point to that disaster and say no to more money for something as trivial as another stadium. Which state funding decisions did fans vote on?

Or some more playmakers on D. Or on the O-line.

If it's completely privately financed? Nope.

Well....it was the one game (and team) that kept them out of the SB. How does the same Bills team beat them in the next AFCC game? You seemed to have skipped detail that when you posted your 'big deal, one game' themed thread.

lol--let me dust off the VCR and pop in those tapes from 3 years ago! Minnesota (twice) and TCU had no problem with him. Nebraska last year turned him into a dump off WR.

The counter argument would be that he brought back the same team that couldn't stop Mahomes, Kelce and Hill, and allowed Kelce to catch so many passes.

Where do they draft a playmaker?

He was PB his first season as Eagles starter and they made the playoffs. Had career highs for passing and rushing TDs in only 12 games.

"Bite the bullet, take the hit now, and foot the bill for a new venue so we can avoid throwing more money away down the line." Why should Bills fans be stuck paying for this? That should bother anyone. Leave the fans out of that "we". Non-fan taxpayers as well.

He had a very good Freshman season. How can you say he was one of the best WRs in the country when he was on the field after that? He just wasn't. This past year he had 7.7 per catch. In 2 games (he only played 3) he had a total of 28 catches and still under 200 combined yards! Those are check down numbers, no playmaker stats (forget about "one of the best whenever he's on the filed"). The year before he played 4 games and had 25 and 17 yards in 2 (5 total catches) of them. He's had 2 good games since 2018. Since 2018, there nothing special about this undersized, injury prone guy who was pretty easy to cover his past 2 years of 7 games.

camp arm...

literally no QB. Ok lol. It's not a QB's job to go fish his pint sized WR out of the whirlpool every week for 2 years. This guy wasn't even the best WR on his team when he did manage to play the last 2 seasons. In 2019, David Bell got over 1000 with "no QB". In only 6 games last year, he had 625 yards at 11.8 per. When you have to go back 3 years for a 3 year player's highlight film, you don't draft him before day 3.

Wouldn't it be more "lucky" for her if she has full recovery and a massive award?

He had one productive season. The last 2 he put up very mediocre numbers for most of the games he played. Bills don't need him.

If you rarely play, you're not a producer. Last year, when he could answer the bell, he had 2 of his 3 games at 7.7 and 6 per catch. Those are RB receiving numbers. 35 catches to get to 270 yards? nah.... I had him covered with "this tiny man"

lol..."misunderstood" you? Nope. You're not much of a puzzle. Here's what you posted: "With luck, the value [of the settlement] drops (relatively speaking) because she makes a complete recovery." The settlement value dropping would be lucky for the defendant, not the the plaintiff, who always benefits from maximum reward. Certainly her recovery would be "lucky" for everyone involved. But the drop in the dollar value of a settlement only benefits those getting sued. Maybe if you had actually said: "With luck, she recovers completely, regardless of the subsequent settlement amount". And why wouldn't she "deserve it"(and why in quotes?)--a massive award--if she is permanently disabled?

Nike is a good get for Diggs.

wut?

The new CBA is a huge difference from before. The judge and jury is now the arbitrator. There may be fewer appeals needed with this process. But the article reiterates the existence of a fine/suspension schedule and the mandatory minimums.

Edited for accuracy.

Why should any of those involved be deserving of such "luck"? The kindness in their hearts wasn't evident when he downed a bunch of drinks after work (?at work?) and got behind the wheel drunk for perhaps the hundredth time this year. So don't look for it in court. The NFL has no culpability whatsoever. This is less likely for Reid's employer (enabler), the Chiefs. But there is zero chance anyone offers the family anything unless they are named in a suit. When he is convicted and they (Chiefs, for instance) are sued, they will be more inclined to settle this suit.

This tiny man has produced little in the past 2 years and has had one solid year of college football (3 years ago). Trading down to get him is a bad idea.