All Activity
- Past hour
-
Thanks, the same to you @BillsFan619 and everyone else!
-
I really wonder if his notes gimmick was a decent con the bills front office fell for. I sure hope not but idk lol
-
Game week thread - Bills at Steelers
No_Matter_What replied to BillsFan619's topic in The Stadium Wall
You are wrong on both bolded statements. Second one is factually wrong, if we run the table and Pats lose 3 games we are 13-4 and they are 12-5. Tiebreakers won't matter. First one is also wrong depending on definition of "close" NYT says that we can lose any 2 games and have 99%+ chance to get in, so there is room for 2 errors. Even if we go 3-3 we have 60-70% to get in depending on which games we lose. -
Happy Thanksgiving!
- Today
-
Happy Thanksgiving TBD
-
Happy Thanksgiving, everyone! May your day be filled with good food and better company as well as finding many things to be thankful for. I’ll leave you with this Thanksgiving memory. This was the day the NFL world was introduced to JA. Go Bills!
-
White Jerseys, Blue Pants against Pittsburgh
US Egg replied to Draconator's topic in The Stadium Wall
I don’t access things as the “best”, very few things truly are. But those unis combo’s are as good as it gets in the NFL. -
It’s very upsetting, isn’t it? Thank you for your service.
-
White Jerseys, Blue Pants against Pittsburgh
Utah John replied to Draconator's topic in The Stadium Wall
It feels like the Bills use a Magic 8 Ball three times to pick the pants, jerseys, and helmet they're going to wear. I'm actually fine with all-white, white over blue, or blue over white. I hate all-blue and I detest and loath all-red. As for the helmets, the standing buffalo will always be my favorite. -
Well, this indicates it's possible the Saints were rigging things. But why would they do that, if they were just going to get Cooks off their roster? If it subsequently turns out that the Bills and Saints do something fishy, like having a trade next season where the Bills don't get close to full value of what they sent the Saints, that could indicate a quid pro quo. Or it could be the Saints were trying to do a solid for a player they liked but didn't want anymore. Cooks likely didn't want to be picked up by a bad organization (cough cough Dolphins cough cough) or a division rival, so it could be the Saints helped avoid that. The language in the rules would seem to mean the Saints couldn't have eventually waived Cooks, and yet the NFL let them do it and then approved the Bills signing Cooks. There's a contradiction here and I don't see how this got done.
-
What Does "Due Process" Mean?
Homelander replied to The Frankish Reich's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
-
MAGA-Infected: Rotting from the Inside Out
Homelander replied to Homelander's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
-
Sure, but that means the Saints didn't collude, they just gave up on a player who didn't want to be there.
-
Elect a criminal - expect crimes
Homelander replied to Homelander's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
-
-
ILLEGAL ALIEN Shoots Two National Guardsmen in DC
Homelander replied to BillsFanNC's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
There is always a thread - right @BillsFanNC - you just can't help yourself.
