All Activity

This is the wildest part. It’s not even like they are high usage players. And they’re hurt all the time.

We will learn if McDermott had lost the locker room today. If we come out flat and look uninspired, as we have a few games this season, I think the wheels come off for the rest of the year.

yeah, likely better to root for Indy at this point.

So… Hopeful Coleman has a decent game?

Grable active...most interested in seeing the starting RT.

Rams have zero accepted penalties against them thus far

I figured their defense would have an off game today, guess not

Time to fire up those jet sweeps for Knox!!

Wow. A worse than usual post from Roundabout. Filled with false opinions. Meanwhile: The Democrats’ Latest Faux Scandal By John Hinderaker Here are my thoughts on the controversy: 1) The story is based on anonymous “sources,” i.e., deep state leakers. Unless and until someone steps forward, identifies himself, tells us what he knows and how he knows it, and takes responsibility for his statements, I assume everything in the story is probably a lie. 2) Given the lack of regard for the “law of armed conflict” that is consistently shown by our enemies, my reaction is: boo hoo. 3) Is there really a “law of armed conflict” that says you can only shoot at a target once? And if someone escapes an initial bombing, or burst of fire, or whatever, he is home free and can’t again be targeted? I’d like to see that law. I haven’t seen any news source cite to it. 4) If such a rule exists and applies in the present context, it is stupid. If it applies, and one were determined to follow it, it would incentivize a massive first strike that would eliminate any chance of survivors. And would also increase the risk of collateral, unintended damage. Meanwhile, it appears that the Trump administration may be intent on bringing about regime change in Venezuela. If armed conflict develops, the fate of the narco-traffickers will soon be forgotten. https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2025/11/the-democrats-latest-faux-scandal.php

unless the Bills medical staff are super conservative in regards to "readiness" I don't know but either way that's an ugly list yep. It well could be

...for Pittsburgh.

GM fired. coach playing for his job players don’t play to lose.

The trainers may be extra cautious idk

I tend to think McDermott is overly cautious

Only 3 or 4 of times were the Bills in a position to even consider tanking. The issue for the Bills was they often had decent starts and were in it at 4-4 / 4-5 and then ended up with 6 or 7 wins. The Cam year we really blew a chance at a QB in an annoying way. I can't think of too many others. Trading UP for Losman and then not having a 1st round pick as Aaron Rodgers slid the next year was a much bigger mistake than not tanking.

I hadn't thought about it, but maybe I will. One of my B-Daughters works for UB.

It’s insane to me that Kincaid and Palmer and these guys cannot muster up their usual 50% snap share at a raw 25-30 full speed snaps. They must really be hampered.

Colts understand— to beat the Texans, just limit your mistakes and make sure their D doesn’t win them the game. Are Willie marks and CJ stroud really going to beat you?

No. Not even close.

so 4 offensive starters and 2 defensive starters (Oliver).

Players and coaches are playing and coaching for their careers. Be it in Miami or elsewhere. I've said it many times and it rings true. Players don't care where the team picks. What do you want them to do? Fine Achane for any run over 20 yards? Force anyone scoring a TD to clean the toilets?

Inactives: WR Joshua Palmer LB Terrel Bernard CB Ja'Marcus Ingram DT Phidarian Mathis LT Dion Dawkins RT Spencer Brown TE Dalton Kincaid

No Palmer or Kincaid … sigh.

I just hope it's quick and reasonably painless.