All Activity

Exactly right! So this trade changed nothing in terms of the Packers expectations. But it’s discussed like this monumental do or die inflection point.

Link?

Looks like the kids in Nepal elected their interim PM via vote on Discord (how about that, @The Frankish Reich?) Sushila Karki: How Gen Z protestors chose Nepal’s first woman prime minister on Discord “Nepal’s young anti-corruption protestors reportedly used the platform Discord to hold an impromptu vote to pick their first interim woman prime minister days after toppling the KP Sharma Oli government through deadly protests that spread like wildfire across the country.” *** “The parliament of Nepal right now is Discord,” the New York Times quoted 23-year-old content creator Sid Ghimiri as saying. The channel’s organisers are members of the civic organization Hami Nepal, with participants among those who took part in the protests, the outlet reported.”

Yep . Bills and others won a playoff game in 2025, not just the Eagles

I saw this and it doesn't make any sense because many teams like the Bills and Chiefs won in January 2025.

That’s a good way to look at the trade…Love is a good QB, but not on the same level as the Big Four. Adding a player like Parsons elevates the Pack from a wildcard team to a Super Bowl contender that at least has a chance to win it all…

Didnt his family tell investigators that he had become radicalized and hated Charlie Kirk? That seems to very strongly suggest a political motive to me.

IMO- it’s different based on the possible outcomes- which we will never know how it would’ve turned out. They could have used those assets on players and not won a SB too- that also would’ve been a failure. But then again- they may have landed the right players and won a SB. It’s very possible/likely that they don’t win a Super Bowl in either way, trade or no trade. grading a trade is based on results imo. If they don’t win the SB with Micah- then can be viewed as a failure and I would understand why. They failed in their end goal. That’s just how I see things. You see differently- all good

Never did Matt. Never did. Some Russian bot did that and they passed around some b.s bizarre alleged right wing fascist group no one has ever heard of story. Trans. Straight. Whatever. He was a far left lunatic indoctrinated by the Democrats.

This shows the last time an NFL team won their last playoff game.

So let me guess ...Finding says that creating a thread designed to show full context Charlie Kirk exchanges, someone who the left has consistently demonized as a racist, misogynist, bigot is akin to anointing him a saint? Sounds about right for Finding.

What time is Bills/Jets this week?

Ask the Ravens if Josh was “the guy” last Sunday night.

But he probably thinks Lamar is “the guy”, amirite?

Down 28-24 very late UB ripped off an 8 play 76 yard drive to win 31-28. Great finish but a rough game against what was supposedly a bottom 3 team in all of FBS football. They didn't look too bad today. Glad to get the W.

Draymond knows his NBA career is about to be over and wants to be on ESPN's first take Only explanation of what he said, because it makes zero sense

That was surprisingly close. 31-28 UB. Kent State showed up today but UB answered, coming back from a 14-0 deficit.

The killers a lunatic looking for notoriety.

You forgot to turn on your VPN.

The Diggs trade got Minnesota Jefferson I think the way to look at the trade is between the two parties and their respective trajectories, not just trade vs no trade right In the Diggs case the Vikings got Jefferson...that has to be considered a win Parsons trade is too early for returns but it's not Packers trade v Packers no trade in a vacuum...it's more like Packers trajectory vs Dallas trajectory

I just don't agree with this arbitrary framing of this move in particular. We both agree that the Packers have "their guy" at QB and HC for the forseeable future. So they have some sort of window with that pairing, we agree. And because they have them, they have one goal, to win a SB. You say they could have gone a different route and used all the resources in the Micah trade/signing to improve their defense with multiple players. I absolutely agree they could have. What I would ask is how is that different than using all those resources on Micah? If the Packers traded a late first for some mid-tier CB, another late first for a good but not great pass rusher, and spent every cent they gave Micah on 4-5 other defensive players, why would their expectations be any less than competing/winning a Superbowl? It's fundamentally the same thing. Acquiring talent to win a Superbowl. Which is why I disagree vehemently with this dimes vs dollars framing. The Bills standing pat to draft Max Hairston or Greg Rousseau or whoever instead of trading those picks or using their money to sign some big name FA doesn't change our expectations, right? We aren't "just trying to improve," we are still trying to win a Superbowl. The ONLY difference is that there is some increased risk in terms of injury by virtue of it being 1 player vs multiple players. But that's offset, imo, by getting a known commodity in the NFL instead of a lotto ticket. They are using their assets to improve their team, just as we do. All this "all-in" and "mortgage the future" is perpetuated from talking heads who need to lay groundwork for the "Was the Micah trade a failure" talking point 2 years from now.