Alphadawg7

@PBF81as I was telling you...Beane is known and seen as probably the most candid GM in the NFL.

They will hate this contract in 2 years. He ain't it.

Im not suggesting to copy the Chiefs, I am saying over investing at WR has not been a wise investment for anyone in terms SB Success. And we have invested more premium assets in the last 3 years in the offense than the defense.

OJ - He killed on the field...and then off the field too Kelvin Benjamin - What a fat POS this guy was..so fat and lazy he tried to become a TE rather than not be a fat POS Trent Edwards - Can't respect playing like a coward Ralph Wilson - Refusing to pay and have a GM, being cheap, and not taking this team seriously and putting us through 17 years of a tragic comedy was the worst. Honorable Mention - Buddy Nix, the high-motor DE's, Zay Jones, Vontae Davis, Nathan Peterman, Nathanial Hackett, and Kyle Orton

2018 though, come on, we were in full cap shedding mode. People give Beane way too much flack for the early years where it was much less about the rebuild and more about the tear down. Beane wasn't rebuilding in 2018, he was 100% focused on cleaning up the cap, this isn't even a question as he stated that over and over again. They were not looking to be big spenders. Even guys like Saffold were short term stop gaps not long-term commitments while we were still building the roster. Its not like quality OL just are readily available. And keep in mind, FA's need to WANT to sign with us and then CHOOSE us (caps to emphasize not yell), and it wasn't until probably 2021 did the Bills start to become more attractive to FA's. Disagree...when you have Stefon Diggs in his prime you do not need to do this. For 2 of Allens best 4 seasons he had a top 5 WR in Diggs (arguably top 3 for 2 of those) and the best slot WR in the NFL in Cole. They still had plenty of other solid to good players as well. They planned for Cole's departure by drafting Shakir and signing Crowder, who despite his injuries making his time here irrelevant, was a solid signing to hold the spot down until Shakir was ready. Instead, the injuries forced McKenzie up the pecking order. Beane has used 3 of his 5 first picks on receiving weapons for Josh the past 5 years. Show me another team that has used 3 of their last 5 picks on receivers in the NFL. You can't disregard Kincaid, he was drafted to receiver the ball, not do TE things. You comment that we have invested less is disingenuous IMHO because Beane also used FA to keep putting guys ready to play around Josh too...you want to say less because Beane hasn't used a bunch of day 2 or 3 picks on WR's, but he also didn't need to for the reasons I just stated. And the ones he did, hit like Davis and Shakir based on their draft slots. 2 years ago, all the rage here and in the media was that Josh needs a RUN game when Daboll left, he can't be asked to do it all. Diggs was Diggs, and Davis seemed ready to start full time after the offense played better with him taking snaps away from Sanders the 2nd half of 2021. This notion that our receiving weapons were under invested was not much of a thing until after 2022 when Davis struggled to deliver on expectations even though his season totals were not that bad. And Beane immediately addressed that issue by both trying to trade up for a WR and getting rebuffed and instead finding a trade up for Kincaid. When Davis proved to be the question mark, Beane didn't hesitate at all to not only use our first rounder, but trade up as well. I don't disagree here so much, I just think the D+ is a but harsh because the more recent investments in the DL have been good ones in guys like Floyd and Daquan. I mean that is a pretty small thing to ding him for, trading for some depth when we had some potential injury issues was no big deal. They traded for him because it was in season, and he knew the defense. What they gave up was pretty meaningless too. The fact he was able top keep Hyde and Poyer her for the prime of their careers, even when it seemed like that wouldn't happen, should grossly outweigh this. Not to mention, he got maybe the best S prospect in this years draft too.

I get your view, but again, based on Diggs extension and then restructure I think it’s clear the plan had not been to be replacing both Diggs and Davis this year. So I think that expedited the transition to youth and the amount of change in one season when the team and Beane decided moving on from Diggs now and getting back a 2nd for this next year was what was best for the Bills right now. And then his is one season in which we were able to shed aging cap choking deals and players, it turned out to be an ideal season to do so given we are armed heavily next year in both draft capital and cap space to make what event big splash moves necessary to keep pushing this team forward. Plus, the list of Super Bowl winners don’t support your desire to over invest so heavily in receivers the way you described. You win the post season in the trenches, KC wouldn’t have even reached the Super Bowl if not for Chris Jones, and then he went out and won the Super Bowl for them too. And that is the same back to back SB team that has underwhelming weapons for 2 years. I think Beanes bigger issue is he hasn’t found that difference maker that can get to Mahomes and over spent on Von (even though he was playing at a high level before getting hurt) because they felt he was a guy to get over the hump. And it might of worked had he not gotten hurt, and that’s the risk with a 32 year old player your sign. 2023 was a bit of bad luck…we win that KC game if we aren’t missing all our linebackers and then who knows what happens after that.

This is just not true through. You may feel that way, but it’s factually wrong. In the last 5 drafts, Beane has used our first round pick in a weapon for Josh THREE times. In the last 3 drafts he has used 4 of our first 6 picks on help for Josh - Cook, Kincaid, O’Cyrus, Keon of which all that have played have looked like great picks. Not to mention using picks on guys like Brown, Shakir, etc as in these past 3 years that are now looking like great picks to go along with more guys we added this year that are promising at Center and RB. None of this factors in the FA moves he’s made. He went out and got guys like Cole who was the best slot WR in the league while here, quality vets like John Brown and Sanders and drafted Davis, who for all his faults still put up solid stats here and exceeded his draft value. The reality is that the group around Allen is young because Diggs was traded probably a year or too sooner than was planned 2 years ago or even last year. But just because that’s the case doesn’t rewrite history into a falsehood that Beane hasn’t been spending premium assets to get Josh more help. And quite frankly, there aren’t a lot of teams who have 4 players who have played 2 years or leas as promising as Kincaid, Keon, Shakir, and Cook is. Most teams wish they had a young nucleus like this. And while this team lacks a proven elite go to target, it makes up for right now with quality of depth. And the best part is that if this group proves to be lacking, Beane has a bunch of extra premium picks and a ton of cap room next year to make moves to go get even more help.

OL I would give a solid B in FA. WR - IMO you didn’t grade him on who he took, but on volume and I don’t think that is a correct way to grade his drafting. He hit on 2 day 3 picks with starters, just because we had guys like Diggs, Cole, Brown, Sanders in FA is why we didn’t spend more draft capital there. I would give him a B as he has done well when he’s drafted the position. DL - I think you’re being a little harsh on DL, but I’m not too far off. I’d give him a B on drafting as he’s gotten good returns on all his main picks but one, which he still traded to recoup a little value back. I think I would lean more C or C- on FA. Corner - I think you are over weighing one pick and whose story still isn’t finished in Elam. Beane has had a very good track record of finding value at the corner position. This is a B for me as I’m not going to kill him on Elam until I see how Elam does this camp and preseason. And he is off to a good start, but also it’s early. And the Rasul acquisition and retaining him this year I think elevates his FA a B as well. Safety - Again, I find D harsh, he hasn’t had to go to FA to find anything but backups prior to this year. To give him a D for a couple guys that backed up Poyer and Hyde feels harsh. And we don’t yet know bow well they will play this year if either of them start (Hyde might also still come back and Bishop is competing to start).

I wasn’t prepared to totally write him off after the struggles began last year, I was willing to see if he could bounce back this year. But to see the struggles showing up again this early makes me concerned. I mean he’s a kicker, there is no long ramp up to get to midseason form, he shouldn’t still have the shanks. The good news is that it’s easy to replace a kicker on short notice, not like they have to his complex playbook to learn. So I would bet money that if he’s still missing kicks in preseason that we will have someone else brought in to push for his job before week 1 gets here.

Ok, thats fair, I was talking with someone else originally so I didn't connect that context in your reply, I get it now. I also didn't say they didn't win...I asked how many playoff games did they win and how the highest priced WR's aren't a guarantee for a Super Bowl let alone a prerequisite. I still disagree with your application given its missing 2 of our offensive young and important players in Kincaid (who isn't being counted as he is a TE and Keon because he just signed his contract today so I can't see how they can have his salary in there already) and arguably our best WR is Shakir who is playing on a 5th round rookie contract that is not reflective of his talent. Then you have Claypool playing on a small prove it deal not reflective of is talent, but fairly reflective of how his immaturity sank his stock. So I don't think you can conclude low AAV always is indicative of less talent. Just like you wouldn't say the Bengals had weak or mediocre talent when both Chase and Higgins were on rookie deals.

We can agree to disagree...but what does your opinion that McD needs to blame himself have to do with the how straight forward Beane has been in his press conferences and interviews? Nor does that translate into Beane and McD are liars.

Now you have really done it introducing context, logic, and commonsense. How dare you

Geezus...you can't be serious. Because McD didn't publicly throw someone under the bus and kept it in house...in other words not disclosing...that makes him dishonest? You know the difference between PRIVATE and LYING is right? Because your actual accusation is that this regime has not been truthful their entire time here. And this one silly statement here does not at all change the fact that Beane is always very open about his thinking, plans, and intentions.

Wait...hold on...Are you declaring Bills talent rankings based on the total of what the receivers make now? LMAO. And you are using numbers that don't inlclude Keon's contract too lol. A team with multiple young players on rookie contracts too. And also again you are not factoring in TE's either. At least now we know what Beane should do with the extra cap space from Tre...give the WR's a raise so it improves our Super Bowl odds lol This is too out there to address. I am just gonna move on lol.

Love this...nothing left to do now but focus on football and his connection with Allen.